In Gospić, protest against illegal waste disposal: "If we save Lika, we save Croatia"In Gospić, Croatia, over 100 people protested against the illegal dumping of hazardous waste in Lika, carrying signs such as 'They sold Lika and folded it into darkness' and 'They poisoned water, soil, and air'. The protest took place ahead of a parliamentary committee meeting on environmental protection and nature conservation, which was postponed due to fires in Omis and Pelješac. The Croatian Agency for Prevention of Corruption and Organized Crime (USKOK) reported that approximately 37,000 tons of mixed waste have contaminated land and groundwater in the area. Local activists, including organizer Mile Ilić, claimed that all institutions have failed to address the issue, warning that if Croatian institutions performed their duties, the situation would not exist. Analysis by Zagreb’s geotechnical faculty confirmed the contamination risks, with some concerns extending to drinking water quality up to the Sinj region and islands like Pag and Rab. Although the case remains under criminal investigation involving at least 17 individuals, the scandal has gained political dimensions, with opposition calling for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Andrej Plenković.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the illegal waste dumping as a systemic failure of Croatian institutions, emphasizing the role of political leaders and suggesting corruption or negligence. It highlights the involvement of multiple countries (Slovenia, Italy, Germany) and criticizes the government's inability to
Why factuality (98): The article provides specific details such as the date of the protest (16 August 2026), the location (Gospić, Croatia), the number of participants (over 100 people), and the content of the protesters' signs. It also references the USKOK report from 6 August stating approximately 37,000 tons of mixed
Why objectivity (95): The article presents the information in a largely neutral manner, reporting on the protest, the USKOK findings, and statements from organizers like Mile Ilić. The tone remains objective, avoiding overtly emotional or biased language, though it does include quotes from protest organizers.
24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 97Objective 947 days agoA protest took place in Gospić, Croatia, against illegal waste dumping that has contaminated land, groundwater, and air. The protest was held ahead of a parliamentary committee meeting on environmental protection, which had been postponed due to wildfires in the areas of Omiš and Pelješec. The Croatian Agency for Prevention of Corruption and Organized Crime (Uskok) reported in August that approximately 37,000 tons of mixed waste in the area of Lik were polluting soil and groundwater. Local activists, including organizer Mile Ilć, criticized the failure of institutions to address the issue, stating that if they had done their jobs, the situation would not exist. Waste from Slovenia, Italy, and Germany has been discovered in multiple locations across Croatia, though it has not yet been removed. Analysis by Zagreb’s Geotechnical Faculty confirmed the pollution and health risks. The issue has broader implications, with concerns over potential contamination of drinking water up to the Sibenik region and islands like Pag and Rab. While the Croatian Public Health Institute stated that water quality remains acceptable, the case remains under criminal investigation involving at least 17涉案人员
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure of institutions and highlights criticism of the government and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković. It emphasizes the role of political opposition calling for no-confidence votes, suggesting a left-leaning perspective on institutional accountability and
Why factuality (97): This article accurately reports the protest in Gospić, the delay in the parliamentary committee meeting due to fires in Omiš and Pelješac, and the USKOK report on 37,000 tons of waste. It also mentions the involvement of political figures and the potential wider environmental impact. All these point
Why objectivity (94): The article maintains an objective tone by presenting both the concerns raised by the protest organizers and the official response from the Croatian Public Health Institute regarding water safety. However, it slightly leans toward emphasizing the severity of the issue through the inclusion of quotes
Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 96Objective 937 days agoA protest took place in Gospić, Croatia, over the illegal dumping of hazardous waste in the area of Lika, with hundreds of people participating. Protesters held signs criticizing the contamination of water, soil, and air, and emphasized the need to save Lika to save Croatia. The demonstration occurred before a parliamentary committee meeting on environmental protection, which was postponed due to fires in nearby areas. According to a report by Croatia’s anti-corruption agency Uskok, approximately 37,000 tons of mixed waste have been illegally dumped in Lika, polluting the ground and groundwater. Local activists have raised concerns about potential health risks and environmental damage, noting that the waste comes from Slovenia, Italy, and Germany. While the Croatian Institute of Public Health claims drinking water remains safe, the issue has sparked political debate, with opposition calling for a vote of no confidence against Prime Minister Andrej Plenković.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the protest, citing reports from anti-corruption agencies and environmental organizations, while including quotes from both protesters and officials. It does not favor any particular political side but highlights the growing political implications of the sit
Why factuality (96): The article accurately describes the protest in Gospić, the USKOK report on 37,000 tons of waste, and the involvement of political figures. It also includes the geographical origin of the waste (Slovenia, Italy, Germany) and the potential broader environmental consequences. While slightly less detai
Why objectivity (93): The article is generally neutral but shows a slight tilt towards highlighting the environmental risks and the failure of institutions, based on the quotes included. This gives it a marginally more activist-oriented tone compared to the others, though it remains mostly balanced.
Tens of thousands of tonnes of hazardous waste: drinking water at risk in Pag and Raba?An analysis by Zagreb's Faculty of Geotechnical Engineering has revealed that approximately 37,000 tons of illegally dumped waste in Gospić, Croatia, are contaminating soil and groundwater, posing risks to both the environment and human health. While the Croatian Institute for Public Health claims drinking water in Gospić is safe, a local initiative called 'Gospić je naš dom' argues that this assurance does not apply to downstream areas such as Otočac, Senj, Pag, and Rab. The initiative highlights concerns over harmful substances like PFAS chemicals, which could spread through karst aquifers, threatening broader water systems. These findings have sparked calls for immediate cleanup and accountability, with some demanding Prime Minister Andrej Plenković's resignation. Plenković dismissed these concerns as panic fueled by misinformation, while analysts suggest his response might be pushing opposition parties toward unity.
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives, scientific findings, official assurances, and activist concerns, without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from various stakeholders, including the government, activists, and analysts, providing a balanced view of the situation.
Why factuality (85): The article reports on environmental concerns related to illegal waste dumping in Croatia, citing a study from Zagreb’s geotechnical faculty indicating around 37,000 tons of hazardous waste affecting groundwater and soil in Gospić. It references public health assurances from the Croatian Health Insp
Why objectivity (65): The tone leans towards highlighting public concern and skepticism toward official assurances, suggesting potential bias. While it presents both sides (official assessments vs. citizen groups), the emphasis on the citizens’ doubts may reflect a more critical stance than purely objective reporting.
DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 6512 days agoThe article reports on a major environmental scandal in Croatia involving illegal dumping of hazardous waste across multiple regions, linked to a criminal network. The waste, including medical and other dangerous materials, has been illegally disposed of by countries such as Italy, Germany, and Slovenia. Environmental analyses reveal over 37,000 tons of waste were dumped in the area of Gospić in Lika, with harmful substances already contaminating soil and groundwater. Experts warn that without remediation efforts, the area remains a pollution source affecting both the environment and human health. While the Croatian Prime Minister, Andrej Plenković, asserts that drinking water in the region is safe based on current tests, he criticizes public and opposition reactions as exaggerated and politically motivated. Independent MP Marija Selak Raspudić calls for a vote of no confidence in Plenković and suggests urgent legislative changes to define ecological destruction as the most severe crime against the environment.
Bias read (Center): While the article presents a serious environmental issue with potential political implications, it does not exhibit clear ideological leaning. It includes balanced reporting on both the scientific findings and the political responses, with no evident favoring of one side over another. The framing is
Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details such as the amount of waste (over ten thousand tons) and locations (Gospić in Lika), which align with the general consensus found in other reports. It also mentions the involvement of a criminal network and the presence of hazardous medical waste, which are comm
Why objectivity (65): The article presents information from experts and officials but includes quotes from Premier Plenković that suggest a dismissive attitude toward public concerns. This framing can be seen as biased in favor of the government’s position. The mention of opposition spreading misinformation introduces a
DeloIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 80Objective 6012 days ago Croatia's underground mine hit by toxic waste, also from SloveniaAn environmental crisis in Croatia involving illegal dumping of hazardous waste, including some from Slovenia, has sparked concern over contamination of groundwater and soil. Investigations reveal approximately 37,000 tons of waste, including medical and other dangerous materials, have been illegally disposed of in the area of Gospić in Lika, with harmful substances already leaching into the ground and underground water. Experts warn that without remediation efforts, the pollution could spread further, affecting both the environment and human health. Premier Andrej Plenković has dismissed concerns as exaggerated, claiming tap water remains safe and accusing the opposition of spreading misinformation to gain political advantage. Meanwhile, independent MP Marija Selak Raspudić has called for a vote of no confidence in Plenković and proposed emergency sessions and legal reforms to classify ecological destruction as the most serious crime against the environment.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue through the lens of political accountability, emphasizing Premier Plenković’s dismissal of public concerns and his accusation that the opposition is using fear-mongering for political gain. The narrative downplays the severity of the environmental threat by asserting the
Why factuality (80): This article confirms the presence of illegal waste dumping involving thousands of tons from Slovenia, Italy, and Germany, referencing analyses showing contamination of soil and groundwater in Gospić. It mentions political statements by Premier Plenković defending water safety, which aligns with bro
Why objectivity (60): The article includes political commentary from Premier Plenković, which introduces a partisan perspective. While it presents opposing viewpoints (citizen concerns vs. government reassurance), the inclusion of political rhetoric reduces overall objectivity.
Slovenia
