In late December 2025, Russian President Vladimir Putin made public statements about the military progress of Russian forces on several fronts in Ukraine. During an interview with propagandist Pavel Zaruvin, published on the Kremlin’s website, Putin outlined the proximity of Russian troops to key Ukrainian cities. He noted that Russian forces were approximately 10.5 kilometers away from Sumy, a city in northern Ukraine, and between 2.5 to 5 kilometers from Kupiansk, which had been previously liberated by Ukrainian forces but was under renewed attack by Russian forces in autumn 2025.
Putin emphasized that the objective of Russian operations in the Sumy and Vovchansk directions was to create a “security zone” along Russia's borders, a goal set after the alleged incursion of Ukrainian forces into the Kursk region and attacks on Russia’s border areas. Despite this, he claimed there were no political plans regarding these cities or regions, stating that decisions would be based on proposals from the Ministry of Defense and General Staff. He also mentioned that Russian forces were advancing actively and decisively on these fronts.
Regarding Kupiansk, Putin highlighted its significance as a location where representatives of the Kyiv regime often held photo sessions against the backdrop of a monument. He stated that Russian forces were within 2.5 to 4–5 kilometers of the western edge of the city, noting that the enemy had launched several counterattacks without success. This statement came just days after reports indicated that Ukrainian forces had successfully conducted a counterattack near Kupiansk in Kharkiv Oblast and encircled a Russian group in the city. Following this, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy visited the Kupiansk direction and recorded a video near the partially destroyed monument in the city.
Putin also mentioned other locations such as Cheremoshnyy Lyman and Sloviansk, stating that Russian forces were approximately 8–9 kilometers away from Cheremoshnyy Lyman and 4 kilometers from Sloviansk. However, he did not mention the failure of Russian forces to reach the borders of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts over four years of full-scale war.
The internal dynamics within the Russian military and security apparatus have become increasingly complex. According to reports from European intelligence sources cited by UNIAN, the deaths of high-ranking Russian generals have intensified tensions between the Russian army and the Federal Security Service (FSB). These conflicts reflect deeper rivalries within the system, where the FSB traditionally holds a more privileged position compared to the armed forces. The FSB has been reluctant to provide physical protection for Russian generals, despite their vulnerability to attacks from drones, missiles, car bombings, plane crashes, and combat actions on the front lines.
This situation has raised concerns among analysts who note that the loss of prominent Russian generals could further impact the morale of the Russian army, already weakened by ongoing warfare. Opposition politician Maxim Katz pointed out that the war has elevated the importance of the army on the battlefield, yet the political structure in Moscow continues to view generals as potential threats. As a result, the Kremlin finds itself in a paradoxical position: needing experienced commanders to continue the war while the dominant FSB does not wish to take responsibility for their safety.
Additionally, there have been reports of sabotage operations within Russia, including an operation in winter that targeted six Gazprom gas distribution stations near Moscow, causing losses exceeding $6 million. Such incidents highlight the complexity and danger faced by both military personnel and intelligence operatives operating within Russia.
Analysts from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) have criticized Putin's recent claims of military victories as rhetorical tactics aimed at influencing Western perceptions and pressuring Ukraine to concede to Russian demands. They argue that despite these assertions, Russia's ability to achieve its military objectives remains questionable, especially given the continued decline in its combat effectiveness in 2026. While acknowledging the impact of Ukraine's long-range strike campaign on Russia, Putin attempted to downplay economic and social challenges facing the country, suggesting a nuanced awareness of these issues without directly addressing them.
As the conflict continues, the interplay between military operations, internal politics, and external pressures will likely shape future developments. The situation underscores the multifaceted nature of the ongoing war, involving not only direct combat but also intricate power struggles within Russia's leadership and the broader geopolitical landscape.
5 reports
UNIANParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 754 days agoThe article discusses growing tensions within Russia's security apparatus, particularly between the military and the Federal Security Service (FSB), following the deaths of several high-ranking Russian generals since the start of the war in Ukraine. These losses have intensified internal conflicts, with the FSB historically holding more power and influence compared to the armed forces. According to an intelligence source, the FSB has been reluctant to provide adequate protection to military officers, leading to increased friction. The article highlights concerns over the psychological impact on the Russian army and suggests that President Putin recognizes the potential damage to morale caused by these losses. Opposition politician Maxim Katz notes that the war has elevated the importance of the military on the battlefield, but the political system still views generals as a threat.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information from multiple sources including an unnamed European intelligence source and opposition figure Maxim Katz, offering perspectives from both the FSB and the military. It does not exhibit clear bias toward either side, instead focusing on the reported conflict and its im
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): Factual accuracy aligns closely with the primary source document, reporting on the assassination of Russian generals and internal tensions within Putin's security apparatus. However, some phrases like 'pure hell' and emotional language reduce objectivity.
UNIANParty-alignedLeftFactual 70Objective 657 days ago "Rhetorical reception": Putin's "victorious" statements were dismissed by the ISWThe article discusses Vladimir Putin’s recent remarks during a June 28, 2026, address where he rejected diplomatic solutions to end the war in Ukraine and emphasized Russia’s military capabilities. Analysts from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) note that these statements are part of a recurring pattern by the Kremlin to portray Russian military success as inevitable and Ukrainian forces as on the brink of collapse. They argue that such rhetoric aims to influence both Western nations and Ukraine to comply with Russian demands, especially as Russia’s battlefield effectiveness has declined. While Putin acknowledged the impact of Ukraine’s long-range strikes on Russia, he avoided directly addressing broader challenges like fuel shortages or economic strain. The article highlights how these comments reflect ongoing efforts by Russian leadership to maintain narrative control over the conflict.
Bias read (Left): The article frames Putin’s statements as part of a strategic rhetorical effort by the Kremlin to manipulate perceptions, which aligns with a critical view of Russian propaganda. It emphasizes the analysts’ skepticism toward Russia’s claims of military superiority and highlights the underlying issues
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 65): Reports on Putin's statements regarding military progress, but omits key contextual details from the primary source. Objectivity is somewhat compromised by the focus on propaganda-style quotes rather than balanced analysis.
Ukrainska PravdaIndependentRightFactual 65Objective 557 days agoThe article reports on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s comments regarding military progress during the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. According to the Kremlin-linked source, Russian forces have advanced close to the cities of Sumy (approximately 10.5 km away) and Kupiansk (between 2.5 and 5 km away), referencing a photo of Ukrainian President Zelenskyy taken at a partially destroyed roof in Kupiansk in December 2025. The report highlights Russia’s claims of active military operations and territorial gains, while noting that Ukrainian forces successfully counterattacked near Kupiansk in late 2025. It also mentions other locations such as Chernoye Liman, Slaviansk, and Kramatorsk, with distances provided. Notably, the article does not address Russia’s failure to reach the borders of Donetsk and Luhansk regions after over four years of war.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the narrative through Russian state-controlled sources, emphasizing Russian military advances and portraying Ukrainian actions as defensive or symbolic (e.g., Zelenskyy’s video at the ruined roof). The language suggests a pro-Russian perspective, highlighting Russian control and '
Why these scores (Factual 65 · Objective 55): Focuses on an unrelated attack on St. Petersburg, diverging from the primary source's topic. Uses emotionally charged language and speculative analysis, reducing objectivity.
UNIANParty-alignedCenterFactual 60Objective 506 days ago A convoy carrying "Putin's yacht" was spotted off the coast of Denmark.The article reports that a convoy including the yacht 'Graceful', associated with Russian leader Vladimir Putin, was spotted near Denmark’s coast. Danish naval forces and German coast guard tracked the vessel, which had previously disabled its Automatic Identification System (AIS), making it less visible in international tracking systems. The yacht passed through the Great Belt strait and approached the island of Anholt before heading toward the Skagen peninsula. It was accompanied by a Russian frigate and a patrol ship. Journalists note that the yacht, over 80 meters long, is estimated to cost more than 750 million Danish kroner. The report also references a previous incident where a Russian frigate fired warning shots at a British yacht in the English Channel.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the movement of a yacht linked to a political figure without overtly endorsing or criticizing any side. It provides balanced reporting by mentioning both the sighting of the yacht and prior incidents involving Russian military vessels, while avoiding a咄
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 50): This article deviates significantly from the primary source, focusing on unrelated topics such as a yacht convoy and diplomatic rhetoric. It lacks factual alignment with the main event described in the primary source.
UNIANParty-alignedLeft9 hr. ago The strike on St. Petersburg is a tremendous humiliation for Putin, - mediaAn analyst suggests that Ukraine’s attacks on Saint Petersburg, including strikes on an oil depot and military base, are part of a broader strategy to increase Russia’s war costs. These attacks, which occurred shortly after a previous strike during an economic forum, have intensified pressure on Russian air defenses and logistics, forcing Moscow to make difficult decisions about where to allocate resources. The attack on Saint Petersburg, a city historically significant to Russia and home to Putin’s family estate, is seen as a symbolic humiliation. Analyst Jonathan Singh notes that such strikes could encourage Western allies like the U.S. to provide more defensive systems to protect Ukrainian cities. He argues that these actions demonstrate Ukraine’s growing strategic capabilities and suggest a potential turning point in the conflict.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the Ukrainian attacks as a strategic move by Kyiv aimed at increasing Russia’s war costs and influencing international support, particularly from the U.S. It emphasizes the psychological impact on Putin and portrays Ukraine’s military actions as effective and strategically sound.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
UA
