ON
← Back to feed
Architect attacks critics of underground tanks: 'The country is urbanally devastated, and we are dealing with non-theme'
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative8 days ago

Architect attacks critics of underground tanks: 'The country is urbanally devastated, and we are dealing with non-theme'

The placement of underground waste containers near Ban Jelacic Square in central Zagreb has sparked significant public debate and criticism. Young architect Janko Kralj argues that the issue is trivial compared to larger urban challenges like coastal devastation and unchecked construction. The location, a highly frequented area known to both locals and tourists, has drawn backlash despite being common practice across Europe. Opposition came from the HDZ party, which likened the decision to the communist removal of a monument to Ban Jelacic in 1947. The City of Zagreb defended the choice, citing technical necessities such as existing infrastructure for utilities and the need to keep waste bins within 200 meters of residents. However, the Ministry of Culture raised concerns about historical preservation, noting that Zagreb had yet to adopt all relevant guidelines. Lawyer Nika Pinter filed a formal complaint, claiming the installation lacked proper documentation and procedures. Meanwhile, architects criticized the decision, recalling that the same square once housed the world’s oldest public restroom.

The city of Zagreb has become embroiled in controversy over the installation of underground waste containers at the intersection of Illica and Ban Jelačić Square. A legal complaint was filed against the city by renowned Croatian lawyer Nika Pinter, who claims that the project violated procedural rules and lacked necessary permits. According to Pinter, she submitted the complaint based on law because she believes the construction of the containers at the entrance to Ban Jelačić Square is inappropriate. She further stated that upon reviewing documentation, she found that the installation proceeded without all required documents and that procedures were not followed. Pinter noted that according to a ministry report, the Ministry did not include guidelines from the Conservation Office in the Urban Planning Regulation, which they were obligated to do. In response, the spokesperson for the City of Zagreb, Dinka Živalj, defended the decision, stating that the location on Ban Jelačić Square is the best possible site for the underground bins due to its proximity to residential areas and existing infrastructure. She emphasized that the location passed all criteria and evaluations, including those by conservators and municipal offices, and that there were agreements from the state. Živalj explained that a multidisciplinary team had examined all possible locations within the city center and concluded that none could serve the purpose due to existing installations. The chosen location, before number 2 on Illica, meets technical and safety conditions, does not threaten the stability of surrounding buildings or infrastructure, and complies with conservation guidelines. The city has already installed 275 underground bins on 66 locations within the city center, while 552 semi-underground bins have been placed on 184 sites outside the center. These bins are intended for residents, while visitors continue to use bins located at public restrooms. Živalj pointed out that similar installations exist in other European cities, such as Ljubljana’s Prešeren Square, and that these bins offer advantages over traditional trash cans, including greater capacity, cleaner public spaces, reduced odor dispersion, and fewer pests. She argued that the current system is more effective than using bags, which remain the only alternative. Despite these arguments, local political parties, particularly the Zagreb branch of the HDZ, have criticized the project, calling it a destructive intervention in one of the city's most historically significant squares. The party’s leader, Ivan Matijević, accused the city administration of prioritizing the interests of a limited group of residents over the broader public interest and the protection of historical heritage. He compared the project to the communist removal of monuments to Ban Jelačić in 1947, suggesting both acts represent a form of political devastation of cultural landmarks. Matijević also highlighted that the project was carried out during the summer holidays, implying that the city was not adequately addressing concerns raised by citizens and activists. Meanwhile, the opposition party Možemo! responded to the HDZ’s criticism, arguing that the HDZ lacks credibility in criticizing the city’s waste management policies. They claimed that during the five years the HDZ governed alongside Mayor Milan Bandić, little progress was made in improving infrastructure, and the city remained cluttered with garbage bins. Možemo! praised the current administration for implementing underground bins on 66 locations in the city center and noted that the location near Illica is the only viable option due to existing installations and distance requirements. They also emphasized that extensive preparatory work has been completed for the construction of a modern waste management center with sorting facilities and composting units, which would eventually allow the closure of the Jakuševec landfill. Public reaction has been mixed, with some supporting the initiative as a step toward better urban hygiene and others opposing it due to aesthetic concerns. An ongoing survey asks whether residents support the placement of underground bins near Ban Jelačić Square, highlighting the divide among Zagreb’s citizens. Meanwhile, the city continues to emphasize that the project adheres to all regulations and that the bins will help reduce visual clutter and improve cleanliness in the historic district. As the debate unfolds, the city faces pressure to address lingering concerns about the impact of the new infrastructure on the city’s cultural and historical landscape.

2 reports

tportal logotportalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 758 days ago
Architect attacks critics of underground tanks: 'The country is urbanally devastated, and we are dealing with non-theme'

The placement of underground waste containers near Ban Jelacic Square in central Zagreb has sparked significant public debate and criticism. Young architect Janko Kralj argues that the issue is trivial compared to larger urban challenges like coastal devastation and unchecked construction. The location, a highly frequented area known to both locals and tourists, has drawn backlash despite being common practice across Europe. Opposition came from the HDZ party, which likened the decision to the communist removal of a monument to Ban Jelacic in 1947. The City of Zagreb defended the choice, citing technical necessities such as existing infrastructure for utilities and the need to keep waste bins within 200 meters of residents. However, the Ministry of Culture raised concerns about historical preservation, noting that Zagreb had yet to adopt all relevant guidelines. Lawyer Nika Pinter filed a formal complaint, claiming the installation lacked proper documentation and procedures. Meanwhile, architects criticized the decision, recalling that the same square once housed the world’s oldest public restroom.

Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives, criticism from citizens, the HDZ party, and architects, alongside explanations from city officials and the Ministry of Culture. It does not favor any side but reports on the controversy objectively, using balanced language and including opposing viewpoints.

Why factuality (85): This article mirrors the content of the primary source, including the technical checks, proximity to residents, and alignment with conservation guidelines. It also mentions the legal challenges indirectly, maintaining consistency with the primary source.

Why objectivity (75): The tone is neutral, focusing on the technical aspects and rationale behind the decision. There is minimal editorializing, keeping the focus on factual information.

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 709 days ago
Video HDZ posted a LEGO cartoon about tanks in the Marketplace, mocking the We Can

The Croatian HDZ party posted an animated video created using artificial intelligence on Facebook, mocking the Zagreb city government over the installation of underground waste containers at the intersection of Ilica and Ban Jelačić Square. The video, styled as a music video, depicts members of the Možemo platform as LEGO figures and refers to them mockingly as 'Muzemo.' The clip criticizes the city administration for allegedly moving waste from the Jakuševec landfill to the city center rather than closing it, suggesting this undermines the city's cleanliness. HDZ also compares Zagreb unfavorably to cities like Ljubljana, Vienna, and Madrid, implying that those cities' central squares are cleaner and more proud. The placement of these underground bins has sparked political controversy, with HDZ accusing Mayor Tomislav Tomašević of leaving a 'historical mark' in Zagreb's center. Možemo responded by pointing out that HDZ failed to resolve the waste issue during years of cooperation with former mayor Milan Bandić. The city claims the new system improves cleanliness and reduces unpleasant smells.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents a critique of the ruling Možemo coalition by the opposition HDZ party, using mocking imagery and rhetoric. The framing emphasizes HDZ's criticism of the city government's actions, portraying their policies negatively while highlighting the opposition's stance. The tone and useof

Why factuality (85): This article summarizes the ongoing debate around the waste containers, including the HDZ's criticism and the city's defense. It maintains consistency with the primary source and includes multiple perspectives, though it still has a slight political tilt.

Why objectivity (70): While the article attempts to present both sides, the tone occasionally leans toward the political critique, particularly in describing the HDZ's actions. This affects the overall objectivity.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories