ON
← Back to feed
Kindl was defending a singer who had been criticized by Jacques, and he said, "What do you know?"
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenter9 days ago

Kindl was defending a singer who had been criticized by Jacques, and he said, "What do you know?"

Jacques Houdek publicly criticized his former colleague and friend Ivana Kindl after she defended younger singer Duška Brčić-Šušak, whose performance Houdek had previously criticized at a concert commemorating Oliver Dragojević. Kindl responded by stating that while she respects Houdek's opinion, she believes well-intentioned advice should be given privately rather than publicly, which could lead to sensationalism. She praised Brčić-Šušak and disagreed with Houdek's assessment. Houdek retaliated by questioning Kindl's knowledge of vocal pedagogy, emphasizing his seven years of training abroad under top experts. He claimed he has spent years understanding the human voice as an instrument and correcting damaged voices due to improper use. Kindl later reiterated her stance, suggesting Houdek's behavior reflects more about him than those he criticizes, and stated she continues supporting young artists without needing to demean others.

Jacques Houdek and Ivana Kindl have exchanged sharp public remarks following a disagreement over the vocal performance of young singer Duska Brčić-Šušak during a tribute event for Oliver Dragojević in Velika Luka. Houdek, known for his critical stance towards artistic interpretations, publicly criticized Duska’s rendition of the song “Ostavljam te samu,” calling her voice “bolesna.” His comments sparked controversy among colleagues and fans, with some supporting his critique as professional feedback while others accused him of being overly harsh and disrespectful. In response to Houdek’s criticism, Ivana Kindl, who has been a close colleague and friend of Duska, defended the younger artist. She did not dispute Houdek’s right to hold his opinions but emphasized that constructive advice should remain private rather than become a subject of public debate. In an interview shared on Hype TV’s Instagram page, she stated, “If you really want to give someone a kind piece of advice, you don’t do it publicly because you know the media will catch it and turn it into a sensation. You call the person directly and tell them face-to-face what you think.” Kindl praised Duska personally, calling her a “super creation” and expressing belief that she possesses a unique voice, though not one that is “healthy.” Houdek quickly responded to Kindl’s defense, accusing her of lacking sufficient knowledge about vocal technique. He pointed to his years of training abroad, particularly in Italy, where he claims to have studied under top vocal coaches. “Hahahhah! What would you know about vocal pedagogy? Tell me… Unlike you and others who claim to be experts, I’ve been perfecting myself in Italy for seven years, with the best vocal teachers in the world,” he wrote in a comment directed at Kindl. He explained that through years of study, he had learned how to understand the mechanics of the human voice as an instrument and how to identify and correct damaged voices caused by improper usage. He concluded his message with a direct and confrontational remark to Kindl: “You showed that you can’t hear and don’t know what you’re talking about, so sit down, one!” The exchange, which took place on social media platforms, has drawn attention from both fans and fellow artists, highlighting the growing tension between two prominent figures in Croatian music. Kindl later issued another statement through Hype TV, addressing the broader implications of Houdek’s behavior. She argued that his public outbursts and apparent need to belittle younger performers were more indicative of personal conduct than genuine concern for their artistry. “What we saw wasn’t criticism, it was a pattern of behavior that speaks more about him than anyone else it’s aimed at. Public displays, the need to humiliate youth, are classic signals that require a different kind of professional observation. I continue my work, support young talent, and build without needing to tear others down to elevate myself,” she said. The incident underscores ongoing tensions within the Croatian music scene, where public critiques often blur the lines between professional feedback and personal rivalry. Both Houdek and Kindl are respected figures, yet their conflict reveals deeper divisions around how artistic opinions should be expressed and received. As the situation continues to unfold, observers await further developments that could shape the dynamics between these influential individuals and their impact on the industry.

2 reports

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 759 days ago
Kindl was defending a singer who had been criticized by Jacques, and he said, "What do you know?"

Jacques Houdek publicly criticized his former colleague and friend Ivana Kindl after she defended younger singer Duška Brčić-Šušak, whose performance Houdek had previously criticized at a concert commemorating Oliver Dragojević. Kindl responded by stating that while she respects Houdek's opinion, she believes well-intentioned advice should be given privately rather than publicly, which could lead to sensationalism. She praised Brčić-Šušak and disagreed with Houdek's assessment. Houdek retaliated by questioning Kindl's knowledge of vocal pedagogy, emphasizing his seven years of training abroad under top experts. He claimed he has spent years understanding the human voice as an instrument and correcting damaged voices due to improper use. Kindl later reiterated her stance, suggesting Houdek's behavior reflects more about him than those he criticizes, and stated she continues supporting young artists without needing to demean others.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the dispute between Houdek and Kindl without overtly favoring either. It includes direct quotes from both parties, allowing readers to form their own opinions based on the perspectives provided. There is no evident bias in the framing or selection of information.

Why factuality (85): This article provides a similar account of the conflict between Houdek and Kindl, including the context of the performance and the public exchange. It aligns with the broader narrative found in the first article, maintaining consistency in reporting the events and statements made by both parties. No

Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a balanced tone but has a slight leaning toward highlighting Houdek’s response and his credentials in vocal pedagogy. While it presents both sides, the phrasing of Houdek’s reply ('A kaj bi ti znala o vokalnoj pedagogiji?') carries a confrontational tone that might be interpret

tportal logotportalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 759 days ago
Jacques said to John Kindl, "You don't hear, you don't know... sit down, one!"

A debate sparked by the performance of former 'The Voice' contestant Duška Brčić-Šušak at the 'Trag u beskraju' event has escalated after singer Jacques Houdek publicly criticized her vocal technique, calling her voice 'sick.' The controversy intensified when Ivana Kindl, another singer, defended Brčić-Šušak and accused Houdek of making personal matters public unnecessarily. Kindl argued that well-intentioned advice should remain private rather than become a public spectacle. In response, Houdek challenged Kindl’s expertise in vocal pedagogy, highlighting his seven years of training in Italy under top vocal coaches. He emphasized his ongoing commitment to learning about the human voice and concluded with a sharp rebuke toward Kindl, suggesting she lacks understanding of the issue.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the debate between two artists regarding vocal technique and public criticism. It does not favor one over the other but reports their arguments and reactions neutrally. There is no evident bias in the language or framing of the story.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the public disagreement between Jacques Houdek and Ivana Kindl regarding Duška Brčić-Šušak's vocal performance. It mentions the context of the performance at the 'Trag u beskraju' event and the subsequent reactions from both the public and colleagues. The article refle

Why objectivity (75): The tone remains relatively neutral, presenting both perspectives without overt bias. However, the article slightly emphasizes Kindl’s defense of her colleague and Houdek’s professional critique, which may lean towards portraying Houdek as more authoritative. There is also a subtle emphasis on the c

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories