ON
← Back to feed
I Have Two 9-Year-Olds by Two Different Women. Now the Whole Thing is About to Blow Up.
United States🏛️ Politics

I Have Two 9-Year-Olds by Two Different Women. Now the Whole Thing is About to Blow Up.

This article features a letter to Slate's 'Care and Feeding' parenting advice column from a father who has two nine-year-old daughters born to different women due to an affair during his first marriage. He explains that he underwent a vasectomy after the divorce and currently pays child support but has limited visitation rights. Both mothers are now demanding 50/50 custody arrangements, creating logistical conflicts regarding his living situation and the children's compatibility. The columnist responds by emphasizing the father's responsibility for the complex family structure he created through infidelity and unprotected sex, noting that the resulting difficulties are primarily his burden to manage.

Two separate legal inquiries regarding family obligations and custody arrangements have surfaced in recent correspondence. One individual seeks clarification on whether a former spouse is legally bound to fulfill a financial promise made prior to a divorce. The second inquiry involves a father navigating complex custody disputes involving two young daughters born to different women during his marriage. In the first case, a woman describes a situation where her ex-husband agreed to manage twenty thousand dollars for each of their daughters. The funds originally belonged to her former mother-in-law, who entrusted the money to the husband for investment purposes specifically for the children’s benefit. Following the dissolution of the marriage, the husband has refused to release the capital. The woman questions whether he retains a legal obligation to honor that initial agreement despite the change in marital status. The second scenario involves a man who fathered two nine-year-old girls, identified as Amelia and Bianca, through separate relationships. He conceived Amelia with his then-wife and Bianca with an independent sex worker while his wife was already pregnant. Paternity testing confirmed his biological link to Bianca, prompting his wife to file for divorce after initially considering forgiveness for the infidelity. Since the separation, the father has undergone a vasectomy to prevent further expansion of his parental responsibilities. He currently pays child support for both children but maintains limited contact, seeing each daughter for a few hours every other Saturday. Both mothers are now demanding fifty-fifty physical custody. The father faces logistical challenges due to living in a two-bedroom condominium. His ex-wife asserts that Amelia requires a private room due to a suspected autism diagnosis, a claim the father disputes based on a lack of observed evidence. The two girls reportedly struggle to interact peacefully. Amelia criticizes Bianca for consuming sugary drinks and lacking reading habits, while Bianca mocks Amelia for lacking technology access and modern cultural knowledge. The girls also exchange insults regarding their respective mothers. A parenting columnist advised the father to accept the increased responsibility resulting from his previous actions. The response emphasized that the difficulty stems directly from his choices to cheat and engage in unprotected intercourse. The columnist recommended alternating weekly visits to allow the father to develop parenting skills with each child individually before attempting to house them together. Professional family therapy was suggested to help the girls build mutual respect. The advice concluded that the father must prioritize the children’s adjustment over his personal preference for freedom, noting that consistent presence is a standard aspect of parenthood.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

MarketWatch logoMarketWatchIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 70
My abusive ex-husband promised $20,000 for our kids’ education. Now he refuses to pay. Is he legally obligated?

A reader asks whether her ex-husband is legally required to fulfill a pre-divorce promise to invest $20,000 for each of their two daughters' education. The funds were originally entrusted by the reader’s former mother-in-law to the ex-husband for investment purposes. The inquiry seeks clarification on the legal obligations surrounding this specific financial arrangement.

Bias read (Center): The content is a personal legal question regarding family finance and contract enforcement. It lacks any connection to government policy, elections, or public administration, making it apolitical.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (70): The title uses strong emotional language ('abusive ex-husband') which frames the narrative negatively before the reader sees the details. While common in personal finance columns seeking engagement, it introduces a bias that contrasts with the neutral tone usually expected in objective reporting.

Slate logoSlateIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 60
I Have Two 9-Year-Olds by Two Different Women. Now the Whole Thing is About to Blow Up.

This article features a letter to Slate's 'Care and Feeding' parenting advice column from a father who has two nine-year-old daughters born to different women due to an affair during his first marriage. He explains that he underwent a vasectomy after the divorce and currently pays child support but has limited visitation rights. Both mothers are now demanding 50/50 custody arrangements, creating logistical conflicts regarding his living situation and the children's compatibility. The columnist responds by emphasizing the father's responsibility for the complex family structure he created through infidelity and unprotected sex, noting that the resulting difficulties are primarily his burden to manage.

Bias read (Center): The article discusses personal family dynamics, legal custody disputes, and parenting advice. It does not involve government policy, elections, or public officials. Therefore, it is apolitical and assigned a center lean.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (60): The writing style is inherently subjective and opinionated, typical of the 'Care and Feeding' column format. It uses colloquialisms ('drew the short straw', 'bad guy') and presents a highly specific, somewhat dramatic personal anecdote rather than a neutral account. The tone is conversational and le

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories