In the ongoing corruption and money laundering trial of former National Assembly speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula, a pivotal moment occurred on Tuesday as the court turned its attention to the motivations behind alleged payments totaling R4.5 million. The focus of the hearing shifted from the nature of the financial transactions themselves to the intent behind them, particularly as the defense challenged the credibility of the State’s key witness, Nombasa Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu. Judge Mashudu Munzhelele intervened in the cross-examination, pressing Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu on the rationale behind the substantial sums she allegedly paid to Mapisa-Nqakula, who was then the minister of defence. The judge questioned whether these payments were made in exchange for favors, prompting Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu to assert that they were not intended to secure any personal benefit. Instead, she explained that the payments were made due to Mapisa-Nqakula’s influential position and to maintain a positive working relationship with the Department of Defence. The trial, taking place in the Gauteng Division of the High Court in Pretoria, has centered on allegations that Mapisa-Nqakula solicited or accepted bribes from Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu, who is the sole director of logistics company Umkhombe Marine. The State claims that between December 2016 and July 2019, Mapisa-Nqakula received approximately R4.5 million from Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu. Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu is testifying under an indemnity agreement with the National Prosecuting Authority’s Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (Idac), and her testimony is considered crucial to the prosecution’s case. During the cross-examination by senior counsel Siyabulela Maphoma, representing the defense, discrepancies emerged between the statements made by Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu and those previously given by UDM leader Bantu Holomisa, the first State witness. Maphoma pointed out that certain transactions were detailed in Holomisa’s account but omitted from Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu’s testimony, while other details surfaced only during her current testimony. This inconsistency raised questions about the reliability of the evidence presented thus far. When confronted with the discrepancy regarding an alleged R2-million request that Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu did not disclose to Holomisa, she stated that she saw no necessity to inform him of that particular detail. However, Maphoma challenged her on whether the charge sheet accurately reflected the full extent of the alleged interactions. The defense also revisited the initial meeting between Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu and Mapisa-Nqakula, which took place in December 2016 at the InterContinental Hotel at OR Tambo International Airport. Earlier in her testimony, Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu recounted arranging the meeting through a retired general and family friend who had connections with Mapisa-Nqakula. She stated that she sought the meeting after making a R300,000 payment to the late secretary for defence, Dr Sam Gulube, who had been directed to her by Mapisa-Nqakula. Barely a week after this payment, Gulube requested an additional R400,000, prompting Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu to seek direct contact with Mapisa-Nqakula to confirm the legitimacy of these requests. As the trial progressed, the courtroom heard details of the complex relationship between Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu and Mapisa-Nqakula, extending beyond mere financial dealings. Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu described their relationship as one of mutual trust, where she provided spiritual guidance to Mapisa-Nqakula during times of political uncertainty. She recounted instances where Mapisa-Nqakula sought her advice on political strategies and personal issues, even offering guidance when Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu faced legal troubles stemming from investigations into her company’s tender processes with the South African National Defence Force (SANDF). The court also heard about specific incidents involving coded language used in their communications. Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu testified that Mapisa-Nqakula employed terms such as “padkos,” “wig,” and references to the African sage to discuss financial matters discreetly. One notable instance involved a R200,000 payment made directly to Mapisa-Nqakula, which Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu described as a response to pressure from the minister. Additionally, she mentioned a point where Mapisa-Nqakula allegedly requested a R2-million bribe to facilitate the promotion of Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu’s husband within the SANDF. However, she stated that she ultimately decided not to comply with this request, believing her husband would receive the promotion based on his merits rather than through illicit means. The defense’s cross-examination of Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu continued to scrutinize the consistency of her accounts, highlighting potential contradictions and selective disclosures. As the trial moves forward, the defense is expected to present its arguments against the charges, potentially challenging the credibility of the prosecution’s case and the reliability of Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu’s testimony. The court has ordered that Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu may be identified by name but not photographed, filmed, or have her testimony broadcast during her time on the witness stand. The upcoming days will likely see further revelations and challenges as both sides continue to build their cases in the high-profile trial.
8 reports
Daily MaverickIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 853 days agoIn the ongoing corruption and money laundering trial of former National Assembly speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula, the focus shifted during Tuesday's proceedings to the motive behind alleged R4.5 million in payments she supposedly received from Nombasa Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu, a logistics company director. The defense challenged Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu's testimony, pointing out inconsistencies in her account and questioning whether the payments were made for personal gain or to maintain a professional relationship with Mapisa-Nqakula, who was then the Minister of Defence. Judge Mashudu Munzhelele probed further, asking why Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu would make such payments without expecting favors. Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu claimed the payments were due to Mapisa-Nqakula's influence and to preserve a good working relationship with the Department of Defence. Additionally, the defense raised concerns over selective disclosure, noting that Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu did not inform UDM leader Bantu Holomisa about all the alleged payments, particularly a R2-million request.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the legal proceedings, presenting both the prosecution's claims and the defense's challenges to the key witness's credibility. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or favor one side over the other, focusing instead on the courtroom dynamics and the诘问
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the courtroom exchanges, including the judge's questions to the witness and the defense's arguments. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the trial's developments.
Why objectivity (85): The article remains objective, presenting both the prosecution's and defense's perspectives without favoring either side. It focuses on the legal process and the judge's role.
Daily MaverickIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 854 days ago IN THE DOCK: Bones, bribes and betrayal — witness details deep bond with ex-minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-NqakulaFormer South African defence minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula is on trial for corruption and money laundering charges, with testimony revealing a close personal and professional relationship with businesswoman Nombasa Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu. Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu described how she provided spiritual guidance to Mapisa-Nqakula, including using traditional bone-throwing rituals to predict outcomes related to political decisions, such as potential Cabinet changes under former President Jacob Zuma. The testimony also detailed financial transactions involving millions of rand linked to SANDF tenders and a R79-million contract awarded to Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu's logistics firm. Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu admitted to making multiple cash payments to Mapisa-Nqakula and confiding in her sister about the situation, though she withheld some details to avoid burdening her. Mapisa-Nqakula denies the allegations and faces 13 counts.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual courtroom testimony without overtly biased language or selective emphasis. It reports on the legal proceedings and witness accounts neutrally, without apparent ideological framing or favoritism toward either side of the case.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the witness's testimony about the personal and spiritual relationship with Mapisa-Nqakula, including the bone-throwing ritual. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and presents the facts accurately.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the witness's account without taking sides. It focuses on the details of the relationship and the spiritual elements of the testimony.
Daily MaverickIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 857 days ago CORRUPTION TRIAL : I paid Mapisa-Nqakula hundreds of thousands after landing R79m deal, witness tells courtThe corruption trial of former South African National Assembly Speaker and Defence Minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula took a new turn as businesswoman Nombasa Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu testified in court about a R104-million defense logistics contract awarded to her company, Umkhombe Marine. The contract was later suspended, leading Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu to sue the military. Before the case reached a judge, military officials allegedly offered her a smaller R79-million contract in exchange for dropping the lawsuit. Following this, she claims she was asked for multiple cash payments totaling around R4.5 million by Mapisa-Nqakula during her tenure as Defence Minister. Mapisa-Nqakula denies these allegations and faces charges of corruption and money laundering.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the testimony provided by Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from the witness and outlines the legal proceedings impartially. There is no evident editorializing or biased language that would suggest a particular傾
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the events of the trial, including the R104-million contract, the suspension of the contract, and the subsequent payments. It matches the cross-source consensus in its reporting.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral stance, presenting the witness's testimony and the defense's challenges without apparent bias. It focuses on the procedural aspects of the trial.
Daily MaverickIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 859 days ago ON TRIAL : Cash, codes and a wig: Mapisa-Nqakula finally faces her corruption trialFormer South African National Assembly Speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula has begun her corruption trial in Pretoria, facing 12 counts of corruption and one count of money laundering related to her tenure as defense minister from 2016 to 2019. The prosecution alleges that during this period, she requested R4.55 million in cash and other benefits from Nombasa Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu, the director of logistics firm Umkhombe Marine. This follows a R104-million SANDF logistics contract awarded to Umkhombe Marine in 2016, which was reportedly suspended shortly after being granted. The trial details include claims that Mapisa-Nqakula used intermediaries, coded language, and private meetings to make these requests, starting with a R300,000 demand in November 2016. Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu, protected by legal immunity, is set to testify later in the trial.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a high-profile corruption trial involving a former national leader without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the allegations, the nature of the charges, and the procedural aspects of the trial without using biased language or selectively omit-
Why factuality (90): The article provides detailed information about the trial, including the timeline, the charges, and the specifics of the R104-million contract. This aligns well with the cross-source consensus and presents the facts accurately.
Why objectivity (85): The article remains largely objective, focusing on the facts of the trial and the testimonies presented. It avoids taking sides but does include some descriptive language about Mapisa-Nqakula's demeanor.
IOL (Independent Online)Party-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 804 days agoIn the trial of former South African parliament speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula, witness Nombasa Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu testified about alleged bribery schemes involving coded language. As the sole director of Umkhombe Marine Pty Ltd, Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu secured a R79 million contract with the South African National Defence Force (SANDF). She claims she paid Mapisa-Nqakula R4.5 million in bribes, with some payments disguised as gifts. The witness described how Mapisa-Nqakula used coded terms like 'padkos', 'wig', and references to African sage to request money. Payments began after she won a replacement contract following the termination of her initial contract. Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu alleges that Mapisa-Nqakula demanded a R2 million bribe to promote her husband within the SANDF, which she refused. Mapisa-Nqakula has denied all charges.
Bias read (Center): The article presents testimony from a witness against Mapisa-Nqakula without overtly favoring either side. It reports allegations without clear editorializing, presenting both the accusations and the defendant's denial. While the subject is politically charged due to involvement with high-level官员, 该
Why factuality (85): The article accurately conveys the witness's account of the alleged bribes, the use of coded language, and the specific amounts involved. It aligns with the cross-source consensus but omits some contextual details present in other articles.
Why objectivity (80): The article is generally neutral but includes phrases like 'alleged bribery scheme' and 'allegedly confirmed she had received the money,' which emphasize the unproven nature of the allegations.
IOL (Independent Online)Party-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 804 days ago Key witness reveals alleged bribes in Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula's corruption trialIn the corruption trial of former South African Parliament Speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula, a key witness named Nombasa Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu testified about alleged bribes she paid to the former minister. As the sole director of Umkhombe Marine Pty Ltd, Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu secured a R79 million contract with the South African National Defence Force (SANDF). She described using coded language, including terms like 'padkos', 'wig', and references to African sage, to discuss payments. The former minister allegedly requested cash payments totaling R4.5 million, with R2.1 million received in cash. Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu initially complied with several requests, including paying R300,000 and R400,000, but refused to pay a R2 million bribe for her husband’s promotion due to his work performance. The prosecution plans to call 28 witnesses, and the court has warned against recording the testimony.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the testimony of a key witness in a high-profile corruption trial without overtly favoring either side. It reports the allegations against Mapisa-Nqakula objectively, detailing the claims made by the witness without expressing judgment or taking a clear ideological stance. While
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the key points of the trial, including the allegations of bribes, the role of Nombasa Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu as a witness, and the specific amounts mentioned. It aligns closely with the cross-source consensus found in other articles.
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting facts without overt bias. However, it uses terms like 'alleged bribes' and 'alleged bribery scheme,' which indicate the nature of the accusations rather than proven facts.
News24IndependentCenterFactual 0Objective 05 days agoA former manager at First National Bank (FNB) has appeared in court charged with corruption and money laundering involving approximately R87 million. The case highlights allegations of financial misconduct within a major South African banking institution. The individual faces legal proceedings related to the misuse of funds and illicit financial activities. This development underscores ongoing concerns about corporate accountability and financial integrity in the banking sector.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual charges against a former bank employee without overtly endorsing or criticizing any political stance. It focuses on the legal matter rather than taking a clear ideological position, thus maintaining a balanced frame.
Why factuality (0): The article is unrelated to the corruption trial of Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula and discusses a different individual facing charges. Therefore, it cannot be evaluated in relation to the cross-source consensus of the other articles.
Why objectivity (0): The article is unrelated to the corruption trial of Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula and discusses a different individual facing charges. Therefore, it cannot be evaluated in relation to the cross-source consensus of the other articles.
News24IndependentProgressive10 hr. ago VIP protector places Mapisa-Nqakula at airport hotel on day of alleged R300k ‘wig’ paymentThe article reports that a VIP protector placed President Cyril Ramaphosa's Chief of Staff, Joe Masika (Mapisa-Nqakula), at an airport hotel on the day of an alleged R300,000 'wig' payment. The term 'wig' is commonly used in South African political slang to refer to bribes or illicit payments. The placement of Mapisa-Nqakula at the hotel is suggested to be connected to this alleged transaction, though no direct evidence or confirmation is provided. The incident has raised questions about potential corruption or unethical conduct within the administration.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the placement of Mapisa-Nqakula at the hotel as potentially linked to an illicit payment, implying possible wrongdoing. While it does not explicitly accuse any individual, the use of terms like 'alleged' and the focus on a high-profile figure suggest a left-leaning perspective, as
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
ZA
