ON
← Back to feed
Japan hasn’t named Covid mRNA vaccine the ‘most deadly drug’
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 days ago

Japan hasn’t named Covid mRNA vaccine the ‘most deadly drug’

A false claim circulated online asserts that Japan has labeled a Covid mRNA vaccine as 'the most deadly drug in the history of humankind.' This assertion has been repeatedly debunked by fact-checking organizations, including Full Fact and AFP. No credible evidence supports this claim, and Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare explicitly states that approved mRNA vaccines are safe. The misinformation originated from a post on The People’s Voice website, which included a video of a Japanese politician expressing concerns about the safety of the Kostaive mRNA vaccine. However, the politician did not make the specific claim attributed to him. The Kostaive vaccine has since received approval from both the European Medicines Agency and the UK's MHRA.

Japan has not named any coronavirus mRNA vaccine the “most deadly drug in the history of humankind,” according to multiple fact-checking organizations and official statements. This claim, which has circulated widely on social media platforms, has been repeatedly debunked by independent verification efforts. The false assertion originated from a post that included a screenshot of an article published on The People’s Voice in November 2024. The article referenced a video of a press conference held by a Japanese politician in September 2024, during which the individual raised concerns about the safety of the Kostaive messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine. However, the politician did not state that the vaccine was the “most deadly drug in the history of humankind.” Instead, his remarks focused on general safety concerns related to the vaccine's efficacy and potential side effects. In response to inquiries, officials at the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association confirmed that Japan’s government has not issued any formal announcement labeling the vaccine as the most dangerous pharmaceutical product ever created. Similarly, the Japanese Embassy in the United Kingdom directed questions to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, which reiterated that approved mRNA vaccines are deemed safe for public use. These responses align with broader international assessments, including those from regulatory bodies such as the European Medicines Agency and the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, both of which have authorized the Kostaive vaccine for distribution. The claim has persisted despite being refuted by multiple fact-checking entities, including Full Fact, which has previously debunked similar misinformation regarding Japan’s stance on mRNA vaccines. The organization noted that the false narrative has been shared thousands of times online, often accompanied by misleading visual evidence. Despite these efforts, the myth continues to resurface, suggesting a persistent challenge in countering health-related disinformation. Health authorities emphasize that mRNA vaccines function by delivering genetic material into cells, instructing them to produce proteins that trigger an immune response. Once this process is complete, the mRNA is naturally degraded by the body within a few days. Unlike conventional vaccines, which often require lengthy development cycles, mRNA technology allows for rapid design and testing, making it particularly valuable in responding to emerging threats like the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Misinformation surrounding mRNA vaccines has led to widespread confusion and mistrust among some populations. Public health experts warn that such falsehoods can undermine vaccination campaigns and contribute to preventable illness outbreaks. In Japan, where vaccination rates remain relatively high compared to many other countries, the persistence of this claim highlights the need for continued public education and transparent communication from health officials. The Kostaive vaccine, which has received approval from key regulatory agencies, continues to be administered to millions globally. Its safety profile, supported by extensive clinical trials and real-world usage data, underscores the importance of relying on verified scientific information rather than unverified claims. As misinformation persists, it becomes increasingly vital for individuals to consult authoritative sources when evaluating health-related assertions.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Full Fact logoFull FactIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 805 days ago
Japan hasn’t named Covid mRNA vaccine the ‘most deadly drug’

A false claim circulated online asserts that Japan has labeled a Covid mRNA vaccine as 'the most deadly drug in the history of humankind.' This assertion has been repeatedly debunked by fact-checking organizations, including Full Fact and AFP. No credible evidence supports this claim, and Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare explicitly states that approved mRNA vaccines are safe. The misinformation originated from a post on The People’s Voice website, which included a video of a Japanese politician expressing concerns about the safety of the Kostaive mRNA vaccine. However, the politician did not make the specific claim attributed to him. The Kostaive vaccine has since received approval from both the European Medicines Agency and the UK's MHRA.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced refutation of a false claim, citing multiple sources including official statements from Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and regulatory approvals from the EMA and MHRA. There is no evident bias in the framing or sourcing, and the article avoids taking a

Why factuality (85): The article correctly states that Japan has not named any Covid mRNA vaccine as 'the most deadly drug in the history of humankind.' It references official statements from the Japanese Embassy and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, aligning with the primary source document. However, it does

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the information in a neutral manner, clearly stating that the claim is false and providing multiple sources to support this. There is no overt bias or emotional language, though it does mention the circulation of misinformation on social media.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories