ON
← Back to feed
I have seen the ‘sex faces’ of nearly every working actor, and I really don’t want to
Australia🎭 Culture7 hr. ago

I have seen the ‘sex faces’ of nearly every working actor, and I really don’t want to

The article discusses the author's growing fatigue with explicit sex scenes in modern television and film. The writer, who identifies as open-minded about sexual expression, argues that such scenes have become repetitive and lose their impact when overused. They criticize shows like 'Gypsy' and 'Euphoria' for featuring overly detailed and prolonged depictions of intimacy, which they feel detract from storytelling. The author nostalgically recalls older films like 'Casablanca' and 'Gone with the Wind,' where sexual tension was implied rather than explicitly shown. They argue that the current trend diminishes the artistic value of cinema by relying on overt displays of sexuality instead of creative subtlety.

In recent years, the portrayal of sexual content in television and film has sparked widespread debate among viewers and critics alike. Wendy Squires, a longtime observer of cinematic storytelling, expressed her growing frustration with the increasing prevalence of explicit sex scenes in modern media. Speaking last week, she noted that she has witnessed the "orgasm faces" of nearly every working actor, a phrase she used to highlight her discomfort with the frequency and intensity of such portrayals. Squires emphasized that while she supports the concept of uninhibited sex, she finds it unnecessary and unappealing when depicted in detail on screen. Squires' comments come amid a broader discussion about the role of sex in entertainment. She pointed to several recent shows, including Gypsy, which features actress Naomi Watts engaging in multiple sexual encounters with her on-screen and real-life husband, Billy Crudup. While acknowledging the quality of the acting and the narrative strength of the series, Squires found the prolonged and explicit nature of the sex scenes tedious. Her critique extends to other popular series such as Euphoria, where Sydney Sweeney's character engages in highly stylized and graphic sexual acts that Squires argues detract from the overall storytelling. The issue of excessive sexual content in media is not new, but Squires feels it has reached a tipping point. She recalled classic films like Casablanca and Gone with the Wind, where the passion and desire between characters were conveyed through subtle cues rather than explicit depictions. These older works relied on the audience's imagination to fill in the gaps, creating a sense of mystery and allure that contemporary productions often lack. Squires lamented the loss of this artistic restraint, suggesting that filmmakers have become overly reliant on explicit content to convey intimacy. Her concerns extend beyond mere aesthetics. Squires argued that the saturation of sexual imagery in media risks desensitizing audiences to the very thing it aims to depict, intimacy and connection. She drew a parallel between the normalization of violence in cinema and the current state of sexual content, noting that both have become so common that their impact is diminished. This desensitization, she believes, undermines the emotional weight of these moments, reducing them to mere spectacle rather than meaningful expression. Critics and creators within the industry have responded to Squires' remarks with mixed reactions. Some acknowledge her points, recognizing that the overuse of explicit content can indeed detract from the narrative depth of a production. Others defend the inclusion of such scenes, arguing that they serve to reflect the realities of human relationships and provide necessary context for character development. The debate continues to evolve, with no clear consensus on whether the portrayal of sex in media should be curtailed or embraced. As discussions around the depiction of sexuality in entertainment persist, the industry faces pressure to balance artistic expression with viewer expectations. Whether filmmakers choose to embrace or temper the explicitness of their content, the conversation surrounding the role of sex in storytelling is far from settled. For now, the focus remains on finding a middle ground that respects both the integrity of the narrative and the sensibilities of the audience.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 707 hr. ago
I have seen the ‘sex faces’ of nearly every working actor, and I really don’t want to

The article discusses the author's growing fatigue with explicit sex scenes in modern television and film. The writer, who identifies as open-minded about sexual expression, argues that such scenes have become repetitive and lose their impact when overused. They criticize shows like 'Gypsy' and 'Euphoria' for featuring overly detailed and prolonged depictions of intimacy, which they feel detract from storytelling. The author nostalgically recalls older films like 'Casablanca' and 'Gone with the Wind,' where sexual tension was implied rather than explicitly shown. They argue that the current trend diminishes the artistic value of cinema by relying on overt displays of sexuality instead of creative subtlety.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on cultural critique regarding the portrayal of sex in media, not on politics, policy, or public figures. There is no evident ideological slant in the framing of the argument, which is presented as a personal opinion on artistic expression and storytelling techniques.

Why factuality (85): The article discusses the author's personal opinion on the overuse of explicit sex scenes in television shows like 'Gypsy' and 'Euphoria'. While it does not provide specific factual claims about the content of the shows themselves, it reflects a common critique found in cross-source consensus regard

Why objectivity (70): The tone of the article is clearly subjective and opinionated, expressing frustration with the frequency and length of sex scenes in TV shows. The author uses emotionally charged language and frames the issue from a personal perspective, indicating a lack of neutrality.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories