ON
← Back to feed
Red star yes, red star no
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

Red star yes, red star no

The article discusses a controversy surrounding the national symbols and historical memory of Slovenia during its 35th anniversary of independence. Initially, it was decided that only flags with the coat of arms of the Republic of Slovenia at the top would participate in the celebrations. However, two organizations, the Association of Value Fighters NOB and the Primorska TIGR Society, announced a boycott, arguing that they did not want to change the symbols on the flag (a red star and a linden leaf). After strong reactions suggesting a defiant destruction of the festive atmosphere, the National Council for Media (UKOM) issued a new invitation allowing all flags. The situation led to a dilemma: 'give the red star' or 'don’t give the red star.' The article highlights how different groups interpret the same symbol, some see it as a pure expression of anti-fascist resistance, while others view it as a symbol of communist revolution, dictatorship, wartime atrocities, and the Yugoslav army’s attack on independent Slovenia. It concludes by introducing the concept of first-order and second-order changes, emphasizing the need to question the initial framework of the problem.

In August 2013, extreme left-wing activists attempted to disrupt commemorative events in Rovte, Slovenia, which marked the 20th anniversary of the installation of a memorial plaque, the 70th anniversary of the Slovenian resistance movement, and the European Day of Remembrance for victims of all totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. The events took place on August 24 and 25, drawing large crowds and featuring a rich programme of remembrance activities. However, these celebrations were overshadowed by the disruptive actions of radical leftist groups, who sought to challenge the memory of historical injustices committed under communist rule. The leftist extremists, known for their violent tendencies over the past fifteen years, have long been associated with ideological violence rooted in the legacy of their communist predecessors. These predecessors, they claim, systematically destroyed Slovenia and oppressed Slovenians during the period from 1941 to 1990. Initially, they exploited Nazi and Italian occupation to carry out mass destruction against Slovenians, later enforcing a regime based on existential fear and ideological indoctrination. Their ideology, according to critics, continues to influence contemporary political structures, with leftist parties holding key positions in state institutions, culture, education, judiciary, media, and even parts of the economy. In early 2013, these extremist groups escalated their confrontations, targeting public commemorations of historical figures and events. On February 27, 2016, they protested against the unveiling of a monument to victims of fascist oppression in Ljubljana, using aggressive tactics to prevent solemn ceremonies. During the COVID-19 pandemic, they continued their demonstrations, often exploiting social unrest to justify their actions. Their presence was particularly notable in late 2012 and early 2013, when they targeted police officers during the so-called “Maribor protests,” resulting in injuries and subsequent leniency from the communist justice system. On August 25, 2013, the extremists staged a provocative demonstration near Rovte, attempting to interfere with the commemorative ceremony. They displayed symbols of communism, such as the red star, the communist flag, and the "Titovka", and insulted Slovenians who had suffered under the regime of their ideological ancestors. Their actions were described as a mockery of the dignity of those who had been persecuted, with some observers noting the similarity to masked figures in partisan iconography, suggesting a celebration rather than a remembrance of communist atrocities. These demonstrations were not isolated incidents. In Dražgoš, for example, similar gatherings occur annually in January, often linked to partisan imagery. Critics argue that such events lack genuine remembrance and instead glorify the very forces responsible for historical suffering. The extremists' rhetoric frequently includes slogans like “Collaboration is a crime,” echoing the language used by their ideological forebears to justify persecution. Despite the efforts of Slovenian authorities and civil society to promote remembrance, the issue remains contentious. A commentary published in Dnevnik on June 18, 2026, titled “Serjejo klamfe in prodajajo bučke,” criticized the ongoing struggle against communism as a futile exercise, arguing that it is based on projections and illusions. The author suggested that the fight against a non-existent threat reflects a deeper societal malaise. Meanwhile, the European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Totalitarian Regimes has gained traction in Slovenia since 2012, following a resolution adopted by the European Parliament in 2009. This day, observed on August 23, aims to commemorate the victims of totalitarian regimes, including fascism and communism. It was chosen due to its association with the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, signed in 1939, which divided Eastern Europe between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. The date also marks the start of widespread protests against Soviet occupation in the 1980s, culminating in the Baltic Uprising of 1989, where two million people participated in peaceful demonstrations. Efforts to institutionalize this remembrance within Slovenia have faced challenges. While the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS) proposed resolutions to recognize August 23 as a national day of remembrance, these proposals were repeatedly rejected by parliament. Despite these setbacks, the third government of Janez Janša declared May 17 as a day of remembrance for victims of communist violence in 2022. After his departure, the new government under Robert Golob reinstated the observance of August 23, reflecting a growing recognition of the need to honor historical victims. In Ljubljana, the National Institute for Civic Education is organizing several commemorative events on August 23. Participants will gather at the American Consulate on Prešeren Square to lay wreaths before a memorial plaque. From there, they will proceed to Beethoven Street, where wreaths will be laid before prison cells, and finally to the Congress Square, where a monument to victims of all wars stands. At 6:30 PM, a solemn Mass will take place at St. Mary’s Cathedral, followed by an academic lecture highlighting the importance of remembering historical tragedies.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

5 reports

Domovina logoDomovinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 753 days ago
Europe will remember the victims of totalitarian and authoritarian regimes

The article discusses Slovenia's observance of August 23rd as Europe Day of Remembrance for victims of totalitarian and authoritarian regimes, a day established by the European Parliament in 2009. It highlights historical significance, including the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact signed on this date in 1939, which divided Eastern Europe between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. The article notes that while the European Parliament passed resolutions calling for remembrance, Slovenia's parliament has repeatedly failed to formally adopt the resolution, despite multiple attempts from 2009 to 2022. It references past atrocities, such as the discovery of over 1,400 corpses in the Huda Jama (Hud Bay) in Lasko, and mentions protests against Soviet occupation in the 1980s. The piece emphasizes the ongoing struggle to institutionalize the commemoration within Slovenia's political framework.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue around the importance of remembering totalitarian regimes, particularly those associated with communism and fascism, which aligns with leftist values of historical accountability and anti-authoritarianism. While it presents factual history, the emphasis on communist-era罪

Why factuality (85): The article provides factual information about the European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Totalitarian Regimes, including its establishment by the European Parliament in 2009 and its adoption in Slovenia from 2012. The historical background of August 23 is accurately described, referencing the M

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the topic in a largely neutral and informative tone, focusing on historical facts and official resolutions. While it mentions the resolution passed by the European Parliament, it does not take a clear political stance or present alternative interpretations of the events.

Domovina logoDomovinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 70yesterday
Red star yes, red star no

The article discusses a controversy surrounding the national symbols and historical memory of Slovenia during its 35th anniversary of independence. Initially, it was decided that only flags with the coat of arms of the Republic of Slovenia at the top would participate in the celebrations. However, two organizations, the Association of Value Fighters NOB and the Primorska TIGR Society, announced a boycott, arguing that they did not want to change the symbols on the flag (a red star and a linden leaf). After strong reactions suggesting a defiant destruction of the festive atmosphere, the National Council for Media (UKOM) issued a new invitation allowing all flags. The situation led to a dilemma: 'give the red star' or 'don’t give the red star.' The article highlights how different groups interpret the same symbol, some see it as a pure expression of anti-fascist resistance, while others view it as a symbol of communist revolution, dictatorship, wartime atrocities, and the Yugoslav army’s attack on independent Slovenia. It concludes by introducing the concept of first-order and second-order changes, emphasizing the need to question the initial framework of the problem.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the debate around the red star as a symbolic conflict between democratic values and authoritarianism, aligning more closely with left-wing perspectives that emphasize historical struggle against oppression. While it presents both viewpoints, the emphasis on the red star as a signf

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed background on the debate over the inclusion of the red star in national celebrations, referencing specific groups like Zveza združenj borcev za vrednote NOB and Društvo TIGR Primorske. It accurately describes the shift in the invitation from UKOM and outlines the differ

Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone by presenting both sides of the argument, those who see the red star as a symbol of resistance and those who associate it with communist oppression. It avoids overtly emotional language and refrains from taking an explicit stance, though it does highli

Demokracija logoDemokracijaParty-alignedConservativeFactual 75Objective 602 days ago
The truth cannot be selective!

The article discusses the European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Totalitarian Regimes, observed on August 23rd, emphasizing its significance beyond being a mere administrative reminder by the European Parliament. It highlights the moral obligation to remember millions who suffered under fascism, nazism, and communism, all rooted in the same disregard for human dignity. The author criticizes Slovenia's historical burden, noting the lingering scars of communist-era atrocities. The piece argues that truth cannot be selective, and thus, communism must be condemned alongside other totalitarian regimes. It accuses leftist structures in Slovenian politics of attempting to erase memories of these regimes and even rehabilitating their symbols. The author calls for the removal of symbols like the red star from official state events, asserting that remembrance of victims is essential for national reconciliation and a free future.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the condemnation of communism as a necessary component of democratic values, criticizes leftist political efforts to rehabilitate communist symbols, and emphasizes the need to remove such symbols from official state events. This framing aligns with a right-leaning perspective that

Why factuality (75): The article presents a clear stance against communist symbols and emphasizes the need to condemn all forms of totalitarianism equally. While this perspective is not inherently false, it lacks nuance by equating all three ideologies as stemming from 'the same evil core' without providing specific his

Why objectivity (60): The tone is strongly biased toward condemning communist symbols and promoting democratic values. It uses emotionally charged language such as 'totalitarian regimes,' 'brutality of wartime communist massacres,' and 'provocative state celebrations.' The article frames the issue as a battle between dem

Družina logoDružinaParty-alignedConservativeFactual 40Objective 202 days ago
How left-wing extremists tried to prevent the ceremony in Rovtah in 2013 [1]

The article discusses the events of August 24–25, 2013, during commemorative ceremonies in Rovte, Slovenia, marking the 20th anniversary of the installation of a memorial plaque, the 70th anniversary of the Home Guard in Slovenia, and Europe Day of Remembrance for Victims of Totalitarian Regimes. The article highlights the disruption caused by far-left extremists who attended these events. It criticizes their actions, describing them as rooted in the ideology of historical communists, whom it claims were responsible for significant destruction in Slovenia between 1941 and 1990. The article references past incidents involving these groups, including protests in Maribor, Ljubljana, and Dražgoši, where they displayed communist symbols and disrupted peaceful commemorations. The author views these individuals as descendants of communist perpetrators and accuses them of glorifying communist ideology rather than honoring victims.

Bias read (Conservative): The article uses strong negative language toward far-left activists, referring to them as 'extremists' and linking them to historical communist atrocities. It frames their actions as ideological continuation of communist violence and portrays them as enemies of democracy and national dignity. The ph

Why factuality (40): The article makes several unsubstantiated claims about left-wing extremists in Slovenia, including allegations that they have committed violence and that their ideology is based on 'criminal ideology' of communist predecessors. These claims lack specific evidence or sources, and the historical conte

Why objectivity (20): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'brutal', 'criminal ideology', and 'terrorist' to describe left-wing activists, while presenting no counter-narratives or opposing viewpoints. It frames the events as an attack on democracy and national dignity, clearly favoring right-leaning per

Nova24TV logoNova24TVParty-alignedProgressiveyesterday
The truth cannot be selective!

The article discusses the European Day of Remembrance for Victims of All Totalitarian Regimes, observed on August 23rd, emphasizing the need for an unselective condemnation of all forms of totalitarianism, fascism, Nazism, and communism. It highlights Slovenia’s difficult historical legacy under communist regimes and criticizes attempts by leftist structures to erase or rehabilitate totalitarian symbols. The piece calls for the removal of such symbols from state celebrations and stresses that remembrance must be rooted in truth and seriousness. It concludes that preserving freedom requires maintaining historical awareness and condemning all forms of oppression equally.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through a critical lens of historical accountability, explicitly condemns the rehabilitation of totalitarian symbols by leftist groups, and emphasizes the necessity of confronting all forms of oppression without exception. While it does not overtly promote specific left翼

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories