The article reports on a survey conducted by Oštro during national and local elections, asking the public about their interest in content types and the effectiveness of the project 'Oštrogled'. The survey involved 45 participants who tracked Oštro’s content during the election campaign, with 49% regularly following and 31% occasionally. Most respondents (60%) were most interested in video fact-checking during live debates, followed by traditional articles (25%). When asked what types of content they would like to see more of during local elections, 51% preferred video fact-checking, while 49% chose background explanations and live fact-checking. Over 78% rated the content as useful for understanding the election campaign, with 55% giving the highest rating. Respondents expressed interest in verifying fulfillment of campaign promises and previous mandate obligations, with 69% selecting this as the most interesting theme. They also suggested new content formats such as podcasts and evaluations of positive/negative impacts of mayoral projects. Social media platforms Instagram and Facebook were the most commonly used for tracking Oštro’s work.
Bias read (Center): The article presents balanced findings based on survey data without overtly favoring any political stance. It reports on public preferences regarding election-related content without taking sides on specific political issues or parties. The framing remains neutral, focusing on audience interests and




