ON
← Back to feed
Israel intensifies bombing in Gaza after Hamas announcement of disarmament
Spain🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive18 days ago

Israel intensifies bombing in Gaza after Hamas announcement of disarmament

Israeli forces have intensified military operations in the Gaza Strip, launching a series of bombings that have affected three cities and resulted in the deaths of 13 civilians, with several others injured. The attacks targeted residential buildings in Gaza City and southern areas like Jan Yunis, as well as a refugee camp in Deir el Balah. This follows another bombing the previous night that killed eight people. Israeli authorities claim the strikes were aimed at Hamas militants and succeeded in targeting two combatants. However, Hamas frames the escalation as a reaction to tensions caused by Israel’s announcement that it would withdraw completely from Gaza if Hamas disarms. Palestinian negotiator Ghazi Hamad stated that the recent Israeli actions confirm their unwillingness to reach an agreement. Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump claimed that the U.S.-established Peace Council had reached an agreement for 'complete disarmament' of Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza, which he said Israel was very satisfied with. However, Israel and Hamas have been at odds over the negotiation process, with Hamas announcing its disarmament conditional on Israeli troop withdrawal, while Israel

A deal has been reached between Hamas and the Trump Peace Council regarding a framework for the disarmament of Hamas in Gaza. The agreement was announced by U.S. President Donald Trump, who stated that the peace council had achieved an accord for the "complete disarmament" of Hamas and other armed groups in the region. Trump emphasized that Israel was "very satisfied" with the proposal, calling it a "major step for the Middle East." However, tensions remain high between Israel and Hamas over the sequence of steps required for a ceasefire. In response to the announcement, Israel intensified its military operations in the Gaza Strip, launching a wave of airstrikes that affected three cities within the enclave. The attacks resulted in the deaths of 13 civilians and left several others injured. Two residential buildings in the city of Gaza and the southern town of Khan Younis were hit, along with a refugee camp in the coastal area of Deir el-Balah. This marks the second consecutive night of Israeli strikes following another bombing on Saturday night that killed eight more people. The Israeli military claimed the targets of the attacks were militants affiliated with Hamas, asserting they successfully struck two fighters. However, Hamas framed the escalation as a reflection of the tensions arising from the group's announcement that it would disarm if Israel fully withdraws from Gaza. Ghazi Hamad, one of Hamas's principal negotiators, stated that Israel's actions confirm its unwillingness to reach an agreement. Last Friday, Trump declared that the Peace Council, established by the United States to oversee the ceasefire process, had reached an agreement for the "complete disarmament" of Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza. He insisted that Israel was "very satisfied" with the proposal, describing it as a "great step for the Middle East." Nevertheless, Israel and Hamas have clashed for months over how negotiations should proceed. While Hamas has taken a step forward by announcing its intention to disarm, it conditions this move on Israel's complete withdrawal from the Palestinian territory. For Israel, the order of these steps must be reversed. Eli Cohen, Israel’s energy minister, expressed skepticism about Hamas's disarmament during an interview with the Israeli army radio on Sunday. Cohen suggested that if progress in the arms handover process is not made, Israel should take full control of the Palestinian enclave. He denied that any agreement has been reached to halt attacks in Gaza, despite both sides having agreed to a ceasefire last October. The Israeli attacks coincided with a summit in Egypt, which brought together officials from various Palestinian factions and mediator countries such as Qatar and Turkey, aiming to achieve progress toward ending the conflict. Hamas considers itself to have shown "significant flexibility," awaiting commitments from Israel to advance negotiations that would end the war. It accuses Israel of seeking to impose a fait accompli through recent attacks in Gaza. Basem Naim, head of political relations for Hamas, stated that the escalation, occurring alongside political advancements, clearly demonstrates that the occupation government, how Hamas refers to Israel, aims to undermine efforts to end the war and impose facts through force. Hamas's announcement of its disarmament has highlighted the many uncertainties surrounding the current ceasefire process. According to the agreement, the transfer of weapons should be coordinated, supervised, and executed by the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza, a provisional governing body composed of Palestinian technocrats that will also replace Hamas as the manager of the enclave's governance. However, the committee continues to operate from its provisional headquarters in Cairo because Israel does not allow its members to enter the Gaza Strip, leading to doubts about achieving any progress. Nikolai Mladenov, the senior representative of the Peace Council for Gaza, requested on Monday that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu address the situation.

3 reports

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 8520 days ago
Israel intensifies bombing in Gaza after Hamas announcement of disarmament

Israeli forces have intensified military operations in the Gaza Strip, launching a series of bombings that have affected three cities and resulted in the deaths of 13 civilians, with several others injured. The attacks targeted residential buildings in Gaza City and southern areas like Jan Yunis, as well as a refugee camp in Deir el Balah. This follows another bombing the previous night that killed eight people. Israeli authorities claim the strikes were aimed at Hamas militants and succeeded in targeting two combatants. However, Hamas frames the escalation as a reaction to tensions caused by Israel’s announcement that it would withdraw completely from Gaza if Hamas disarms. Palestinian negotiator Ghazi Hamad stated that the recent Israeli actions confirm their unwillingness to reach an agreement. Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump claimed that the U.S.-established Peace Council had reached an agreement for 'complete disarmament' of Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza, which he said Israel was very satisfied with. However, Israel and Hamas have been at odds over the negotiation process, with Hamas announcing its disarmament conditional on Israeli troop withdrawal, while Israel

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents Hamas as reacting to Israeli actions and portrays Israel as obstructing peace efforts, using terms like 'escalation' and 'imposing a fait accompli.' It emphasizes Hamas's position and criticizes Israel's stance, suggesting a left-leaning framing.

Why factuality (85): This article closely mirrors the content of Article 0, providing detailed quotes from Netanyahu and maintaining consistency with the other sources. It offers additional context about Netanyahu's comments on U.S. relations and his stance on establishing a Palestinian state. It aligns well with the cr

Why objectivity (85): The article remains neutral, quoting Netanyahu directly and avoiding any subjective interpretation. It presents the information in a balanced manner without emotional language or clear bias.

El Confidencial logoEl ConfidencialIndependent🔒CenterFactual 70Objective 7523 days ago
Hamas agrees with Trump's Peace Board a framework for its disarmament in Gaza

The article reports that Hamas has agreed with Trump's Peace Council on a framework for disarming in Gaza. The agreement outlines steps toward reducing weapons in the region, though specific details are not provided. This development comes amid ongoing tensions between Hamas and Israel, with the potential for this framework to influence future peace negotiations. The involvement of Trump's Peace Council suggests an attempt to mediate the conflict through diplomatic channels.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the agreement between Hamas and Trump's Peace Council as a neutral fact, without overtly praising or criticizing either side. It focuses on the framework itself rather than taking a clear ideological stance. There is no strong language or emphasis that leans toward a particular党

Why factuality (70): The article provides specific military details about Israeli bombing campaigns in Gaza and cites Palestinian representatives expressing concern over the escalation. It aligns with the general narrative of tensions around the Trump plan but omits direct quotes from Netanyahu and does not clarify the

Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat critical of Israel's actions, citing Palestinian concerns, but does not overtly take a political stance. It remains largely factual and objective in its reporting.

ABC (España) logoABC (España)IndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 8518 days ago
Israeli army chief rejects Gaza withdrawal until Hamas is disarmed

The head of the Israeli army, Eyal Zamir, has rejected the possibility of withdrawing from Gaza until Hamas is disarmed, according to reports. This comes amid heightened tensions between Israel and Hamas following a proposed peace plan by the United States. During his visit to the Gaza Strip, Zamir emphasized that military operations against Hamas would continue to disarm the group. However, Hamas insists that Israel must first withdraw from the territory as a prerequisite for disarming itself. The situation highlights the ongoing conflict and the challenges in achieving a resolution.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue without overtly favoring one over the other. It includes statements from Israeli military leadership and references Hamas's position, providing a balanced view of the conflicting perspectives regarding the withdrawal from Gaza and the disarmament process.

Why factuality (60): This article presents a claim that contradicts the other sources, stating that Hamas has agreed to a disarmament framework with Trump’s Peace Council. This conflicts with the more widely reported position that Israel rejects such a plan. As there is no primary source, this claim must be judged based

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the reported agreement between Hamas and the Peace Council. There is no evident bias or emotional language, though the content itself differs significantly from other sources.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories