Croatia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives9/1/2026
HDZ: Two of the most dangerous eco-bombs are in Zagreb today and are completely out of control!
The Zagreb branch of the HDZ (Croatian Democratic Union) has continued to criticize local authorities over hazardous waste pits at Savica Lake. Following their previous warnings about approximately 33,000 tons of industrial waste near the Petruševec water intake, they released a timeline of the issue from 2006 to present. The head of the city branch, Ivan Matijević, who also serves as the state secretary in the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, claims that the area has not been properly remediated and that there is no data on ongoing monitoring of contamination. According to the HDZ’s timeline, unstable hazardous waste at Savica Lake was confirmed as early as 2006, while the city announced preparation for remediation a year later. In 2016, a program outlined potential impacts on groundwater at Petruševec and established a network of 12 control boreholes. The HDZ cites findings from 2018 and 2023, noting elevated concentrations of manganese, iron, nickel, and PAHs in groundwater. They specifically highlight the period after the arrival of Tomislav Tomašević and Možemo! in power in 2021, criticizing the lack of a detailed technical remediation plan and continuous soil
The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has issued a sharp warning regarding environmental hazards in Zagreb, claiming that two of the most dangerous ecological bombs, amounting to approximately 33,000 tons of hazardous industrial waste, are currently located near Lake Savica and completely outside the control of municipal authorities. The claim was made in a statement released by the Zagreb branch of the HDZ, which accused the city government of negligence and failure to act despite long-standing knowledge of the issue. According to the HDZ's detailed chronology, the presence of unstable hazardous waste in the area of Lake Savica was confirmed as early as 2006. In 2007, the city announced plans for remediation. By 2016, a program of measures had been established, including the investigation of potential impacts on groundwater at the Petruševec water treatment plant. At that time, a network of 12 monitoring boreholes was set up. The HDZ cited findings from 2018 and 2023, indicating that contamination had reached depths of up to 5.7 meters, with elevated levels of manganese, iron, nickel, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) detected in nearly all monitoring wells. The HDZ specifically highlighted the period following the election of Tomislav Tomašević and his party, Možemo!, to power in 2021. They claimed that the 2022 Environmental Protection Plan for Lake Savica did not include a specific technical sanitation program or detailed groundwater monitoring. The party also pointed to the 2023 program of hydrogeological works and continuous monitoring, which identified both the gullies along Lake Savica and the Jakuševec landfill as sources of groundwater contamination at the Petruševec water treatment plant. The report recommended continued monitoring of groundwater quality and surface waters, as well as comprehensive site remediation. Despite these recommendations, the HDZ claims that monitoring efforts have ceased since 2023, and results from previous assessments have not been shared with the public. The party also criticized the 2026 Waste Management Plan for Zagreb, which they argue reaffirms the risk posed by the contamination and recommends full-area remediation. However, they assert that there is still no evidence of a remediation plan being prepared or implemented. In its final statement, the HDZ labeled the gullies along Lake Savica and the Jakuševec landfill as the two most dangerous ecological bombs in Croatia, stating that they are currently beyond the oversight of municipal services. Ivan Matijević, president of the Zagreb HDZ branch and also serving as the state secretary in the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, concluded that no measurements of groundwater or soil contamination near the Petruševec water treatment plant are being conducted. He emphasized that this facility supplies water to around 150,000 residents of Zagreb. Political tensions have escalated as the HDZ accuses Tomašević and his coalition of ignoring scientific data and failing to take action. The party argues that the issue has been known for years, yet no meaningful steps have been taken to address it. This criticism comes amid broader political discourse over environmental issues, with other parties such as Drito and SDP facing similar accusations of hypocrisy. While the HDZ frames the situation as a national crisis, others suggest that the debate reflects deeper ideological divides within Croatian politics. The HDZ’s allegations highlight a growing concern over environmental governance in urban areas, particularly in relation to legacy pollution and the challenges of implementing effective remediation strategies. As the controversy continues, the city government has yet to respond publicly, leaving the situation unresolved and raising questions about accountability and transparency in local environmental management. The ongoing dispute underscores the complexities of balancing political agendas with public health and ecological safety.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Residents of Senj have raised concerns about a new waste dump located near a newly built parking lot of a retail chain, fearing that rainwater could wash the contamination into the surrounding environment. The issue became visible after the first rains, as water flowing down from nearby hills passes through accumulated waste, potentially spreading pollution downstream. A citizen expressed alarm, stating that water is first contaminated by waste and then flows further, endangering water resources. The community is questioning whether local authorities and investors will address this issue or continue contributing to environmental degradation, similar to previous incidents reported by Morski.hr.
Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights environmental concerns raised by citizens against corporate and governmental negligence, using critical language toward the lack of action by authorities and investors. It emphasizes the negative impact on natural resources and frames the issue as a failure of governance and a
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the discovery of illegal waste dumping near a new parking lot in Senj, referencing the video from Morski.hr. It mentions the concern over contaminated runoff and quotes residents' fears, aligning with the primary source document. However, it does not mention the inv
Why objectivity (75): The tone is concerned but remains neutral, focusing on reporting the issue rather than taking sides. However, there is some emotional language used when describing the impact on the environment, such as 'voda se najprije onečišćuje smećem, a onda teče dalje', which could be seen as slightly emotive.
The Zagreb branch of the HDZ (Croatian Democratic Union) has continued to criticize local authorities over hazardous waste pits at Savica Lake. Following their previous warnings about approximately 33,000 tons of industrial waste near the Petruševec water intake, they released a timeline of the issue from 2006 to present. The head of the city branch, Ivan Matijević, who also serves as the state secretary in the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, claims that the area has not been properly remediated and that there is no data on ongoing monitoring of contamination. According to the HDZ’s timeline, unstable hazardous waste at Savica Lake was confirmed as early as 2006, while the city announced preparation for remediation a year later. In 2016, a program outlined potential impacts on groundwater at Petruševec and established a network of 12 control boreholes. The HDZ cites findings from 2018 and 2023, noting elevated concentrations of manganese, iron, nickel, and PAHs in groundwater. They specifically highlight the period after the arrival of Tomislav Tomašević and Možemo! in power in 2021, criticizing the lack of a detailed technical remediation plan and continuous soil
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of local governance as a failure to address environmental hazards, aligning with left-leaning concerns about regulatory oversight and corporate accountability. The emphasis on the lack of monitoring and remediation efforts, coupled with the accusation that the city's
Why factuality (50): The article references an environmental scandal involving illegal waste disposal near the Savica area but does not directly address the specific incident described in the primary source document from Morski.hr, which focuses on Senj and the Petrol land. The article discusses a different location (Sa
Why objectivity (40): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'two most dangerous eco-bombs' and frames the situation as a political issue by citing HDZ statements. It presents the HDZ’s perspective without balancing it with opposing viewpoints or providing neutral analysis, showing clear bias.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
