tportalIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 658/23/2026 The daughter of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt has taken the crucial legal step of deleting her father's last name.The youngest daughter of former Hollywood couple Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt, Vivienne Jolie-Pitt, has taken a key legal step toward officially removing her father’s surname by publishing a notice in local newspapers. This action aligns her with her older siblings, who have previously initiated legal processes to formally use only the surname Jolie. At 18, Vivienne decided to legally change her name from 'Vivienne Marcheline Jolie-Pitt' to 'Vivienne Marcheline Jolie,' further confirming her public distancing from her famous father. Although she submitted her request to the court in Los Angeles back in August citing 'personal reasons,' her intention is now officially announced in the media in accordance with California state laws. According to court documents obtained by People, young Vivienne provided proof of the publication of the legal notice in the 'Los Angeles Daily Journal,' which is a mandatory step under California law. Her advertisement was published several times during August and September, and the court hearing is scheduled for November 2nd. Anyone opposed to this change has the right to file an objection. As stated in the court documents, any person who objects 'must
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal process involving a celebrity family and their decision to remove a surname, which does not involve direct political content or commentary. It presents the facts neutrally, focusing on the legal steps taken and the family's actions without apparent bias.
Why factuality (75): The article reports on Vivienne Jolie-Pitt's legal steps to remove her father Brad Pitt's surname from her official records, citing sources like People and court documents. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that multiple children of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt have taken similar actions. Ho
Why objectivity (65): The tone leans slightly towards portraying Vivienne's decision as a significant personal choice, while also noting opposition and legal procedures. While not overtly biased, it frames the action in a way that emphasizes her distancing from her father, which may subtly favor her perspective.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 758/22/2026 Another Brad Pitt kid wants to give up his last name.Vivienne Jolie-Pitt, 18-year-old daughter of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, has taken another step toward officially removing her father's surname. Court documents obtained by Page Six show that a notice regarding her request to change her last name was published weekly in the Los Angeles Daily Journal over four consecutive weeks, from July 24 to August 14. The notice invites people who oppose the name change to submit written objections before the final court hearing scheduled for October 2. This publication is part of California law requiring formal name changes. Vivienne wants to change her name from Vivienne Marcheline Jolie-Pitt to Vivienne Marcheline Jolie for 'personal reasons.' Her middle name, Marcheline, honors her late mother, Marcheline Bertrand, who died of cancer in 2007. Vivienne stopped using her father's surname publicly in 2024 while working on a Broadway adaptation of The Outsiders, where she was listed as Vivienne Jolie. She is not the only child of Pitt and Jolie seeking to remove the surname; several others have also initiated legal processes. Zahara and Maddox have published similar notices, with Zahara's hearing set for September 28. Shiloh officially filed a
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal process involving a celebrity family's decision to change their surname, which is a personal matter rather than a political issue. It provides factual information about the legal steps taken and does not exhibit clear bias towards any political stance.
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (75): The tone remains relatively neutral, presenting the facts without overt bias. However, there is some emphasis on the legal process and the public nature of the case, which may slightly lean towards the public interest angle. The article does not take sides but presents the situation as a matter of l