(INTERVIEW) Tone Škrjanec: There is tea left, but now we drink it at home
Tone Škrjanec, slovenski pesnik, odgovarja na vprašanje o svojem začetku v poeziji. Predstavi svoje zgodnje zgodovino kot del druščine prijateljev na faksu, kjer so organizirali branje pesmi. Navede ime nekotereh sošolcev, kot so Ščurk, Luži, Peco, Mojca in Pero Lovšin, ki je bil mlajši in zraven brenkal. Škrjanec opozori, da je vse, kar so storili, bilo avantgardno, medtem ko danes mnogi kombinirajo poezijo z kulinariko. Razvije razmislek o tem, kako so nekateri razvili legende okoli svojih začetkov, in opisuje svoj personalen začetek z branjem knjige Jacka Kerouaca, kar mu je omogočilo dostop do beatnikov. Opisuje tudi svojo kasnejšo pot v poeziji, vključno z objavo pesmi v Tribuni in Dialogih, ter svojo zgodovino, da je objavljal pod pseudonimi. Festival Vilenica bo ta teden na temo fluidnosti identitet, kjer bo Škrjanec v centru.
Goran Vojnović, a journalist with Profimedia, has raised questions about Slovenia's cultural identity in a recent article titled Why Do We Not Have a Museum of Poets? What Books Does Šeško Read? The piece highlights a perceived gap in how Slovenia celebrates its literary heritage compared to other nations. While Slovenians take pride in their natural beauty and culinary traditions, Vojnović argues that there is a lack of recognition and institutional support for the country’s literary achievements. He points out that despite being a nation of poets, Slovenia does not have museums dedicated to its greatest writers, unlike cities such as Dublin, which honors its literary figures through dedicated institutions. The absence of such cultural landmarks is underscored by the existence of a statue of a poet in the capital city, yet no museum honoring figures like Daneta Zajc or Tomaz Salamun, nor a house dedicated to Svetlana Makarovič. Vojnović criticizes this oversight, suggesting that even the most significant literary works, such as Kovačič’s Prišlek, remain largely unexplored by visitors who could gain insight into Slovenia’s complex history through guided tours. He further notes that opportunities to promote reading among young people have been missed, despite substantial investments in literacy campaigns. This critique extends to the failure to recognize and celebrate local literary icons, such as Metka Kraševc, who could be likened to Frida Kahlo in terms of her artistic significance. In a separate interview, Tone Škrjanec, a prominent Slovenian poet and recipient of the Vilenica International Literary Festival award, reflected on his early engagement with poetry. Škrjanec recalled his time at the Faculty of Social Sciences, where he was part of a group of friends and classmates with a shared interest in literature. Among them were individuals like Ščurk, Luži, and Peco, who wrote poems alongside him. Pero Lovšin, slightly younger than Škrjanec, was also part of this circle and contributed to the group’s creative endeavors. One notable event took place at Kodeljev’s, where they organized readings, including one in a former cinema on Bežigradska Street, accompanied by a culinary performance involving spaghetti prepared by a friend named Koko. Škrjanec described his initial foray into poetry as both personal and formative. His interest in literature began during high school, though the curriculum did not fully engage him. It was a classmate who introduced him to On the Road by Jack Kerouac, sparking his fascination with Beat poetry and leading him to explore the works of Beat writers. Over time, he discovered contemporary Slovenian authors such as Ivan Volarič (Feo), Blaž Ogorevc, Matjaž Hanžek, Iztok Osojnik, and Tomaž Šalamun, whose work left a lasting impression. Despite these influences, Škrjanec delayed publishing his own poetry until 1997, at the age of 34, due to self-consciousness about public exposure. He initially used a pseudonym to avoid scrutiny and faced internal resistance to sharing his work openly. Škrjanec’s poetic journey has remained deeply personal and introspective throughout his career. He admits that his reluctance to publish earlier stemmed from a fear of judgment and a desire for privacy. However, over time, he found his voice and continued to explore themes close to his heart. His evolving style reflects a blend of Western influences, particularly Beat literature, and Eastern philosophies such as Buddhism and Zen, which he encountered through his study of Beat poetry. These dual influences shape his perception of the world and inform his approach to writing. As the Vilenica International Literary Festival approaches its 41st edition, Škrjanec will be a central figure, participating in discussions centered around the fluidity of identities. The festival will feature 15 authors from 11 countries, with Ukrainian author Serhij Žadan receiving the Vilenica Award. Themes of solidarity, support for minorities, and anti-war sentiment will dominate the event. Škrjanec’s presence underscores the ongoing relevance of poetry in addressing contemporary issues while maintaining a connection to historical and philosophical roots. Despite his late start in publishing, Škrjanec has not felt overshadowed by younger generations of poets. He suggests that his later emergence allowed him to coexist with emerging voices, creating a sense of generational unity rather than division. His work continues to evolve, with longer compositions reflecting a deeper exploration of themes and ideas. As he looks back on his career, Škrjanec remains committed to the intimate and personal nature of his poetry, ensuring that each new work resonates with authenticity and depth.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The article celebrates Ana Marija Kovač, who has been organizing and leading the annual 'Predšmarni večer' (Evening Before the Feast) on Lake Bled for 24 years. The event brings together friends, patriots, and lovers of the Slovene language to listen to readings that honor the region, its people, and their culture. This year's program featured a variety of literary works, including pieces by Ivan T. Cankar, Josip Mlinšek, and others, performed by notable figures such as poet and actor Tone Kuntner. The evening culminated with the recitation of France Menart's poem 'Slovenska pomlad,' which symbolizes the fulfillment of a thousand-year longing for national identity. Attendees expressed deep gratitude to Kovač and her team for preserving and promoting Blejska culture.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on cultural events and does not engage with political issues, officials, or policies. It provides a descriptive account of a literary celebration without taking a stance or showing bias toward any political group or ideology.
Why factuality (85): The article describes an event at Bled where Ana Marija Kovač leads a literary reading. It provides specific details about her role and the nature of the event, but lacks external verification as no primary source was available. The description aligns with typical cultural events in Slovenia, sugges
Why objectivity (70): The tone is highly celebratory and reverent towards Ana Marija Kovač, using emotionally charged language such as 'globokim občudovanjem' and 'hvaležnostjo'. This suggests a positive bias towards the subject rather than a neutral reporting.
The article discusses Slovenia's cultural identity and its relationship with literature and art, highlighting a perceived disconnect between national pride and the lack of dedicated institutions celebrating Slovenian literary heritage. It references prominent Slovenian writers such as Daneta Zajc, Tomaz Salamun, and Svetlana Makarovic, while criticizing the absence of museums or monuments devoted to them, unlike similar institutions in cities like Dublin. The piece also critiques the superficial approach to promoting reading among youth, noting that despite efforts by figures like Slavko Pregl, opportunities to promote books effectively have been missed. The author questions why Slovenia, which considers itself a nation of poets, does not invest in cultural landmarks that honor its literary legacy.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the discussion around the underappreciation of Slovenian literary heritage and criticizes the state's failure to support cultural institutions, suggesting a systemic neglect of intellectual and artistic contributions. While not overtly political, the critique implies a broader dis
Why factuality (85): The article discusses the lack of museums dedicated to Slovenian poets in Ljubljana compared to cities like Dublin, referencing specific poets and literary works such as Kovačičevih Prišlekov. It references a statement by Benjamin Šeško about preferring reading over TikTok but does not provide direc
Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat critical of Slovenian attitudes toward local art and literature, suggesting a national self-criticism. While the article presents an argument, it uses emotive language and frames the issue through a narrative that implies a national failure, rather than presenting a balanced dis
Ukrajinski pisatelj in glasbenik Serhij Žadan je na 41. mednarodnem literarnem festivalu Vilenica v Ljubljani govoril o kulturni identiteti in vlogi literature v času vojne med Ukrajino in Rusijo. Žadan je izrazil mnenje, da se ne gre za vojno za ozemlje, temveč za vojno proti ukrajinskemu narodu. Med pogovorom je poudarjal pomembnost kulturne izmenjave in vztrajnost Ukrajincev v ohranjanju svoje kulture, celo v zavetju zaklonišč. Tudi politične osebnosti je opisal kot začasne, medtem ko so kulturniki, kot so pisatelji in pesniki, po njegovem mnenju dolgoročnejši in zveneči. Pogovor je bil sestavljen s pregledom njegovega dela, prevajanja in organizacije kulturnih dogodkov, ter s pomenom humanitarnega dela.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict between Ukraine and Russia as a war against the Ukrainian people rather than a territorial dispute, which aligns with left-leaning perspectives that emphasize humanitarian concerns and national sovereignty over geopolitical interests. The emphasis on cultural identity
Why factuality (80): The article reports on a speech by Ukrainian author Serhij Žadan at the Vilenica Festival. It includes quotes and mentions his views on cultural identity and the war in Ukraine. While there is no primary source, the content is consistent with known information about the festival and the author's pub
Why objectivity (65): The article presents Žadan's perspective on the conflict, describing it as 'vojna proti ukrajinskemu narodu', which is a strong and potentially controversial statement. The language used is somewhat biased, focusing on Žadan's viewpoint without presenting opposing perspectives.
Tone Škrjanec, slovenski pesnik, odgovarja na vprašanje o svojem začetku v poeziji. Predstavi svoje zgodnje zgodovino kot del druščine prijateljev na faksu, kjer so organizirali branje pesmi. Navede ime nekotereh sošolcev, kot so Ščurk, Luži, Peco, Mojca in Pero Lovšin, ki je bil mlajši in zraven brenkal. Škrjanec opozori, da je vse, kar so storili, bilo avantgardno, medtem ko danes mnogi kombinirajo poezijo z kulinariko. Razvije razmislek o tem, kako so nekateri razvili legende okoli svojih začetkov, in opisuje svoj personalen začetek z branjem knjige Jacka Kerouaca, kar mu je omogočilo dostop do beatnikov. Opisuje tudi svojo kasnejšo pot v poeziji, vključno z objavo pesmi v Tribuni in Dialogih, ter svojo zgodovino, da je objavljal pod pseudonimi. Festival Vilenica bo ta teden na temo fluidnosti identitet, kjer bo Škrjanec v centru.
Bias read (Center): Artikel predstavlja intervju z pesnikom Tone Škrjanecem, kjer govori o njegovem začetku v poeziji in svoji zgodovini. Vsebina je osredotočena na kulturo in literaturo, brez direktnega političnega stališč ali polemike. Stališča, ki se pojavijo, so individualna in ne predstavljajo širše politične pole
Why factuality (65): The article provides personal recollections from Tone Škrjanec about his early literary involvement and interactions with fellow students and writers like Pero Lovšin. While these accounts are subjective and based on memory, they align with broader historical narratives of Slovenian literary circles
Why objectivity (70): The tone is reflective and nostalgic, focusing on personal experiences without overt bias. The narrative remains centered on the speaker's perspective but does not attempt to frame the subject as a political or ideological issue. There is no strong emotional manipulation, though some sentimentality
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Slovenia
