ON
← Back to feed
Infantino is not the one to lead FIFA, reveals British Prime Minister; controversy continues over private capital for the World Cup
World🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive2 days ago

Infantino is not the one to lead FIFA, reveals British Prime Minister; controversy continues over private capital for the World Cup

The British prime minister, Andy Burnham, stated that Gianni Infantino, president of FIFA, is not the appropriate leader to guide world football, citing the abandoned plan to sell shares of the World Cup to private investors. This criticism comes amid growing opposition to Infantino’s proposal, which was widely seen as offensive to many in the global football community. The European Football Union (UEFA) has lost confidence in FIFA’s leadership, potentially paving the way for challenges to Infantino’s presidency. Following pressure from 55 UEFA member nations, as well as the CONCACAF and Asian Football Confederation, Infantino withdrew his controversial plans to commercialize World Cup profits through a subsidiary. Despite this retreat, UEFA emphasized the need to ensure such proposals cannot resurface. The next FIFA presidential election is scheduled for March in Morocco, with candidate registration closing on November 18.

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has publicly criticized Gianni Infantino, the president of FIFA, stating he is not the right person to lead world football. This comes amid ongoing controversy over Infantino's abandoned proposal to sell shares of World Cup revenue to private investors. Burnham emphasized that the plan had offended many people around the globe, including those within the football community, and warned that simply moving forward without addressing these concerns was unacceptable. The European Football Union (UEFA) announced earlier this week that it had lost confidence in FIFA’s leadership, potentially paving the way for challenges to Infantino’s presidency. The North, Central American, and Caribbean Council of Football (CONCACAF) also expressed similar sentiments, stating that FIFA’s leadership had stopped putting football first. These developments follow Infantino’s decision to backtrack on his controversial plans to sell World Cup revenues through a commercial subsidiary that would manage major FIFA competitions. Infantino was forced to abandon his proposals after 55 member nations of UEFA agreed to boycott the World Cup and all other FIFA competitions if the plan proceeded. Both CONCACAF and the Asian Football Confederation opposed the initiative. Despite Infantino retracting his proposal, UEFA stated it would work with other confederations to develop mechanisms ensuring such situations do not recur again. UEFA emphasized that no option should be excluded in this process. While Infantino has received public support from certain associations, including Qatar, the host nation of the 2022 World Cup, Burnham’s comments reflect growing dissatisfaction with Infantino’s approach. The next FIFA presidential election will take place in March in Rabat, Morocco. The deadline for candidates to register for the contest is November 18, exactly four months before the vote. In a separate development, former football star Luis Figo has called for Infantino to step down, criticizing his actions as the lowest, most deceptive, and self-serving behavior he has ever witnessed. In a column for the Daily Mail, Figo described Infantino’s conduct as an attempt to enrich himself and his friends at the expense of the game he claims to serve. He argued that the solution to FIFA’s problems requires only three words: "Infantino must go." The catalyst for recent events was the discovery of a secret project to establish a subsidiary company named FIFA Forward Enterprise. This entity was intended to assume all commercial rights to the World Cup, with a plan for a private fund, Thrive Capital led by Josh Kushner, to acquire a 20 percent stake worth $4 billion. The total value of the deal was estimated at $20 billion. National associations learned of this privatization only through media reports, and the most severe blow to Infantino came from Nyon, where UEFA unanimously voted to boycott all competitions under FIFA’s umbrella, including the men's World Cup in 2030. The crisis has intensified pressure on Infantino, who faces potential challenges to his leadership ahead of the upcoming elections. With the deadline for candidate registration approaching, the situation remains fluid as various stakeholders continue to assess their positions and strategies.

3 reports

El Universal logoEl UniversalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 805 days ago
Infantino is not the one to lead FIFA, reveals British Prime Minister; controversy continues over private capital for the World Cup

The British prime minister, Andy Burnham, stated that Gianni Infantino, president of FIFA, is not the appropriate leader to guide world football, citing the abandoned plan to sell shares of the World Cup to private investors. This criticism comes amid growing opposition to Infantino’s proposal, which was widely seen as offensive to many in the global football community. The European Football Union (UEFA) has lost confidence in FIFA’s leadership, potentially paving the way for challenges to Infantino’s presidency. Following pressure from 55 UEFA member nations, as well as the CONCACAF and Asian Football Confederation, Infantino withdrew his controversial plans to commercialize World Cup profits through a subsidiary. Despite this retreat, UEFA emphasized the need to ensure such proposals cannot resurface. The next FIFA presidential election is scheduled for March in Morocco, with candidate registration closing on November 18.

Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives, including criticisms from the UK prime minister, UEFA, and other football confederations, alongside confirmation that Infantino has withdrawn his controversial proposal. It does not favor any side but reports on the ongoing debate and reactions to the plan

Why factuality (85): The article accurately covers the British Prime Minister's comments and the UEFA's response to Infantino's plan. It aligns with other sources regarding the financial aspects and the reactions from various football organizations.

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the criticisms and responses without taking a clear stance, though it highlights the opposition to Infantino's leadership.

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 655 days ago
British Prime Minister: Infantino is not the right man to run world football

Britanski premijer Andy Burnham kritikovao je predsjednika FIFA-e Gianniego Infantinua zbog njegova prijedloga o prodaji udjela u prihodu od Svjetskog prvenstva privatnim investitorima. Burnham tvrdi da Infantino nije prava osoba za vođenje svjetskog nogometa, jer je plan izazvao široku kritiku i doveo do bojkota stranaka kao što su UEFA, CONCACAF i Azija. Nakon što su sve 55 članica UEFA-e odlučile bojkotirati Svjetsko prvenstvo i druge FIFA-ine natjecanje ako se plan usvoji, Infantino je bio prisiljen odustati od prijedloga. UEFA i druge konfederacije sada rade na mehanizmima kako bi se sprečilo ponovno pojavljivanje sličnih situacija. Iako je Infantino dobio podršku od nekoliko nacionalnih saveza, uključujući Katar, Burnhamove izjave su dodatni znak nezadovoljstva. Sljedeći izbori za predsjednika FIFA-e održat će se u marsku, s rokom za podnošenje kandidatura do 18. studenoga.

Bias read (Progressive): Artikel fokusira se na kritičku poziciju britanskog premijera prema Infantinu, što ukazuje na levi okvir. Kritika se usredotočuje na ekonomski aspekt i političke posljedice prijedloga, dok se naglasava globalna prirodna nogometne industrije. Usporedba s konfederacijama koje su izrazile nezadovoljstv

Why factuality (80): The article correctly summarizes the rejection of Infantino's plan and the subsequent withdrawal. It mentions the UEFA's loss of confidence in FIFA's leadership but does not include specific quotes from the primary source document. Some details are omitted, such as the exact wording of UEFA's ultima

Why objectivity (65): The article presents the situation in a critical light towards Infantino, using phrases like 'propalo plan' (failed plan) and 'prestalo stavljati nogomet na prvo mjesto' (stopped putting football first). While it provides factual information, the tone is somewhat biased against Infantino without pre

Siol.net logoSiol.netState / PublicProgressiveFactual 75Objective 602 days ago
Infantino under pressure called a crisis meeting, Figo:

Gianni Infantino, predsednik Mednarodne nogometne zveze (FIFA), se sooča s kritiko zaradi predloga, da bi svetovno prvenstvo odprli zasebnim vlagateljem. Zaradi tega je bil priklican krizni sestanek v Maroku, kjer so se sestavili visoki predstavniki organizacije. Kritika je narasla do take mere, da je nekdanji nogometaš Luis Figo javno predlog, da mora Infantino zapustiti svoje mesto. Figo je kritiziral Infantinovo ravnanje kot 'najnižje, najbolj prevarantsko in strahopetno sebično', ter trdil, da je potrebno, da Infantino ode. Ključna dejstva vključuje odkritje tajnega projekta FIFA Forward Enterprise, ki bi omogočil zasebnemu skladu Thrive Capital 20-odstotni delež za štiri milijarde dolarjev. Nacionalne zveze so o tem došle šele iz medijev, medtem ko je UEFA soglasno glasovala za bojkot vseh tekmovanj pod okriljem FIFA.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around FIFA's potential privatization of the World Cup as a scandal involving corruption and self-interest, aligning more closely with left-leaning critiques of corporate influence in sports governance. The emphasis on Luis Figo’s condemnation of Infantino as 'self

Why factuality (75): The article reports on an emergency meeting between FIFA officials in Morocco, citing sources like AFP and mentioning Luis Figo's public criticism. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the shelving of the private investment plan and the growing pressure on Infantino. However, some det

Why objectivity (60): The tone is somewhat sensational, using phrases like 'plaz' (which implies a surge of criticism) and emotionally charged language around Figo's comments. The article presents Figo's criticism prominently but does not balance it with counterpoints or alternative perspectives, leaning towards a critic

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories