The recent developments surrounding the alleged use of a "sound cannon" during the March 15th protests have reignited discussions about political tensions in Serbia. According to reports from the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade, there are suspicions that students had planned a simulation involving the use of such a device during the demonstration. The office has issued instructions for gathering information and conducting interviews with individuals who publicly claimed that sound cannons were used against protesters. This is not the first time such allegations have surfaced, as President Aleksandar Vučić previously commented on similar claims made around the same time last year.
Vučić, speaking after receiving a report from Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) regarding the sound cannon, stated that everything was premeditated and calculated. He described the situation as an intentional attack on the state aimed at provoking absolute instability and violent changes to the constitutional order. His comments suggested that he believed these actions were part of a broader strategy to undermine national stability and security. At the time, Vučić emphasized that the false narrative about the sound cannon was designed to incite panic among citizens and create unrest leading to potential violence.
The current investigation by the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office builds upon previous findings. During a search at the Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade related to the tragic death of a student, officials reportedly discovered documents suggesting that participants in a meeting held on January 22nd, 2025, had planned activities intended to simulate the use of a sound cannon during the March 15th protest. These plans allegedly aimed to falsely accuse the government of using such devices, thereby creating public fear and unrest. The documents indicate that these actions were meant to generate panic and lead to social upheaval, ultimately threatening the country's constitutional framework.
In response to the latest developments, Vučić was asked whether any authorities had contacted him regarding the investigation. He mentioned that no contact had been made by the prosecution but noted that the government had once instructed a prosecutor to place him under arrest for inciting panic. However, this request was declined, and Vučić viewed the decision as honorable. He reiterated his stance that those responsible for misleading the public should face legal consequences, emphasizing that all aspects of the situation were meticulously planned and executed.
Analysts have weighed in on the implications of these events, with some viewing the sound cannon controversy as part of a larger campaign targeting the state institutions and President Vučić himself. Analysts like Dragoslav Bokan argue that the narrative surrounding the sound cannon is rooted more in political motivations than factual evidence. They suggest that the story serves as a tool within a broader strategy aimed at destabilizing the nation and promoting internal divisions. Bokan highlights how such narratives can persist over time, influencing perceptions and actions even long after initial incidents.
The analysts also point out that the ultimate goal of these campaigns appears to be the seizure of power rather than accepting election results. They warn that unless there is a strong societal response, including bolstering media and cultural policies, the threat posed by such movements will continue. Their views underscore the importance of maintaining unity and resilience against external pressures seeking to exploit internal conflicts.
As the investigation continues, attention remains focused on uncovering further details about the planning and execution of the alleged simulation. The outcomes of this inquiry could significantly impact the political landscape in Serbia, potentially reshaping public perception and reinforcing or challenging existing narratives. With both sides presenting their perspectives, the resolution of this matter remains crucial for ensuring transparency and accountability within the country's governance structures.
2 reports
N1 SrbijaIndependentRightFactual 80Objective 6514 days agoThe public prosecutor's office in Belgrade has requested the Counter-Terrorism Service of the Serbian Interior Ministry to gather information regarding alleged plans by students to simulate the use of a 'sound cannon' during a protest on March 15. This comes after President Aleksandar Vučić previously stated, over 14 months ago, that such events were 'carefully planned and calculated,' suggesting an organized attempt to destabilize the state.
Bias read (Right): The article emphasizes the president's prior statement that the event was 'carefully planned and calculated,' which frames the incident as an intentional attack on the state. The focus on the president's comments and the implication that the protest was orchestrated suggests a narrative aligned with
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): The article provides specific details about the investigation by the Public Prosecutor's Office and references documents found during searches at the Faculty of Philosophy. It presents both sides of the claim without overtly favoring one perspective, though some phrasing may suggest skepticism towar
RepublikaParty-alignedRight10 days agoThe article discusses an alleged conspiracy involving the 'sound cannon' incident, which analysts Dragoslav Bokan and Dejan Miletić claim was part of a broader campaign against Serbia, its institutions, and President Aleksandar Vučić. The Higher Public Prosecutor's Office has presented evidence suggesting this event was planned as part of a 'color revolution' aimed at destabilizing the country and creating conditions for political pressure or violent change of power. Bokan argues that the narrative surrounding the sound cannon is part of a long-term strategy based on political rather than factual grounds, designed to persist indefinitely and continue undermining the state. He suggests that the 'color revolution' operates internally, with individuals from within society turning against the state under the influence of this narrative, which frames the government as a 'regime.' According to Bokan, the ultimate goal of these movements is to seize power, regardless of election outcomes.
Bias read (Right): The article presents a strong critique of opposition narratives, labeling them as part of a 'color revolution' aimed at destabilizing the state and undermining President Vučić. It uses loaded terms like 'false students,' 'enemy,' and 'regime,' while portraying the opposition as internal aggressors.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Serbia
