Tourists are supposedly fleeing us, and the stores are never full.
The Union of Pensioners (BUZ) challenges the government's narrative about a crisis in Croatian tourism due to high prices, arguing that the situation is not as dire as portrayed. BUZ president Milivoj Špika points out that while there were warnings about potential tourist decline before the summer season, the beaches, roads, and shopping centers were filled with tourists during the summer months. He highlights that Prime Minister Andrej Plenković has reported a 3.6% increase in retail traffic in July compared to the same month last year, which BUZ claims is being misinterpreted as evidence of rising living standards rather than inflation-driven price increases. Špika argues that domestic consumers are spending more due to higher prices, not because they are buying more goods. BUZ further asserts that tourists contribute significantly to increased consumption, noting that hundreds of thousands of additional shoppers, including foreigners staying in private homes, boost local retail activity. They accuse the government of attributing economic growth to itself while blaming global market fluctuations for price rises. BUZ urges citizens to trust their own observations over government宣传
Turists flee, yet shops fill, who’s mad? The Croatian Union of Retirees (BUZ), led by its president Milivoj Špika, has publicly challenged government narratives about a supposed decline in tourism due to high prices, arguing instead that domestic consumption and retail trade have continued to grow during the summer season. The organization claims that while political leaders have spoken of a “flight” of tourists from Croatia, the data shows a clear increase in consumer spending, with retail sales rising by 3.6% in July compared to the same month last year. According to BUZ, this discrepancy highlights a broader issue of misrepresentation by the government, which appears to conflate economic indicators with public perception. Špika pointed out that Prime Minister Andrej Plenković had previously cited the rise in retail activity as evidence of improved living standards and purchasing power among citizens. However, BUZ argues that this interpretation ignores the reality of inflation, which has significantly reduced the value of money over the past year. In a statement released earlier this week, Špika emphasized that the growth in retail trade is not necessarily linked to increased consumer spending per capita, but rather to higher prices leading to greater monetary transactions. He noted that for the same amount of money, consumers today can purchase fewer goods than they could a year ago, indicating a decline in purchasing power rather than an increase. “This is not a sign of stronger purchasing ability,” Špika stated. “It is simply the result of price increases and inflation.” BUZ further argued that the surge in retail activity is largely driven by foreign tourists, many of whom stay in private homes, apartments, or vacation rentals rather than hotels or restaurants. These visitors contribute significantly to local economies through their purchases of food, drinks, and other goods. Špika estimated that more than 100,000 such accommodations exist in Croatia, suggesting that the influx of tourists directly supports retail businesses. “Those who claim that tourists are fleeing Croatia ignore the fact that they are still contributing to our economy,” Špika added. “They are increasing personal consumption, GDP, retail traffic, and state budget revenues through VAT.” He criticized the government for attributing positive economic trends, such as rising personal consumption, to itself, while blaming external factors for the rise in prices. Špika accused officials of using misleading narratives to justify policies that fail to address underlying structural issues in the economy. Economist and former minister Ljubo Jurčić echoed similar concerns in a recent interview on Nova TV. He warned that Croatia’s economic growth rate, currently around three percent annually, falls far below the European average and must increase to five percent over the coming decade to align with regional benchmarks. “Croatia doesn’t need just more money, it needs more production and productivity,” Jurčić said. “People aren’t leaving the country because wages are lower elsewhere, but because opportunities are limited here.” Jurčić also highlighted the impact of inflation on consumer behavior, noting that declining disposable income has led to reduced spending. He described the current economic model as one of “economic drifting,” where growth is dependent on external conditions rather than internal innovation or investment. “The country lacks both a motor and a rudder,” he said. “We move with the tide, not with purpose.” Meanwhile, the State Statistics Office (DZS) confirmed that retail trade in July saw a 3.6% annual increase, marking the 40th consecutive month of growth. This trend was particularly pronounced in food, beverage, and tobacco products, which rose by 3.9%, while non-food items grew by 4.5%. However, motor fuel and lubricants sales declined slightly by 2.8%. Despite these figures, Jurčić remained skeptical about long-term prospects, pointing to stagnant industrial output and a lack of strategic direction. He called for urgent reforms in key sectors, including manufacturing and waste management, warning that failure to act would jeopardize future generations. “We’ve turned areas once used for industry into dumping grounds,” he said. “If we don’t use them wisely, we’ll be robbing our children of opportunity.”
Global markets have seen a surge in the sale of government bonds, pushing borrowing costs for numerous European, Asian, and North American countries to multi-decade highs. This trend has raised concerns among governments that are increasingly issuing record amounts of debt to fund defense, energy transition projects, and budget deficits. The rise in bond yields reflects growing investor anxiety over inflation driven by energy price spikes, tighter monetary policies, and deteriorating fiscal conditions. In Germany, French, British, Japanese, and U.S. markets, yields on major government bonds have reached historic levels, signaling heightened risk perceptions. The Federal Reserve’s potential rate hikes and geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East, have further fueled market volatility.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual economic data and reports on global financial trends without overt ideological slant. It cites yield increases across multiple countries and attributes these changes to objective factors like inflation, monetary policy shifts, and geopolitical risks. While the tone is关切（
Why factuality (90): The article provides detailed information on the sale of government bonds globally, referencing specific countries and bond types, including German, French, and British bonds. It cites specific percentage increases in yields and historical comparisons, which align with typical financial reporting st
Why objectivity (85): The article presents the information in a neutral, informative manner, focusing on the facts of rising bond yields and the reasons behind them, such as inflation and monetary policy changes. There is no overt bias or emotional language, maintaining an objective tone throughout.
The article reports on fiscal data for July and August 2026, highlighting strong growth in tourist spending despite global geopolitical tensions and local price increases. It notes that total revenue from cash and card payments in tourism-related businesses reached €2.88 billion, representing a 12.4% increase compared to the previous year. July saw a 13.8% rise, while the first 29 days of August recorded a 11.1% increase. The article emphasizes that this growth occurred amid inflation and geopolitical uncertainty, suggesting resilience in Croatia’s tourism sector. It also discusses different measures of growth, including nominal versus real terms, and highlights that the purchasing power of earnings increased by around eight percent after adjusting for inflation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual economic data without overt ideological slant. While it acknowledges challenges such as inflation and geopolitical risks, it frames them as external factors rather than assigning blame to specific political actors. The tone remains objective, focusing on statistical data
Why factuality (75): The article reports on tourist spending data from Croatia for July and August 2026, citing a 12.4% increase compared to the previous year. It references the shift to full cash and card transaction reporting starting January 2026, which affects comparability with prior years. While the data appears t
Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat celebratory and optimistic about the performance of Croatian tourism, using phrases like 'odlična vijest' and suggesting that the tourism sector has proven more resilient than previously thought. This leans towards a positive interpretation rather than presenting a balanced view
Economist and former Minister of Economy Ljubo Jurčić discussed recent economic indicators, growth rates, inflation, and declining consumption during an interview on Nova Dama with Nin Kljenak. He noted that Croatia’s economy has grown for 22 consecutive quarters but at a slower pace than previously. Jurčić emphasized that Croatia needs growth rates above five percent over the next decade to approach European averages, but current rates hover around three percent. He argued that increasing production capacity and productivity is essential for raising living standards and wages. Regarding inflation, he stated that it naturally resolves itself as people reduce spending after exhausting their income. Jurčić criticized the lack of industrial growth, noting that industry has stagnated and failed to meet expected growth targets. He described Croatia’s economy as one of drifting, lacking direction or active policy measures.
Bias read (Center): The article presents an expert opinion on economic conditions and policy recommendations without overtly favoring any political side. It includes direct quotes from Jurčić, who provides analysis rather than advocacy, and does not frame the discussion in a biased manner.
Why factuality (75): The article features economist Ljubo Jurčić discussing economic performance and growth rates. While it cites general economic principles and historical data, it relies more on interpretation and opinion than hard statistical evidence. It mentions past analyses and policy expectations but does not pr
Why objectivity (60): The tone leans towards critique of current economic policies and government performance. Jurčić expresses concerns about growth rates and inflation, but the article does not present alternative viewpoints or balance his perspective with opposing arguments.
The Union of Pensioners (BUZ) challenges the government's narrative about a crisis in Croatian tourism due to high prices, arguing that the situation is not as dire as portrayed. BUZ president Milivoj Špika points out that while there were warnings about potential tourist decline before the summer season, the beaches, roads, and shopping centers were filled with tourists during the summer months. He highlights that Prime Minister Andrej Plenković has reported a 3.6% increase in retail traffic in July compared to the same month last year, which BUZ claims is being misinterpreted as evidence of rising living standards rather than inflation-driven price increases. Špika argues that domestic consumers are spending more due to higher prices, not because they are buying more goods. BUZ further asserts that tourists contribute significantly to increased consumption, noting that hundreds of thousands of additional shoppers, including foreigners staying in private homes, boost local retail activity. They accuse the government of attributing economic growth to itself while blaming global market fluctuations for price rises. BUZ urges citizens to trust their own observations over government宣传
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the government's economic claims as misleading propaganda, suggesting that the prime minister is misrepresenting data to justify his administration's performance. The tone criticizes the government for using selective information and downplaying inflationary pressures, which align
Why factuality (65): The article presents statements from BUZ (Blok Umirovljenika Zajedno) regarding the discrepancy between reported tourist decline and actual retail sales growth. It cites specific data from the government (Premier Plenković) and provides some context about inflation and purchasing power. However, it
Why objectivity (55): The tone is somewhat confrontational, especially with the rhetorical question 'Tko je tu lud?' which suggests skepticism toward official narratives. The article frames the issue as a contradiction between political rhetoric and economic reality, but does not present multiple perspectives or balance
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
