ON
← Back to feed
And in Paz's problem with illegal waste: "13,000 tons. Six years. 0 responsible, 0 arrested, 0 convicted"
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive6 days ago

And in Paz's problem with illegal waste: "13,000 tons. Six years. 0 responsible, 0 arrested, 0 convicted"

The article reports on an ongoing issue of illegal waste dumping in Pazin, Croatia, specifically at the former Istraplastica site, where approximately 13,000 tons of waste remain unaddressed after six years. No responsible parties have been identified, nor have any legal actions been taken. A resident, Ivan Gustin, has publicly raised concerns through social media, highlighting the environmental and health risks posed by the waste, including infectious material from farms. The cleanup project was initiated in late 2023 by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund, in collaboration with the Ministry of Environment and Green Transition and the City of Pazin. The estimated cost for removal and disposal is around €8.1 million including VAT. This location is one of six priority sites under the updated Waste Management Plan for 2023–2028. The ministry states that cleanups are being prepared to protect public interest and health, with funding split between the fund and local authorities.

In the heart of Croatia’s Karlovač region, environmental activists known as the Karlovački Rangeri have issued a stark warning about the scale of illegal waste dumping across the area. According to their latest report, there are more than 1,000 such sites surrounding the city of Karlovač, with some locations resembling the infamous case of Lika. The group has accused local authorities of dismissing their earlier warnings, even mocking them, before turning around to label themselves as environmental champions. Their message is clear: the system of waste management in Croatia is failing, and the legal framework is inadequate to address the growing crisis. The Rangeri claim they have documented hundreds of illegal dumpsites over the years, many of which they have cleaned themselves. However, they argue that each site they clean is quickly replaced by ten new ones. This cycle, they say, reflects deeper systemic failures, both in how waste is managed and in the judicial system that fails to hold responsible parties accountable. They point to the lack of effective enforcement and the absence of meaningful legal consequences for those who illegally dispose of waste. Their report highlights that the issue is not just local but national, affecting communities throughout Croatia. The situation in Lika has once again brought the issue of illegal waste disposal into sharp focus. In recent weeks, the town of Lika became a focal point of public outrage after images emerged showing massive piles of garbage dumped in open fields. The incident sparked widespread condemnation and renewed calls for action. The Karlovački Rangeri have linked the Lika case to broader problems in the country, noting that similar situations exist in multiple regions, including Karlovač. They warn that unless urgent measures are taken, these issues will continue to worsen. Meanwhile, in Gospić, officials are preparing for an extraordinary session of the Parliamentary Committee for Environmental Protection and Nature Conservation. Scheduled for Monday, the meeting will address the illegal dumping of approximately 37,000 tons of waste, much of which was found near the former PPK Velebit facility in Bilajsko Street. The committee has called for information from two ministers and the head of state prosecution, Ivan Turudić. Among the key topics on the agenda is the potential for a public hearing involving officials responsible for the issue, as well as proposals to introduce ecocide as a criminal offense under the Criminal Code. The scale of the problem is staggering. Over 33,000 tons of waste were buried at the site, primarily consisting of industrial materials, plastics, textiles, and metals. Microplastics, elevated concentrations of heavy metals, and toxic properties have been detected in the groundwater downstream of the site. Although the water is not part of the public water supply system, the contamination poses serious risks to both human health and the environment. The site is one of six priority areas identified in the updated Waste Management Plan for the period 2023–2028, highlighting its significance in the national context. Environmental advocates and political figures have responded with increasing urgency. Dušica Radojčić, president of the parliamentary committee, has called for a public hearing to determine responsibility for the failure to prevent the illegal dumping of waste. She questions how 600 trucks of waste could cross the border without anyone checking them, and she demands transparency from all relevant institutions, from ministries to the State Inspectorate. Radojčić also emphasizes the need for health risk assessments and ongoing monitoring of affected communities, stressing that residents deserve to know whether their safety is compromised. Political tensions are rising as opposition groups accuse the ruling government of negligence. Sandra Benčić, coordinator of the Možemo! initiative, has pointed to the exponential increase in waste imports during the tenure of Prime Minister Andrej Plenković. She argues that this trend reflects a deliberate policy choice rather than accidental oversight. Her comments align with broader concerns that the current administration has failed to protect the environment and has allowed the country to become a dumping ground for foreign waste. In Pazin, another town grappling with the consequences of illegal waste disposal, the situation remains unresolved. The waste from the former Istraplastica factory has not yet been removed, despite efforts by the Environmental Fund and local authorities. One resident, Ivan Guštin, has publicly criticized the lack of progress, noting that over 13,000 tons of waste have remained unaddressed for six years. He highlights the absence of accountability, with zero convictions, zero investigations, and zero responsible parties. The estimated cost of cleaning up the site is around €8.1 million, underscoring the financial burden placed on taxpayers. As the debate intensifies, the question remains: who is ultimately responsible for the crisis? Activists, politicians, and citizens alike are demanding answers, pointing fingers at both local and national levels of governance. With the legal and institutional frameworks clearly insufficient, the challenge ahead is not just to clean up existing sites but to reform the entire system of waste management. Whether through legislative changes, increased enforcement, or public mobilization, the path forward requires collective effort and decisive action. For now, the focus remains on holding those in power accountable and ensuring that future generations inherit a cleaner, healthier environment.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

5 reports

Net.hr logoNet.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 856 days ago
Shockingly from Karlovci: 'We have several Likes! There are more than 1000 wild dumps around the city'

The Karlovački Rangeri, a local environmental group in Croatia, have once again raised concerns about the widespread issue of illegal waste dumping in the area around Karlovac. They report having identified hundreds of such sites, some of which they have cleaned themselves, but note that new sites continue to emerge due to systemic failures in waste management. The group highlights that over 1,000 illegal dumpsites exist in the region, emphasizing the need for urgent action. They reference recent pollution incidents in Lika as a wake-up call, stating that while it was unfortunate that it took an event like this to raise awareness, the situation is now critical. The Rangers urge citizens to join them in inspecting problematic locations and to take responsibility for protecting nature, appealing to all individuals regardless of background to act together for the sake of future generations.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue of illegal waste dumping as a systemic failure requiring collective action, aligning with progressive environmental advocacy. While the issue itself is politically charged, the tone emphasizes grassroots activism and calls for broader societal change rather than partisan

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the claim from KAportal that there are over 1,000 illegal waste dumps around Karlovac and references the Rangers’ statement about the situation being exacerbated by the ecological disaster in Gospić. It also includes direct quotes from the Rangers regarding the cycle o

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting the Rangers’ statements without overt bias. However, it does include some emotionally charged phrases like 'Šokantno iz Karlovca' ('Shocking from Karlovac') and uses terms like 'veliki aktivisti' ('big activists'), which could be seen as sl

tportal logotportalIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 806 days ago
The House Committee on the Environment is holding an emergency session.

The Extraordinary Session of the Parliamentary Committee for Environmental Protection and Nature Conservation in Gospić focuses on illegal waste dumping, where approximately 37,000 tons of waste have been identified, with nearly 33,000 tons buried. The session, postponed due to a catastrophic fire in Omis, involves ministers of environment and health, as well as state prosecutors, discussing potential public hearings and legal measures against environmental crimes. A proposal to include 'ecocide' as a criminal offense in the Criminal Code is under consideration. Political figures, including leaders from opposition parties, have called for urgent action, suggesting that Prime Minister Andrej Plenković has failed to address the crisis adequately.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a political failure by the ruling government, emphasizing calls for emergency sessions and public hearings, while highlighting the lack of action by Prime Minister Plenković. It presents the environmental crisis as a matter of national urgency requiring political and,

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reflects the Rangers’ claims about the number of illegal waste dumps in Karlovac and surrounding areas, citing the exact figure of over 1,000. It also includes direct quotes from the Rangers about the cycle of cleaning and re-emerging waste sites. The reference to 'Lika' is in

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the Rangers’ statements in a largely neutral manner, focusing on their observations and concerns. However, it includes phrases such as 'smijali su nam se i prijetili' ('they laughed at us and threatened us'), which may introduce an element of emotional language, albeit based on

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 726 days ago
When we warned them, they laughed and threatened us.

The Karlovački Rangeri, an environmental group based in Karlovac, Croatia, have raised concerns about the widespread issue of illegal waste dumping in their region. They claim to have identified hundreds of unauthorized landfills, estimating over a thousand such sites in Karlovac and surrounding areas. The Rangers highlighted that previous warnings were met with mockery, insults, and threats, but now they are being recognized as activists and experts in environmental protection. They argue that the current system of waste management in Croatia is dysfunctional, pointing to flaws in legislation and judicial processes. The group criticized the recent case in Gospić, noting that similar problems exist in Karlovačka županija, and warned that if action is not taken soon, the situation could worsen. They called on citizens to join them in identifying and reporting illegal dumping sites, emphasizing that this is a shared responsibility to protect nature and future generations.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the concerns of the Karlovački Rangeri regarding illegal waste dumping and systemic issues in Croatia's waste management policies. It does not exhibit clear ideological bias, as it reports the group's claims and criticisms without overtly favoring any political stance. The focus

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the same event as the primary source document, discussing the issue of illegal waste dumping in Lika and the response from Karlovački Rangeri. It provides specific details about the scale of the problem, including hundreds of illegal dumpsites and the failure of the waste mana

Why objectivity (72): The tone is somewhat confrontational, using phrases like 'smijali su nam se, vrijeđali su nas, prijetili', which implies criticism towards local authorities. While the content is factual, the language carries a sense of frustration and anger toward the government, which affects objectivity.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7011 days ago
And in Paz's problem with illegal waste: "13,000 tons. Six years. 0 responsible, 0 arrested, 0 convicted"

The article reports on an ongoing issue of illegal waste dumping in Pazin, Croatia, specifically at the former Istraplastica site, where approximately 13,000 tons of waste remain unaddressed after six years. No responsible parties have been identified, nor have any legal actions been taken. A resident, Ivan Gustin, has publicly raised concerns through social media, highlighting the environmental and health risks posed by the waste, including infectious material from farms. The cleanup project was initiated in late 2023 by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund, in collaboration with the Ministry of Environment and Green Transition and the City of Pazin. The estimated cost for removal and disposal is around €8.1 million including VAT. This location is one of six priority sites under the updated Waste Management Plan for 2023–2028. The ministry states that cleanups are being prepared to protect public interest and health, with funding split between the fund and local authorities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of an environmental issue without overtly criticizing or praising specific political actors. It provides information on the involvement of multiple governmental entities and outlines the financial and procedural aspects of the cleanup effort. While the issue is

Why factuality (80): The article discusses the similar issue of illegal waste in Pazin, citing a citizen's Facebook post and providing some background on the cleanup project. While it raises valid points, it lacks detailed verification of the claims made by the citizen and does not provide comprehensive data on the situ

Why objectivity (70): The article has a somewhat biased tone, highlighting the lack of accountability in Pazin while drawing comparisons to the situation in Gospić. It leans more towards raising awareness of the issue rather than maintaining strict neutrality.

Novi list logoNovi listIndependentProgressiveFactual 60Objective 656 days ago
Radojčić asks for a public hearing for illegal waste in Gospić: Croatian Eldorado for other people's waste

The president of the Parliamentary Committee for Environmental Protection and Nature, Dušica Radojčić, has called for a public hearing to investigate the illegal dumping of at least 37,000 tons of hazardous waste in Gospić. She questions why over 600 trucks carrying waste were allowed to cross the border without inspection and criticizes the lack of action by oversight agencies. Radojčić emphasizes the need to determine accountability across all relevant institutions, from the Ministry to environmental protection agencies. She also stresses the importance of assessing health risks to the local population and implementing health monitoring. Additionally, she highlights the broader issue of illegal waste disposal in Croatia, describing the country as an 'Eldorado' for those seeking to dispose of waste without facing consequences.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a systemic failure of government oversight and emphasizes the need for accountability, health risk assessments, and stronger parliamentary scrutiny. The tone is critical of institutional inaction and highlights the impact on citizens, aligning with progressive stg

Why factuality (60): This article focuses primarily on Dušica Radojčić’s call for a public hearing regarding the illegal waste dump in Gospić, which is not directly mentioned in the primary source. While it discusses the scale of the issue (37,000 tons of waste), this information is not present in the original document.

Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear political tone, emphasizing Radojčić’s concerns and framing the issue as a matter of parliamentary oversight and accountability. This introduces a degree of subjectivity, especially when highlighting her questions about institutional failures without providing balanced perspe

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories