ON
← Back to feed
New Statesman logo🏛️ Politics
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsProgressive4 days ago

Have you noticed that time is speeding up?

The article titled 'Have you noticed that time is speeding up?' by the New Statesman explores the perception that time seems to be passing more quickly in modern life. It discusses psychological theories and cultural observations that suggest this phenomenon may be linked to increased stress, technological saturation, and changes in daily routines. The piece raises questions about how our relationship with time has evolved over the past few decades and whether this shift reflects broader societal trends. While the article presents various perspectives, it does not offer definitive conclusions, leaving room for further discussion.

1 reports

New Statesman logoNew StatesmanIndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 604 days ago
Have you noticed that time is speeding up?

The article titled 'Have you noticed that time is speeding up?' by the New Statesman explores the perception that time seems to be passing more quickly in modern life. It discusses psychological theories and cultural observations that suggest this phenomenon may be linked to increased stress, technological saturation, and changes in daily routines. The piece raises questions about how our relationship with time has evolved over the past few decades and whether this shift reflects broader societal trends. While the article presents various perspectives, it does not offer definitive conclusions, leaving room for further discussion.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the acceleration of perceived time as a contemporary issue influenced by modern pressures and technological advancements. While it does not explicitly reference political policies or figures, the tone suggests a critical view of current societal structures, aligning with left-wing

Why factuality (50): The title 'Have you noticed that time is speeding up?' suggests a subjective observation rather than a specific event. Without a clear subject or event being reported, there is no concrete factual content to evaluate. The article likely discusses a general perception of time rather than reporting on

Why objectivity (60): The title uses rhetorical questioning and implies a personal perspective, which may suggest a lack of strict neutrality. However, without more content from the article, it's challenging to determine if the full piece maintains balance or leans toward a particular viewpoint.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories