Imputed for the fatal fall of a girl in Las Condes: Jorge Constanzo remains in prison and the Prosecutor's Office details his alcohol consumption

La TerceraIndependent🔒Center4 hr. ago

The Chilean prosecution has requested preventive detention for several individuals involved in the Sartor financial case, including brothers Pedro Pablo and Carlos Larraín Mery, who were major shareholders and executives of the now-defunct financial firm. The case involves multiple charges such as fraud, money laundering, and breach of disclosure obligations related to a stock acquisition in December 2024. The investigation began in 2024 after regulatory authorities suspended new investments and withdrawals due to concerns over the misuse of client funds for private business ventures. The Financial Market Commission intervened later that year, appointing a liquidator, and imposed fines totaling 367,500 UF on eight executives, with Pedro Pablo Larraín receiving the largest penalty of 80,000 UF. A hearing scheduled for July 30 will formally charge 11 people, with the prosecution seeking at least five preventive detentions.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of legal proceedings involving financial misconduct and does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on the charges, legal actions, and penalties without apparent ideological framing.

La TerceraIndependent🔒Center10 hr. ago

The article reports on the legal proceedings against Jorge Constanzo, a 39-year-old architect accused of causing the death of his two-year-old daughter, Isidora, who fell from the 11th floor of an apartment building in Las Condes on May 17, 2026. Constanzo was under investigation for homicide by omission, with prosecutors alleging that his consumption of alcohol prior to the incident contributed to the tragedy. During a court hearing, the judge rejected a request to modify his preventive detention, maintaining his imprisonment. Prosecutors provided evidence including a receipt showing Constanzo consumed four pisco sours and a glass of wine, along with documentation of his driving to and from a restaurant where the family was present. The prosecution argued that Constanzo drove while intoxicated, leading to the tragic outcome. While the court initially classified the act as a negligent behavior rather than intentional homicide, the higher court upheld the preventive detention order, keeping Constanzo in custody at the Casablanca Pretrial Detention Center.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the legal case against Jorge Constanzo, detailing both the prosecution’s arguments and the court’s decision. It does not take a clear ideological stance but focuses on the factual progression of the case, including the legal interpretations and judicial re-