ON
← Back to feed
JD Vance Slams Wall Street Journal, Democrats for Pushing Open Border Policies
United States🏛️ PoliticsConservative2 days ago

JD Vance Slams Wall Street Journal, Democrats for Pushing Open Border Policies

Vice President JD Vance criticized the Wall Street Journal and Democrats for advocating open border policies, which he claims have led to an influx of undocumented immigrants into the United States. During a speech in Middletown, Ohio, Vance cited a 1984 WSJ editorial calling for a constitutional amendment to support open borders and noted that the paper's editorials aligned with Democratic positions over time. He accused Democrats of inviting 'millions of illegal immigrants' into the country, including criminals and drug traffickers, and claimed that these policies undermined American workers. Vance praised the Trump administration's efforts to prioritize hiring American workers and reduce immigration, arguing that closing the border required leadership rather than new legislation.

Vice President JD Vance accused the Wall Street Journal and Democratic lawmakers of promoting open border policies that have led to the influx of millions of undocumented immigrants into the United States. Speaking during a visit to the Cleveland-Cliffs Middletown Works plant in his hometown of Middletown, Ohio, Vance linked current immigration policy to a 1984 Wall Street Journal editorial that proposed a constitutional amendment favoring open borders. He argued that the publication had not been jesting at the time and that its long-term influence aligned with recent political developments. Vance pointed to the Wall Street Journal's editorial from 1984, which called for a constitutional change allowing free movement across national borders. He noted that sixteen years after that article appeared, when he attended Middletown High School, the paper's lead editorial writer reiterated similar positions. According to Vance, these ideas reflected a broader agenda among American elites who sought to replace domestic workers with foreign labor. He described the impact of this policy shift on American workers, stating that the displacement of native-born employees by foreign labor was a deliberate goal of a previous generation of leaders. Vance highlighted the election of himself and President Donald Trump in November 2024 as a turning point, asserting that voters had chosen to reverse decades of economic and social decline. In discussing the achievements of the Trump administration, Vance emphasized the surge in factory construction employment. He attributed this growth to policies implemented under the administration, including directives to corporations requiring them to prioritize training and hiring American workers before considering foreign labor. Companies seeking to employ foreign workers faced additional costs through tariffs imposed by the government. Vance criticized Democrats for their handling of immigration issues, accusing them of inviting large numbers of undocumented immigrants into the country. He claimed that these individuals included criminals, gang members, fraudsters, and drug traffickers, all of whom arrived in significant numbers. He suggested that Democratic politicians, such as former Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, had feigned concern for workers' interests while failing to address the border crisis effectively. According to Vance, the situation changed dramatically with the election of a new president, who took decisive action to secure the border without needing new legislation. The Trump administration reportedly communicated directly with American corporations, instructing them to focus on employing local talent rather than relying on foreign labor. Those companies wishing to hire foreign workers were subject to higher financial penalties. Vance's remarks came amid ongoing debates over immigration reform and the role of media in shaping public policy. His comments reflect a broader narrative within conservative circles that attributes many of America's challenges to liberal policies and elite decision-making. As discussions around border security continue, the actions taken by the current administration will likely remain a focal point for both supporters and critics alike.

1 reports

Breitbart News logoBreitbart NewsIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 602 days ago
JD Vance Slams Wall Street Journal, Democrats for Pushing Open Border Policies

Vice President JD Vance criticized the Wall Street Journal and Democrats for advocating open border policies, which he claims have led to an influx of undocumented immigrants into the United States. During a speech in Middletown, Ohio, Vance cited a 1984 WSJ editorial calling for a constitutional amendment to support open borders and noted that the paper's editorials aligned with Democratic positions over time. He accused Democrats of inviting 'millions of illegal immigrants' into the country, including criminals and drug traffickers, and claimed that these policies undermined American workers. Vance praised the Trump administration's efforts to prioritize hiring American workers and reduce immigration, arguing that closing the border required leadership rather than new legislation.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue through a conservative lens, emphasizing criticism of the Wall Street Journal and Democrats for promoting open border policies. It uses strong language such as 'illegal aliens,' 'murderers,' and 'gang leaders' to describe immigrants, which aligns with right-wing rhetoric

Why factuality (75): The article reports JD Vance criticizing the Wall Street Journal and Democrats for open border policies, citing a 1984 WSJ article proposing a constitutional amendment. While the claim about the 1984 article is plausible based on historical records, the assertion that the WSJ 'told you back then exa

Why objectivity (60): The article presents a strongly partisan perspective, using emotionally charged language such as 'illegal aliens,' 'murderers,' and 'gang leaders.' It frames Democratic policies as harmful and deceptive, while praising Trump's administration without critical analysis. The tone is clearly aligned wit

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories