ON
← Back to feed
Madhya Pradesh HC takes cognisance of death threats to Muslim judge after lynching verdict
India🏛️ Politics9 hr. ago

Madhya Pradesh HC takes cognisance of death threats to Muslim judge after lynching verdict

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has taken suo motu notice of death threats and communal abuse directed at Muslim judge Tabassum Khan following her conviction of seven men in a 2022 lynching case. The victims were truck drivers who were attacked by a mob claiming they were cattle smugglers. After the verdict, videos showing death threats and burning of effigies of the judge circulated online. The court emphasized that such actions undermine judicial independence and ordered continued police protection for Khan. It also mandated that state authorities submit affidavits detailing measures taken to secure her safety and address the threats. The police have registered a case against unidentified individuals under anti-terrorism laws. The incident highlights concerns over threats against judges and the impact on judicial independence.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentCenter9 hr. ago
M.P. High Court orders protection for judge facing threats after verdict in lynching case

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ordered state police to protect Additional District and Sessions Judge Tabassum Khan, who faces threats after convicting cow vigilantes in a lynching case. The court took suo motu action based on media reports, calling the threats a serious issue that undermines judicial independence. Judge Khan sentenced several individuals to life imprisonment for beating a truck driver to death in 2022 on suspicion of cow smuggling. The High Court issued notices to senior police and government officials, demanding they take action against those threatening the judge. The Narmadapuram police have already filed an FIR in the case.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, focusing on the legal process and the court's response to threats against a judge. It does not overtly favor any political ideology or party, nor does it emphasize specific political agendas. The framing remains neutral, highlighting the judiciary's职能和

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndependentCenter17 hr. ago
Madhya Pradesh HC takes cognisance of death threats to Muslim judge after lynching verdict

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has taken suo motu notice of death threats and communal abuse directed at Muslim judge Tabassum Khan following her conviction of seven men in a 2022 lynching case. The victims were truck drivers who were attacked by a mob claiming they were cattle smugglers. After the verdict, videos showing death threats and burning of effigies of the judge circulated online. The court emphasized that such actions undermine judicial independence and ordered continued police protection for Khan. It also mandated that state authorities submit affidavits detailing measures taken to secure her safety and address the threats. The police have registered a case against unidentified individuals under anti-terrorism laws. The incident highlights concerns over threats against judges and the impact on judicial independence.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the legal proceedings, the threats faced by the judge, and the responses from both the judiciary and law enforcement. While the issue of communal tensions and threats against judges is clearly framed as a serious concern, there is no overt ideological slant

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndependentRightyesterday
Madhya Pradesh: Muslim judge receives death threats after convicting seven men in lynching case

A Muslim judge in Madhya Pradesh, Tabassum Khan, has received death threats and faced communal abuse after sentencing seven men to life imprisonment for the 2022 lynching of truck driver Sheikh Lala Nazir Ahmed. The incident occurred when the mob, claiming the victims were cattle smugglers, attacked them in Barakhar village. Following the verdict, social media posts containing death threats and communal slurs emerged, with some videos showing effigies of the judge being burned. The police registered a complaint against unidentified individuals under anti-hate speech laws. Security for the judge has been heightened, and authorities are investigating the perpetrators. Opposition leaders and legal associations have condemned the threats, emphasizing the importance of judicial independence and the rule of law.

Bias read (Right): The article frames the incident as an attack on judicial independence, which aligns with right-wing narratives that emphasize national identity and traditional values. While the focus is on the threat to the judge, the emphasis on 'communal abuse' and the condemnation of the 'silence of the higher司法

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories