Gianni Infantino: Another Fifa official attacks Infantino over investor plans
FIFA President Gianni Infantino faces criticism over his plans to open the world football organization to private investors. Operational Director Kevin Lamour accused Infantino of betraying employees by pursuing these investment plans unilaterally, stating they deserve more respect than being disrespected and intimidated. Lamour suggested the project should be stopped and called on political decision-makers in football to ask the right questions and make the correct decisions. Lamour stated he would not resign from his position but acknowledged potential consequences if he were to lose his job. Previously, high-ranking advisor Carlos Cordeiro had resigned in protest against Infantino's plans, emphasizing he was not involved in them. The UEFA has threatened to boycott the initiative. Infantino's plan involves allowing private investors to acquire up to a fifth of the shares in the new subsidiary FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), valued at $20 billion initially. The FFE would consolidate commercial rights to major competitions, including men's and women's World Cups and the Club World Cup. The FIFA would remain the majority shareholder and retain control over the match schedule and all規
Go to the primary sources (8)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The article reports that FIFA has abandoned investor plans, with President Gianni Infantino reportedly yielding to pressure from investors. The headline suggests that Infantino has capitulated in his efforts to secure investment proposals for FIFA. However, the article does not provide specific details about the nature of the investor plans, the extent of the pressure exerted, or any formal announcements from FIFA regarding this development.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as FIFA giving up on investor plans due to pressure from Infantino, implying a lack of resolve or strength in leadership. This suggests a critical stance toward Infantino’s leadership and decision-making, which aligns with a left-leaning perspective that often critic
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that Infantino has withdrawn the investor plans and is defending his decision, matching the consensus found in other sources.
Why objectivity (85): The article remains fairly neutral in tone, presenting both Infantino's actions and his defense of them without overtly favoring either side.
Tagesschau (ARD)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 856 days ago
The European Football Union (UEFA) has threatened to boycott all FIFA tournaments if President Gianni Infantino proceeds with plans to sell shares in the World Cup to private investors. This decision was made during an emergency meeting of all 55 national associations, where they unanimously agreed to this stance due to the exceptional circumstances. The UEFA emphasized that the World Cup should not be treated as an investment product but rather as one of the most significant and traditional football events globally. They stated that no UEFA teams would participate in FIFA competitions while these proposals remain under consideration unless the entire plan is abandoned and assurances are given that the FIFA will never again open its governance and competitions to private investors. The FIFA president had revealed these unexpected plans earlier in the week, offering member associations high sums and the prospect of an expanded World Cup to gain their support.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the UEFA's position against selling parts of the World Cup to private investors and the FIFA president's defense of his proposal. It includes quotes from both sides and does not favor one over the other, maintaining a balanced perspective.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects the UEFA statement regarding the potential boycott of FIFA events due to the investor proposal. It provides direct quotes and details from the official UEFA statement, maintaining fidelity to the source.
Why objectivity (85): The article presents the information in a neutral tone, focusing on facts and statements from UEFA without overtly taking sides or using emotionally charged language.
UEFA, the European football governing body, has unanimously decided to boycott all FIFA competitions in protest against FIFA's plan to establish a $20 billion commercial subsidiary and sell a minority stake to investors. The decision was made during a meeting of UEFA's 55 members, which rejected the proposal outright. UEFA argued that the World Cup should not be treated as an investment product and should not be subjected to private ownership. The move comes after UEFA condemned the plan shortly after it was first reported by the Financial Times and The Times. FIFA has set a deadline for member associations to either support the plan or risk losing a one-time payout. Germany's DFB president, Bernd Neuendorf, warned that without UEFA's backing, the plan would likely fail due to lack of investor interest.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the dispute between UEFA and FIFA as a principled stand against privatization and corporate influence in sports, aligning with progressive values. It emphasizes UEFA's moral stance against selling the World Cup as an investment opportunity, using strong language like 'not for sale
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects the content of the UEFA statement, including the unanimous vote to boycott and the rejection of FIFA's investor plan. It cites the exact wording from UEFA's official statement and provides context about the timeline and reactions from other sources, maintaining fideli
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on reporting facts and statements from UEFA and other credible sources. While it mentions criticisms of FIFA, it does not overtly take a political stance or use emotionally charged language.
SternIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 804 days ago
The article discusses the potential continuation of Gianni Infantino as FIFA President and explores the implications for UEFA, suggesting that UEFA may have limited options if Infantino remains in his position. The piece focuses on the political and strategic challenges faced by UEFA in relation to FIFA's leadership, particularly in the context of ongoing governance issues within international football organizations.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of the situation without overtly favoring either side. It outlines the possible outcomes for UEFA based on the continued leadership of FIFA, but does not take a clear ideological stance. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the structural and political困
Why factuality (95): The article accurately presents the situation where Infantino's continued leadership would limit UEFA's options, aligning with the broader narrative from other sources.
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a somewhat neutral tone while discussing the implications of Infantino remaining in power, though it leans slightly toward highlighting the challenges he faces.
The article discusses FIFA president Gianni Infantino's recent decision to halt plans to sell World Cup rights to investors, which came under pressure from UEFA and public backlash. While this move appears to signal a shift away from his expansionist ambitions, the author questions whether this change is genuine or merely a temporary retreat. The piece critiques the notion of 'pure football' as an idealistic concept, arguing that football has always been a commercial enterprise. It highlights how elements like fan culture, including ultras and stadium atmosphere, contribute to the economic value of the sport, reinforcing the idea that football remains fundamentally a business.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on sports governance and commercialization within football, discussing FIFA's policies and their implications for the sport. There is no clear political framing or ideological slant in the content. The critique is centered around the commercial nature of football rather than any
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on UEFA's unanimous vote to boycott FIFA competitions in response to the investor plan, quoting the exact statement from UEFA. It aligns closely with the primary source document and provides specific details about the proposal and the response.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral and factual tone, presenting the information objectively without emotional language or bias. It clearly outlines the actions taken by UEFA and the rationale behind them.
n-tvIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 858 days ago
The article reports that FIFA plans to sell tournament rights, prompting the UEFA to consider boycotting the World Cup. It highlights concerns from UEFA officials that football belongs to investors rather than the sport itself. The piece emphasizes the growing tension between governing bodies and commercial interests within international football.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a conflict between traditional governance of football and corporate influence, aligning with left-leaning critiques of privatization and commercialization in sports. The emphasis on 'Fußball gehört nicht den Investoren' (football does not belong to investors) suggests
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on the UEFA's planned crisis meeting and the general sentiment against the investor proposal, reflecting the primary source document's content without significant deviation.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the situation based on reported statements and actions without injecting personal opinions or emotional language.
Germany's football association (DFB) and Bundesliga clubs have expressed strong opposition to FIFA's plan to create a commercial subsidiary open to private investors. DFB president Bernd Neuendorf criticized the move as 'extremely problematic and unacceptable,' arguing it risks losing fan support and undermining football's integrity. Bundesliga clubs like Bayern Munich and Borussia Dortmund have also voiced concerns, with Bayern's Max Eberl calling the initiative 'disgusting' and Dortmund's Carsten Cramer warning it sends a 'disastrous message.' The controversy comes amid broader tensions between Germany and FIFA, including past disagreements over disciplinary decisions influenced by external political pressures. Germany and UEFA are expected to play a key role in deciding the fate of the proposal.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames FIFA's commercialization plans as a threat to football's integrity and independence, aligning with criticisms from German officials and clubs. The emphasis on FIFA's perceived corruption and lack of democratic processes suggests a left-leaning critique of institutional power. The抨
Why factuality (90): The article accurately summarizes the UEFA's position and the broader context of the investor proposal. It includes direct quotes from UEFA and mentions the implications of the proposal, staying close to the primary source.
Why objectivity (80): While the article remains largely objective, there is a slight leaning towards highlighting the concerns of German football officials, which could suggest a more critical stance toward FIFA.
Focus OnlineIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 655 days ago
The article reports that Gianni Infantino, the president of FIFA, has suffered a humiliating defeat. The specific circumstances of this defeat are not detailed in the provided text, but the headline suggests that Infantino faced significant setbacks, possibly related to his leadership or decisions within FIFA.
Bias read (Center): The article appears to present a neutral report on the outcome involving Gianni Infantino, focusing on the event itself rather than taking a clear stance or using biased language. There is no indication of strong ideological framing or selective sourcing.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately conveys the sentiment expressed in other media outlets that Infantino suffered a 'humiliating defeat.' There is no factual error in the reporting.
Why objectivity (65): The headline is highly emotionally charged and directly labels Infantino's situation as a 'humiliating defeat,' showing a clear lack of neutrality and balance.
Die WeltIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 90Objective 605 days ago
The article discusses controversy surrounding FIFA's plans, suggesting that they could lead to the end of Gianni Infantino's tenure. The piece highlights the growing tensions within FIFA and the potential implications of these developments for leadership changes.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around FIFA's plans in a manner that suggests criticism of current leadership structures, potentially implying a need for reform. While not explicitly endorsing any particular political agenda, the tone leans toward questioning established authority, which aligns更多
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reflects the public outcry and calls for Infantino's resignation, consistent with other reports. No factual inaccuracies are present.
Why objectivity (60): The headline is strongly critical of Infantino, suggesting his end is necessary, which shows a clear bias and lack of neutrality in tone.
Tagesschau (ARD)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 806 days ago
The FIFA has responded to criticism and threats of boycott from the UEFA and other continental football associations regarding plans to sell shares in World Cup and other tournaments to private investors. The FIFA reaffirmed its commitment to an open and democratic consultation process, stating that no one is selling football. The UEFA and CONCACAF have rejected the proposals, threatening to boycott FIFA events if they proceed. The Asian Football Confederation (AFC) expressed deep concern over the situation. FIFA emphasized its democratic principles, asserting that while members can express their resistance, no single entity can represent all 211 member associations.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the FIFA's defense of its investment plans and the criticisms from UEFA, CONCACAF, and AFC without overtly favoring either side. It reports the positions of multiple stakeholders without clear ideological slant, maintaining a balanced tone by presenting arguments from both:
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the FIFA's continued adherence to the investor proposal and the ongoing controversy, aligning with the primary source. It includes quotes from internal FIFA figures, adding depth to the narrative.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is relatively neutral, though it highlights the contrast between FIFA's stance and the UEFA's opposition, which could be seen as slightly biased in favor of FIFA.
The article discusses FIFA's plan to partially sell the World Cup to investors, which has raised concerns among European national football associations. These associations have called for an urgent meeting to address the implications of this potential sale. The move could significantly alter the structure and control of the World Cup, potentially increasing private influence over the event. This decision comes amid ongoing debates about the commercialization of major sports events and their impact on governance and fairness.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the issue neutrally, focusing on the actions of FIFA and the reactions of European national football associations without overtly favoring any side. It does not employ loaded language or selectively present information to support a particular viewpoint.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately captures the essence of the UEFA's opposition to the investor proposal and the upcoming emergency meeting, aligning with the primary source. It includes relevant context about the proposed expansion of the World Cup.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is generally neutral, though it emphasizes the urgency of the situation and the potential impact on the World Cup, which might subtly favor the UEFA's position.
Die ZeitIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 757 days ago
The European Football Union (UEFA), led by President Aleksander Ceferin, is holding an emergency meeting today to discuss recent plans by the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA). According to reports from the 'Süddeutsche Zeitung' and the BBC, the meeting aims to address FIFA's proposed investor deal involving the sale of commercial rights, potentially generating billions of dollars. The UEFA has strongly criticized this plan, warning that football should not become a plaything for investors. DFB President Bernd Neuendorf expressed concerns about losing fan support, calling the proposal problematic and unacceptable. Meanwhile, FIFA President Gianni Infantino defended the move as a unique opportunity to accelerate global football development. Czech Football Association president David Trunda, however, remains open to the idea, citing potential benefits for Czech football.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses a sports-related issue, specifically, the UEFA's reaction to FIFA's financial plans, which is inherently non-political. There is no indication of ideological framing, biased language, or selective sourcing. The content presents multiple perspectives without evident slant.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on UEFA's urgent meeting regarding FIFA's investor plans and includes statements from UEFA officials like Bernd Neuendorf. It reflects the primary source's stance that UEFA rejects the proposal and warns against commercialization. The information is consistent with the
Why objectivity (75): While the article presents the positions of various stakeholders, including UEFA and the DFB, it maintains a relatively neutral tone, though there is a slight emphasis on the concerns raised by European football associations.
Die ZeitIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 757 days ago
The European Football Association (UEFA) has called an emergency meeting of all European national football associations for Thursday to discuss FIFA President Gianni Infantino’s proposal to sell shares in the World Cup to private investors. UEFA expresses concern over this plan, which could lead to discussions about boycotting the World Cup. Norway’s football federation president, Lise Klaveness, calls the plans 'deeply concerning' and highlights longstanding concerns about lack of transparency and undue influence by state leaders and external interests within FIFA. The German Football Association (DFB) president, Bernd Neuendorf, also criticizes the move, arguing it risks making football a pawn for investors. In contrast, Infantino defends the proposal as part of a democratic consultation process, emphasizing that it is an opportunity but not a requirement, and that the creation of a new entity under FIFA control would allow for greater commercialization of football.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the debate: UEFA and national federations express concern and criticism, while FIFA President Infantino defends the proposal. There is no clear ideological leaning in the framing of the story, and the tone remains neutral, focusing on the facts and differing views.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately conveys the UEFA's stance on the investor proposal and the potential boycott, referencing the official statement. However, it also includes quotes from Bundesliga clubs and fans, which adds context but may introduce secondary sources.
Why objectivity (75): The tone leans slightly towards expressing concern and criticism of FIFA's approach, particularly through the voices of Bundesliga clubs and fans, suggesting a more critical viewpoint.
Tagesschau (ARD)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 757 days ago
The article discusses the FIFA's investor plans proposed by President Gianni Infantino, which aim to create a new entity to manage commercial activities and tournaments, with shares being sold to raise additional funds. The plan would increase financial contributions to member associations, potentially up to $24 million annually for some nations by 2038. However, the proposal has faced criticism from organizations like the UEFA, which argue that the FIFA is overstepping its role by selling the football brand for personal gain. Infantino defends the initiative as a democratic process offering participation but not obligation.
Bias read (Center): While the topic involves significant political implications regarding governance and financial control within international sports organizations, the article presents both the FIFA's proposal and the criticisms from UEFA and other continental confederations without overtly favoring one side. The phr
Why factuality (85): The article summarizes the FIFA's investor plans and includes quotes from various media outlets, aligning well with the primary source. It provides context about the controversy and international reactions accurately.
Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting multiple viewpoints and avoiding overly emotional language. It reports on both sides of the debate fairly.
Der SpiegelIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 757 days ago
The European football governing body UEFA has called an emergency meeting of all European member associations in response to FIFA’s plans to sell parts of its commercial rights, including those related to the World Cup, to investors. This move by FIFA aims to generate billions through revenue streams. UEFA has clearly expressed its opposition to these plans, with Germany’s national team president Bernd Neuendorf criticizing the proposal as potentially undermining fan acceptance and the independence of football. Norwegian Football Association President Lise Klaveness echoed this criticism, expressing deep concern over FIFA’s lack of transparency and its close ties to state leaders and external interests. She emphasized the need for collaboration between UEFA and national associations to address these issues. Spanish football federation president Javier Tebas directly criticized FIFA President Gianni Infantino, accusing him of mixing politics, discipline, money, and power without transparency. The global players’ union Fifpro also opposes the plan, highlighting the exclusion of professional athletes from decision-making processes.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames FIFA’s proposed sale of commercial rights as a threat to football’s independence and fan engagement, using strong language such as 'problematic,' 'not acceptable,' and 'personal property.' It highlights criticisms from left-leaning representatives like Lise Klaveness and Javier Te
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on UEFA calling a special session due to FIFA's investor plans and mentions the rejection of the proposal. It references the UEFA statement and quotes officials like DFB president Bernd Neuendorf, aligning closely with the primary source document. It provides specific
Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts and quotes from various stakeholders. However, there is a slight leaning toward emphasizing the negative aspects of FIFA's actions, though it remains largely objective.
Die ZeitIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 705 days ago
FIFA President Gianni Infantino faces criticism over his plans to open the world football organization to private investors. Operational Director Kevin Lamour accused Infantino of betraying employees by pursuing these investment plans unilaterally, stating they deserve more respect than being disrespected and intimidated. Lamour suggested the project should be stopped and called on political decision-makers in football to ask the right questions and make the correct decisions. Lamour stated he would not resign from his position but acknowledged potential consequences if he were to lose his job. Previously, high-ranking advisor Carlos Cordeiro had resigned in protest against Infantino's plans, emphasizing he was not involved in them. The UEFA has threatened to boycott the initiative. Infantino's plan involves allowing private investors to acquire up to a fifth of the shares in the new subsidiary FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), valued at $20 billion initially. The FFE would consolidate commercial rights to major competitions, including men's and women's World Cups and the Club World Cup. The FIFA would remain the majority shareholder and retain control over the match schedule and all規
Bias read (Center): The article reports on internal disputes within FIFA regarding proposed investment plans, focusing on operational director Kevin Lamour's criticisms of Gianni Infantino. It presents both sides of the issue without overtly favoring one perspective, using neutral language and citing multiple sources.
Why factuality (85): The article discusses the implications of the investor deal and the resulting backlash, including the UEFA boycott threat. It accurately reflects the primary source document's claims about the lack of transparency and the rejection of the proposal by UEFA and other confederations.
Why objectivity (70): The article takes a critical stance toward Infantino, suggesting that his actions were overly ambitious and secretive. While factual, the tone suggests a preference for the UEFA position over FIFA's.
The article discusses the controversy surrounding FIFA President Gianni Infantino’s proposal to sell shares in future World Cup events through a new subsidiary. European football associations, including UEFA, have boycotted the plan, arguing it lacks democratic legitimacy. The proposal, which would allow investors to share in profits from World Cups, has been rejected by most continental federations, leaving Infantino’s influence and future uncertain. The article criticizes Infantino’s motives, suggesting his plans prioritize personal gain and connections, particularly with figures like Donald Trump and his family. It highlights concerns over transparency, democratic processes, and potential conflicts of interest.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the FIFA proposal as a self-serving maneuver by Infantino, emphasizing his close ties to Trump and financial interests. It portrays the rejection of the plan as a necessary step toward democratic governance, implying that Infantino’s actions undermine the integrity of football. Ph
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the investor deal, the boycott threat by UEFA, and the political fallout. It aligns with the primary source document's claims about the proposal being rejected and the implications for the future of football. The information is consistent with the broader narrative.
Why objectivity (70): The article takes a critical stance toward Infantino, suggesting that his motives are self-serving. While factual, the tone implies a preference for the UEFA position over FIFA's.
Der SpiegelIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 656 days ago
The European football association UEFA has unanimously decided to boycott all FIFA tournaments if FIFA President Gianni Infantino proceeds with selling shares in World Cup and other FIFA competitions to private investors. During an emergency meeting, all 55 representatives of UEFA voted in favor of this decision. UEFA argues that the World Cup should not be treated as an investment product but rather as a legacy of football. The plan was triggered by the announcement of FIFA’s investor proposal, which aims to raise billions through the sale of tournament revenue shares. Infantino has set a deadline of September 19 for member associations to approve the plan, requiring a simple majority among the 211 member associations. German Football Association president Bernd Neuendorf criticized the move, calling it a dangerous signal that could turn football into a commodity for investors. Infantino defended the initiative as a unique opportunity to accelerate global football development.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the UEFA boycott as a principled stand against commercialization, emphasizing the cultural and societal value of football. It highlights criticism from UEFA officials and Germany’s national team president, portraying the FIFA plan as a threat to football’s integrity. The tone and措
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the UEFA statement rejecting FIFA's proposal to transfer ownership interests to private investors. It mentions the unanimous stance of UEFA's 55 members and the threat of boycotting FIFA competitions. However, it includes some details about the proposed financial incen
Why objectivity (65): The tone of the article leans towards presenting UEFA's position as strong and justified, while the criticism of Infantino's plan is framed more sympathetically. There is a slight bias toward UEFA's perspective, though it remains largely factual.
European football associations have unanimously decided to support a boycott of the World Cup if FIFA President Gianni Infantino's plan to sell shares of the tournament to private investors is implemented. This decision has been widely reported by international media, including The Sun, The Guardian, RMC SPORT, and AS, which describe it as a significant escalation in the conflict between UEFA and FIFA. The plans by Infantino, aimed at increasing revenue through commercialization, have faced strong opposition from European football leaders who view them as financially exploitative. The unified stance of UEFA's 55 member associations signals a major challenge for Infantino's agenda.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced compilation of international media reactions to the UEFA-FIFA dispute over commercialization plans. It does not take a clear ideological stance but reports on the consensus among European football associations against Infantino's proposals. The framing remains neutral
Why factuality (85): The article reports on the UEFA's rejection of FIFA's investor proposal and the resulting threat of boycotting FIFA events, aligning closely with the primary source document. However, it uses emotionally charged language like 'Paukenschlag' and 'brutale Reaktion', which could imply bias towards UEFA
Why objectivity (60): The tone is strongly supportive of UEFA's actions, using phrases like 'Gianni Infantino muss gehen' and 'brutale Reaktion', indicating a pro-UEFA perspective rather than a neutral reporting.
Tagesschau (ARD)State / PublicCenterFactual 80Objective 755 days ago
The article reports that the FIFA is pushing forward with plans to expand the FIFA World Cup to 64 teams. According to documents obtained by outlets like The Guardian, ESPN, and Sky News, FIFA intends to commission an independent firm to analyze the potential impact of this expansion. The firm would be selected by August 14 and granted four weeks to conduct the study. The plan follows heated debates over former FIFA President Gianni Infantino’s investor proposal, which failed. The proposed deal aimed to generate billions through the sale of commercial rights, prompting threats of a World Cup boycott from the European Football Association (UEFA), with support from other confederations. The 2030 final, currently planned to take place from June 8 to July 21, would already be the longest World Cup in history if expanded to 48 teams during the 2026 tournament hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico. South American Confederation president Alejandro Domínguez supports the expansion, envisioning additional matches in Uruguay, Argentina, and Paraguay, with most games held in Spain, Portugal, and Morocco.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about FIFA's plans for expanding the World Cup without overtly endorsing or criticizing the move. It provides balanced reporting by mentioning both the push for expansion and the previous controversies surrounding FIFA leadership. While the topic involves significant
Why factuality (80): The article reports on Kevin Lamour's criticism of Gianni Infantino's investor plans, citing internal documents and statements. It aligns with the primary source document's assertion that UEFA and its members oppose the proposal. The information is consistent with the broader narrative of resistance
Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat critical of Infantino, particularly in describing his actions as a 'solo move.' While it presents the facts, it carries a subtle bias against the FIFA president.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Germany
