ON
← Back to feed
Grisham files restraining order against Max Miller
United States🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive19 days ago

Grisham files restraining order against Max Miller

Stephanie Grisham, former White House communications director under President Trump, has filed a restraining order against Republican Congressman Max Miller of Ohio, alleging abuse by Miller toward his ex-wife. This follows a 2021 op-ed by Grisham describing an abusive relationship with an unnamed individual, which led to a defamation lawsuit by Miller that was later settled with a nondisclosure agreement. Miller recently claimed that Grisham's allegations were made around the same time as her book launch, suggesting possible bias. Meanwhile, Miller's ex-wife, Emily Moreno, has accused him of physical abuse, including throwing hot water, pointing a gun at her, and injuring their child. These claims have sparked calls for Miller's resignation from some Republicans, though he denies the allegations and plans to seek an ethics investigation to clear his name.

Sen. Bernie Moreno of Ohio has publicly stated that his former son-in-law, Rep. Max Miller, should not serve in Congress due to ongoing allegations of abuse against his ex-wife and their child. In a post on X, Moreno called Miller a "danger to my daughter" and urged him to seek professional help, arguing that his behavior poses a threat to others. These remarks come as Miller continues to deny all accusations, vowing to remain in the race for another term despite mounting pressure from within his party. The controversy surrounding Miller escalated recently when his ex-wife, Emily Moreno, requested a restraining order against him, alleging that he has repeatedly harassed her attorney. The request follows months of legal filings and public reports detailing multiple incidents of alleged abuse. According to court documents and police reports, Miller is accused of throwing his ex-wife against a wall during a custody exchange in February 2026, which resulted in visible injuries. The child, who was present, reportedly suffered a fractured clavicle and a handprint-shaped bruise. Additional allegations include instances where Miller allegedly pointed a gun at his ex-wife and poured hot water on her in 2024. In response to these claims, Miller has consistently denied wrongdoing, asserting that the allegations are fabricated and aimed at undermining his custody rights. During a livestream on X, he criticized the timing of the accusations, suggesting they were made to influence the ongoing custody dispute. He also presented documents he claims exonerate him, stating that if the allegations were true, he would already be in jail. Miller further accused his ex-wife of defaming him and abusing their child, describing her actions as a pattern of false reporting. Emily Moreno’s legal representative, Stefan Mychajliw, condemned Miller’s livestream as "shameful" and "lie-filled," emphasizing that there is substantial evidence of his violent behavior. He stressed that Miller’s denials lack credibility, particularly since the court has already ruled against him in some matters. Mychajliw expressed confidence that justice will ultimately prevail in court, though he acknowledged the emotional toll on the family. Meanwhile, Sen. Bernie Moreno has described the past two years as "pure hell" for his family, highlighting how Miller’s conduct has made privacy impossible. He has called for Miller to receive psychological assistance and to refrain from continuing to endanger others until he does. His comments align with growing concerns among some Republican lawmakers, including Sens. Rick Scott and Roger Marshall, who have suggested that Miller should resign from Congress. However, others, such as President Donald Trump, have urged the families to resolve the matter privately, stating that the situation involves "accusations" rather than proven facts. As the political fallout intensifies, Miller has decided to take action by requesting an ethics investigation into himself. In a post on X, he framed the move as an effort to clear his name from "horrific attacks" and emphasized that his facts remain unchanged. He invited colleagues to review the materials independently, hoping to counter the narrative that has developed around his personal life. With the deadline for dropping out of the race approaching, some Republicans are considering whether to challenge Miller on the ballot, potentially altering the outcome of a congressional race in a district that traditionally leans Republican. The situation remains fluid, with legal proceedings and public scrutiny continuing to shape the trajectory of this high-profile political conflict.

Go to the primary sources (6)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

CBS News (US) logoCBS News (US)IndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8021 days ago
Sen. Moreno says ex-son-in-law Max Miller shouldn't serve in Congress

GOP Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio has publicly criticized his former son-in-law, Rep. Max Miller, stating that Miller should not serve in Congress due to allegations of abuse against his ex-wife and child. Miller, who is running for re-election, has denied all accusations of misconduct, claiming they are false and part of a strategy to influence the custody battle. His ex-wife, Emily Moreno, filed a restraining order against Miller, alleging physical and verbal altercations with her attorney during a custody dispute. Miller responded via livestream, disputing the allegations and releasing documents he claims exonerate him. A spokesperson for Emily Moreno condemned Miller's response as 'shameful' and 'lie-filled', emphasizing the existence of documented evidence of his alleged violent behavior.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation through the lens of a family scandal involving a sitting congressman and a high-profile politician. While both parties present their perspectives, the narrative emphasizes the credibility of Emily Moreno's allegations and criticizes Miller's attempts to discredit her

Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes the allegations against Miller, including the custody battle, the restraining order request, and the physical and verbal altercations with Emily Moreno's attorney. It references court filings and police reports, aligning closely with the primary source document. The

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the situation fairly neutrally, quoting both Moreno and Miller. However, it leans slightly towards emphasizing the seriousness of the allegations and the need for Miller to resign, which introduces a subtle bias. The tone remains mostly objective but shows some inclination to hi

The Hill logoThe HillIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8519 days ago
Grisham files restraining order against Max Miller

Stephanie Grisham, former White House communications director under President Trump, has filed a restraining order against Republican Congressman Max Miller of Ohio, alleging abuse by Miller toward his ex-wife. This follows a 2021 op-ed by Grisham describing an abusive relationship with an unnamed individual, which led to a defamation lawsuit by Miller that was later settled with a nondisclosure agreement. Miller recently claimed that Grisham's allegations were made around the same time as her book launch, suggesting possible bias. Meanwhile, Miller's ex-wife, Emily Moreno, has accused him of physical abuse, including throwing hot water, pointing a gun at her, and injuring their child. These claims have sparked calls for Miller's resignation from some Republicans, though he denies the allegations and plans to seek an ethics investigation to clear his name.

Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives without overtly favoring one side. It reports on legal actions, personal allegations, and political reactions without clearly leaning towards either Grisham's or Miller's version of events. While the issue involves high-profile individuals and political inf

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the filing of a restraining order by Stephanie Grisham against Max Miller, citing her lawyer's statement and referencing the prior defamation lawsuit. It mentions the custody battle and allegations against Miller, aligning with the primary source document. However, it

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting facts from both sides without overt bias. It quotes Miller's denial of the allegations and mentions the restraining order request, avoiding strong editorializing. However, the title focuses on Grisham's action rather than providing balanced

CBS News (US) logoCBS News (US)IndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 7523 days ago
Lawyer for Rep. Miller's ex-wife files for restraining order amid abuse claims

The ex-wife of Republican Congressman Max Miller has filed for a restraining order against him, alleging that he has harassed and physically assaulted her and her attorneys. The allegations come as part of ongoing custody disputes and have become a significant issue in Miller's reelection campaign. Miller denies the accusations, claiming that he maintains joint custody of their daughter and accuses his ex-wife of defamation and child abuse. Court documents and police reports describe incidents including an alleged assault during a custody exchange and injuries to both the ex-wife and their child. These legal actions add to the controversy surrounding Miller's personal life and political career.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a series of credible allegations against Miller, emphasizing the legal actions taken by his ex-wife and referencing court documents and police reports. While it presents Miller's denials, the focus on the specific incidents and the potential impact on his campaign

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the restraining order request by Emily Moreno and the allegations against Miller, including the physical and verbal altercations with her attorney. It provides context about the custody battle and the ongoing legal issues. However, it lacks specific details about the c

Why objectivity (75): The article is somewhat biased in its focus on the restraining order and the allegations against Miller. While it presents the facts, it emphasizes the severity of the claims and the impact on Miller's campaign, which can be seen as a slight lean towards the narrative that Miller is unfit for office

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories