ON
← Back to feed
Hanson forced to intervene after One Nation MP says party’s migration target ‘not too different’ from Labor’s
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter6 days ago

Hanson forced to intervene after One Nation MP says party’s migration target ‘not too different’ from Labor’s

A One Nation MP, David Farley, stated that the party's net overseas migration (Nom) target of 130,000 is 'not too different' from Labor's, prompting leader Pauline Hanson to clarify the party's position. Farley argued that the 130,000 figure does not include skilled workers, backpackers, and laborers under the Pacific Australia Labour Mobility (Palm) scheme, suggesting a need for an additional 100,000 migrants to support critical industries like agriculture and aged care. However, Hanson emphasized that One Nation aims to reduce net overseas migration to 130,000, clarifying that seasonal workers not meeting the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) residency criteria are not counted in the Nom. This has created confusion around the party's immigration policy, with critics noting inconsistencies in how the target is defined.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

The Guardian (World) logoThe Guardian (World)IndependentCenter6 days ago
Hanson forced to intervene after One Nation MP says party’s migration target ‘not too different’ from Labor’s

A One Nation MP, David Farley, stated that the party's net overseas migration (Nom) target of 130,000 is 'not too different' from Labor's, prompting leader Pauline Hanson to clarify the party's position. Farley argued that the 130,000 figure does not include skilled workers, backpackers, and laborers under the Pacific Australia Labour Mobility (Palm) scheme, suggesting a need for an additional 100,000 migrants to support critical industries like agriculture and aged care. However, Hanson emphasized that One Nation aims to reduce net overseas migration to 130,000, clarifying that seasonal workers not meeting the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) residency criteria are not counted in the Nom. This has created confusion around the party's immigration policy, with critics noting inconsistencies in how the target is defined.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, Farley's interpretation of the migration target and Hanson's clarification, without overtly favoring either side. It highlights the confusion within the party and quotes criticism from opposition figures, maintaining a balanced tone.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories