We have warned the President of the violation of the constitutional order in the functioning of the Parliament.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenter3 hr. ago

The article discusses political developments in Slovenia involving President Nataša Pirc Musar and Prime Minister Robert Golob. Golob criticized the failure of the coalition majority to approve the daily agenda in parliament, which included establishing opposition investigative committees regarding Black Cube and party financing. He emphasized the need for the president’s office and constitutional authorities to uphold the constitutional order. Golob also mentioned ongoing constructive dialogue with Pirc Musar and potential cooperation on issues like energy, demographics, and regionalization. The article highlights efforts by various parties to find common ground beyond political divisions, including discussions on demographic balance and national development strategies. It notes that while Resnică is formally in opposition, it has historically voted with coalition partners, providing necessary parliamentary support.

Bias read (Center): While the article covers politically sensitive topics such as constitutional order and parliamentary procedures, it presents multiple perspectives from different political figures (Golob, Pirc Musar, Han, Vrečko). There is no clear ideological slant in the framing, and the emphasis appears balanced,

VečerIndependent🔒Progressive4 hr. ago

On July 15, 2026, Robert Golob, a member of the National Council, expressed his disappointment that the president of the National Council was not the sole interpreter of constitutional order in Slovenia. He emphasized the need for all guardians of constitutional order, including the Constitutional Court and the office of the President, to speak out and defend the valid constitutional order. Golob also criticized former MP Boris Mijič for not fulfilling his obligations to workers and the state, and having an inconsistent life history, making him unsuitable for the position of MP. He mentioned ongoing discussions with the President of the Republic, Nataša Pirc Musar, regarding cooperation and potential parliamentary inquiry into the 'Black Cube' issue. Meanwhile, Golob commented on the controversy surrounding the selection process for an EU representative to the Sahel region, where former Foreign Minister Tanja Fajon was a candidate. He expressed hope that rationality would prevail in the process and that a suitable Slovenian candidate would eventually be confirmed.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames criticism against political figures like Boris Mijič and the 'Black Cube' issue in a manner that suggests skepticism toward certain political actors and support for institutional accountability. The emphasis on constitutional order and criticism of specific politicians aligns with

ReporterIndependentProgressive6 hr. ago

The article discusses concerns raised by MP Pirc Musar regarding ongoing violations of the constitutional order in the Slovenian parliament. He notes that the coalition majority, including Resica, failed to approve the agenda for a session where opposition committees would investigate Black Cube and party financing. President Golob emphasized that the president's office should defend the valid constitutional order and criticized the claim that the president should be the sole interpreter of constitutional law. He stated that the president is neither educated nor qualified to interpret the constitutional order. Golob described his conversation with Pirc Musar as constructive and promised continued dialogue. He also mentioned plans to start working in the shadows with the government starting in September, stressing the need for concrete content rather than consensus alone. Meanwhile, President Borut Pahor hosted leaders of opposition parties and expressed her desire for constructive cooperation and a culture of dialogue.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the discussion around the qualifications and role of the president in interpreting the constitution, which aligns with left-leaning critiques of executive power. The emphasis on 'constructive dialogue' and the critique of the current parliamentary process reflect a leftward slant.