A One Nation MP, David Farley, stated that the party's net overseas migration (Nom) target of 130,000 is 'not too different' from Labor's, prompting leader Pauline Hanson to clarify the party's position. Farley argued that the 130,000 figure does not include skilled workers, backpackers, and laborers under the Pacific Australia Labour Mobility (Palm) scheme, suggesting a need for an additional 100,000 migrants to support critical industries like agriculture and aged care. However, Hanson emphasized that One Nation aims to reduce net overseas migration to 130,000, clarifying that seasonal workers not meeting the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) residency criteria are not counted in the Nom. This has created confusion around the party's immigration policy, with critics noting inconsistencies in how the target is defined.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, Farley's interpretation of the migration target and Hanson's clarification, without overtly favoring either side. It highlights the confusion within the party and quotes criticism from opposition figures, maintaining a balanced tone.


