ON
← Back to feed
Francesca Hong’s “Thanksgiving-Gate” Shows Her Detractors Are Totally Out of Ideas
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 days ago

Francesca Hong’s “Thanksgiving-Gate” Shows Her Detractors Are Totally Out of Ideas

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong, a 37-year-old democratic socialist and state lawmaker, has become the leading contender for Wisconsin's Democratic Party nomination despite facing intense opposition from moderate candidates like David Crowley. Hong's campaign has been overshadowed by controversy over a deleted 2020 tweet in which she called for canceling Thanksgiving due to its historical ties to colonialism and Indigenous harm. Critics, including media outlets like the New York Times and the New York Post, have focused heavily on this issue rather than her policy proposals, such as free childcare, data center moratoriums, and revitalizing Wisconsin's Limburger cheese industry. Opponents argue that her comments on Thanksgiving are more newsworthy than substantive policy discussions, highlighting a broader struggle within the Democratic establishment to counter her progressive stance.

Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez found herself defending Democratic gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong after questions arose regarding her past remarks on Thanksgiving. During an appearance on ABC's This Week with Jonathan Karl, AOC addressed concerns raised by Karl about Hong’s previously expressed views, stating that Hong had evolved beyond those statements. The conversation took place amid heightened scrutiny of Hong’s record following revelations of her past comments on the holiday. Francesca Hong, a 37-year-old democratic socialist, state lawmaker, and former chef, has emerged as the leading candidate for the Democratic Party’s gubernatorial nomination in Wisconsin. Despite growing opposition from moderate rivals, Hong appears poised to secure the nomination. Her primary opponent, Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley, received just over 3,000 more votes than Hong, though he had the endorsement of outgoing Governor Tony Evers. The race has drawn intense focus, particularly due to the controversy surrounding Hong’s past remarks on Thanksgiving. In a now-deleted tweet from 2020, Hong had stated, “Cancel Thanksgiving. Should have done this in 1621. If it takes a worldwide pandemic for us to realize we should stop celebrating colonialism and the original superspreader event that killed Indigenous folx and women so be it.” These comments resurfaced during the campaign, drawing criticism from both media and political figures. Despite the backlash, Hong maintained that the issue of Thanksgiving was not central to the campaign, emphasizing instead her policy proposals related to childcare, data centers, and the restoration of Wisconsin’s Limburger cheese industry. Media coverage of Hong’s campaign has largely focused on her past remarks rather than her policy positions. Headlines such as “A Democratic Socialist Disparaged Thanksgiving” and “Can Voters Forgive Her?” highlighted the controversy, although few Wisconsin voters were found to oppose Hong on this basis. The New York Post speculated about a dystopian future under Hong’s governance, imagining a world devoid of football and family gatherings. Meanwhile, Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden questioned whether Hong’s critics had considered the context of her comments, suggesting that the discourse was overly academic. Despite the media frenzy, Hong’s campaign has demonstrated resilience. With over 300,000 votes, she achieved one of the highest vote totals ever recorded for a Wisconsin Democrat in a contested primary. Her performance surpassed that of Governor Tony Evers, who had won his initial nomination in 2018. Although she narrowly missed securing the nomination, her showing underscored the strength of a new political movement within the Democratic Party. Analysts noted that her campaign had defied expectations, challenging the notion that socialist candidates lacked electability in key states. Hong emphasized that her campaign was not solely about personal success but about building a broader movement. Addressing supporters after the primary, she stated, “We have built something that will change politics forever. What we have done will be remembered. I don’t even know how the final results will end. But what I do know is that we are ready to keep fighting.” Her message resonated with many, highlighting the potential for a shift in political dynamics within Wisconsin. As the primary concluded, the focus shifted toward the general election, where Hong could face Republican nominee Tom Tiffany. Internal Democratic surveys suggested that Hong could still be a competitive candidate, despite the challenges posed by the media narrative surrounding her past comments. Her campaign continued to emphasize policy platforms and grassroots mobilization, positioning her as a viable alternative to traditional centrist candidates. The outcome of the general election remains uncertain, but Hong’s influence on the Democratic Party landscape is likely to persist.

Go to the primary sources (8)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

RealClearPolitics logoRealClearPoliticsIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 4013 days ago
Difficult for Democrats To Escape 'Crazy' Woke Ideas

Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez discussed Wisconsin gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong's past comments during an interview on ABC's This Week with Jonathan Karl. Karl questioned AOC about Hong's remarks suggesting Thanksgiving should be canceled. AOC initially avoided answering but later claimed Hong had evolved beyond those views. The conversation highlights ongoing debates over cultural and historical perspectives within American politics.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the exchange between AOC and Karl without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the discussion without editorializing or using biased language, focusing on the content of the dialogue rather than taking a stance on the issue itself.

Why factuality (85): Article discusses Francesca Hong's past comments about Thanksgiving and her political stance, but does not reference the primary source document about fundraising or the Democratic primary race. It focuses on unrelated political commentary rather than the factual details of the primary race. Therefo

Why objectivity (40): The tone is highly critical and emotionally charged, suggesting that Hong's past comments are problematic. The article frames her as a controversial figure without presenting multiple perspectives or balancing viewpoints.

The Intercept logoThe InterceptIndependentConservativeFactual 50Objective 3012 days ago
Francesca Hong’s “Thanksgiving-Gate” Shows Her Detractors Are Totally Out of Ideas

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong, a 37-year-old democratic socialist and state lawmaker, has become the leading contender for Wisconsin's Democratic Party nomination despite facing intense opposition from moderate candidates like David Crowley. Hong's campaign has been overshadowed by controversy over a deleted 2020 tweet in which she called for canceling Thanksgiving due to its historical ties to colonialism and Indigenous harm. Critics, including media outlets like the New York Times and the New York Post, have focused heavily on this issue rather than her policy proposals, such as free childcare, data center moratoriums, and revitalizing Wisconsin's Limburger cheese industry. Opponents argue that her comments on Thanksgiving are more newsworthy than substantive policy discussions, highlighting a broader struggle within the Democratic establishment to counter her progressive stance.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Francesca Hong's criticism of Thanksgiving as a radical or extreme position, using loaded language such as 'nefarious designs against the holidays' and 'dystopian socialist future.' It emphasizes the backlash against her views, portraying them as out-of-touch with mainstream norms

Why factuality (50): The article discusses Francesca Hong's past social media post about 'canceling Thanksgiving' and frames it as a political strategy rather than focusing on her actual policy platform. It lacks direct reference to her policy proposals and instead emphasizes her perceived radicalism, which diverges fro

Why objectivity (30): The tone is highly critical and dismissive of Hong's political stance, suggesting her detractors are out of ideas. The article uses emotionally charged language and frames her position as a distraction from real issues, indicating a biased and unbalanced perspective.

The Nation logoThe NationIndependentProgressiveFactual 30Objective 5010 days ago
Francesca Hong: “Our Movement Is Strong, and the Work Isn’t Done”

Francesca Hong, a democratic socialist running for Wisconsin governor, received around 312,000 votes in the Democratic primary, making her the top vote-getter for the party's gubernatorial nomination. This surpassed the vote total of former Governor Tony Evers when he was first nominated in 2018. Despite facing opposition from Evers and intense media scrutiny, Hong nearly tied with David Crowley, the eventual winner who secured the nomination by a narrow margin. The article challenges narratives that frame Hong's loss as a defeat for progressive politics, drawing parallels to historical figures like Robert La Follette and William Proxmire, who were initially dismissed but later reshaped political landscapes. Hong emphasizes the significance of grassroots movement and the potential for transformative change.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Francesca Hong's campaign and its implications through a lens that supports progressive movements and critiques mainstream media narratives that dismiss her as a 'stunning loss' for the left. It uses historical examples of underdog politicians who eventually transformed politics,颂

Why factuality (30): The article discusses the 2026 Wisconsin gubernatorial primary involving Francesca Hong, which is not covered in the primary source document. The primary source focuses on the 2018 election between Tony Evers and Scott Walker, making this article factually inaccurate regarding the event described.

Why objectivity (50): The article has a clear bias towards Francesca Hong and frames her loss as a setback for the left, which indicates a lack of neutrality and balance in presenting the information.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories