United StatesOwnership & classification
Founded: 2014
Ownership
The Intercept launched in February 2014 under First Look Media, founded by journalists Glenn Greenwald, Jeremy Scahill and Laura Poitras and bankrolled by eBay co-founder Pierre Omidyar, who pledged up to $250 million to the venture. In January 2023 it was spun off from Omidyar's First Look Institute and now operates as an independent nonprofit organization.
Funding
Originally underwritten almost entirely by Omidyar, who ceased financial support in 2022, The Intercept now relies on reader and listener donations and grants as a nonprofit. The loss of its founding patron forced sharp cutbacks, including laying off roughly a third of its newsroom in early 2024.
Affiliation & stance
The Intercept is a left-leaning, adversarial investigative outlet with no party, church or government control; it is governed as an independent nonprofit funded by donations. Because it is privately/charitably owned with editorial independence from any party or state, it is classified INDEPENDENT.
Editorial lean
- Our estimate
- Left
- Measured from coverage
- Lean Leftbased on 70
72/100
Factual
62/100
Objective
72
Articles
72
reports
Top stories
Most covered right now
Ten years after Brexit, the U.K. marks a lost decade
Graham asks Trump to move forward with Clayton's DNI nomination
Graham Platner - Yes, Collins usually votes with Trump, as Platner said. But she broke with him at key moments.
Raman clinches spot in Los Angeles mayoral runoff against Bass, as Pratt slips to third
Confirmed Ebola cases in Congo outbreak top 1,000 with 254 deaths, authorities say
Meet Aber Kawas, DSA-Backed Palestinian American Who Won New York State Senate Primary
Top Pentagon Official Admits Boat Strike May Have Killed Victims of Human Trafficking
In California, a Former Biden Official Will Face Fox News Personality for Governor
Recent coverage
Three things to watch amid Anthropic’s latest feud with the government
Anthropic, an AI company based in the United States, developed an advanced AI model called Mythos, which demonstrated exceptional capabilities in handling code. Concerned about potential cybersecurity risks, Anthropic shared limited access with cybersecurity experts before releasing a modified version called Fable to the public. However, the U.S. government quickly intervened, citing national security concerns and imposing export restrictions on Fable. Anthropic subsequently revoked access to both models. This incident has sparked discussions about the broader implications of AI regulation, with some arguing that the government's response was overly reactive rather than well-planned. Additionally, the event has raised questions about the reliability of American AI companies, prompting European leaders to consider accelerating their own AI development efforts. Meanwhile, open-source AI models from China have gained attention due to their affordability and accessibility, potentially influencing global AI strategies.
Israel and Lebanon sign framework agreement
Israel and Lebanon signed a framework agreement on Friday in Washington, mediated by the Trump administration, marking a diplomatic breakthrough. The agreement aims to end Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon and restore Lebanon's territorial integrity, though implementation remains uncertain due to Hezbollah's continued influence. The framework includes immediate steps like pilot projects where Israeli forces will withdraw from specific areas and Lebanese troops will deploy, with U.S. involvement to ensure these zones are free of Hezbollah. A senior Israeli official emphasized maintaining security until Hezbollah is disarmed, while a Hezbollah-affiliated leader criticized the agreement, warning of potential civil conflict. The agreement comes amid a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, with Israel conducting targeted strikes against perceived threats. U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, praised the agreement as a step toward peace, promising $100 million in aid for Lebanon.
Trump’s Communist Boogeyman Playbook: Charging Protesters as Terrorists
The article discusses the sentencing of eight anti-ICE activists involved in a protest outside the Prairieland Detention Facility in Texas, resulting in prison terms ranging from 30 to 100 years. These individuals were labeled by the government as 'antifa' operatives and faced terrorism-related charges. Reporter Matt Sledge criticizes the Justice Department's claims, noting a disconnect between official statements and the evidence presented during trials. Author Mark Bray argues that the Trump administration uses 'antifa' as a scare tactic to suppress dissent, similar to historical use of 'Communist' as a boogeyman. The case is seen as part of a broader strategy to criminalize opposition to ICE and the Trump administration, with potential implications for other protests. The article highlights concerns over the misuse of terrorism charges and the impact on civil liberties.
Trump Claimed to Run Venezuela. After Earthquakes, He’s Walking That Back.
Following the abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, U.S. President Donald Trump initially asserted that the U.S. would 'run' Venezuela, declaring 'we're in charge.' However, after two major earthquakes struck Venezuela, causing significant casualties and destruction, Trump shifted to offering limited humanitarian assistance rather than asserting direct control. A U.S. government official suggested that Trump's response does not reflect the extent of U.S. influence over Venezuela, which they describe as a 'vassal state.' Meanwhile, Venezuelan American organizations and progressive foreign policy groups plan to request substantial, unconditional humanitarian aid from the Trump administration, citing U.S. responsibility for the crisis caused by sanctions and military actions. These groups argue that U.S. aid must match the scale of the harm inflicted. Trump has previously claimed that the U.S. has profited significantly from Venezuela's oil resources, recovering war costs 28 times over, but critics highlight economic analyses indicating that U.S. policies have exacerbated Venezuela's struggles.
The Left Just Keeps Winning. It's Time for Democrats to Bend the Knee.
The article discusses the growing influence of democratic socialists within the Democratic Party, highlighted by recent election victories in New York and other states. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who is positioning himself as a potential future House speaker, faced a crowd of socialists who chanted 'You're next!' during an election celebration. Despite Jeffries' attempts to downplay the significance of these wins, the article argues that the rise of leftist candidates poses an existential challenge to the traditional moderate wing of the Democratic Party. In New York, several candidates endorsed by Mayor Zohran Mamdani won decisively, along with most of the Democratic Socialists of America's down-ballot slate. Similar trends emerged in Maine, where Graham Platner defeated Governor Janet Mills in the Democratic Senate primary, despite her aggressive recruitment by Chuck Schumer. The article suggests that these developments indicate a broader shift within the party toward more progressive policies.
Tommy Tuberville - Is the bipartisan housing bill for “a lot of people that are here illegally”?
The article examines claims by Senator Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., that the bipartisan 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act benefits undocumented immigrants in the U.S. The bill, which passed the Senate with strong bipartisan support, aims to increase affordable housing supply and reduce costs. However, the legislation does not explicitly provide benefits to undocumented individuals, nor does it alter eligibility criteria for federal housing assistance. Experts note that while undocumented immigrants could potentially benefit from increased housing supply, they are already ineligible for most HUD programs. Tuberville opposed the bill, arguing it would primarily aid undocumented populations, while fellow Alabama Senator Katie Britt disputed his claim, stating the legislation provides no funding for undocumented immigrants. The article highlights the controversy surrounding the bill's impact on immigration issues and the broader debate over housing affordability.
I Am A Woman Who Had To Compete Against A Man And It’s Anything But Fair Play
The article discusses the impact of Title IX on women's sports and raises concerns about the fairness of allowing biological males to compete in women's athletic categories. The author, a former Division I track and field athlete, describes her dedication to training and competing at a high level, only to face the challenge of competing against a biological male athlete who had previously competed in the men's category. She highlights the physiological differences between males and females, noting that males can run approximately 11% faster and accelerate 20% faster than females. These differences, she argues, were acknowledged when Title IX established separate athletic categories. The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining these distinctions to preserve opportunities for female athletes, such as scholarships, championships, and record-breaking achievements. It also references upcoming Supreme Court cases, Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., which could determine the future of women's sports. The author criticizes the argument that allowing biological males into women's competitions is an act of inclusion, arguing that it undermines the fairness and protections,
How Florida’s Cuban Diaspora and the Israeli Lobby Came Together — and Are Coming Apart
The article discusses the influence of Florida's Cuban diaspora and the Israeli lobby on U.S. foreign policy toward Latin America under President Donald Trump. It highlights a pattern of aggressive U.S. intervention, including regime change attempts in Venezuela, military actions against Cuba, election interference in several countries, economic sanctions on Brazil, and support for authoritarian regimes. The piece argues that a small, wealthy Latin American diaspora centered in Miami has shaped U.S. hemispheric policy through political lobbying and alliances with the Republican Party. This group, which includes former Cuban exiles, views democratic reforms as threats and supports figures like Trump and Marco Rubio as protectors of their interests.
Trump taps former Oklahoma state trooper Lance Schroyer to head ICE
President Trump announced the nomination of Lance Schroyer, a former Oklahoma state trooper with over 29 years of law enforcement experience, to become the next director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Schroyer would replace Todd Lyons, who resigned in late May, with David Venturella currently serving as acting director. Trump highlighted Schroyer's experience in removing 'illegal aliens' and emphasized his ability to detain and deport criminals, including murderers and drug traffickers. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin endorsed the appointment, noting Schroyer's background in large-scale operations under the 287(g) program. Trump urged the Senate to confirm Schroyer quickly, stating that ICE has not had a Senate-confirmed leader in 11 years. The Department of Homeland Security reported that ICE's workforce increased from around 10,000 to 22,000 officers since Trump took office in January 2025.
RFK Jr. Claims He’s Investigating Terrorism Now, Too
RFK Jr., the U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary, has claimed he is investigating the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a major Muslim civil rights organization, over alleged misuse of federal grant funds and potential ties to terrorism. This move follows pressure from conservative lawmakers like Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, who have raised unproven claims about CAIR's activities. CAIR has denied receiving federal funding from HHS and criticized RFK Jr.'s actions as unfounded. The controversy comes amid heightened anti-Muslim rhetoric during an election year, with critics suggesting the investigation is politically motivated to energize the Republican base. While CAIR national has not received HHS grants, some state-level branches have accepted federal funds for legal aid related to Afghan refugee resettlement.
Israeli forces detain Palestinian women in West Bank raids
Israeli security forces conducted early morning raids in the West Bank, detaining five Palestinian women, including Itaf Badr, a member of a health charity board. The raids occurred in cities such as Hebron, Ramallah, Nablus, and Bethlehem, with families and Palestinian rights groups reporting the incidents. While Palestinian men and boys have historically been the main targets of Israeli military actions, there has been an increasing trend of detaining women and girls. According to the Palestinian Prisoners’ Club, the number of Palestinian women and girls in Israeli detention has more than doubled since the start of the Israel-Hamas war and increased by 80% since 2026. Some detainees were arrested for social media posts criticizing the occupation or the Gaza war, while others were affiliated with Palestinian political parties' student branches. Many were held without formal charges under Israel’s administrative detention policy. The Israeli military stated that some detainees were suspected of promoting terrorist activities, though some have since been released.
Settlement as to "California Law Prohibiting Anyone from Sharing Lawfully Obtained Information About Sealed Arrest Records"
The city of San Francisco and the state of California have reached a settlement in a lawsuit regarding a law that restricts the sharing of information about sealed arrest records. The settlement prevents journalists and advocates from facing civil penalties for reporting on a tech CEO's sealed arrest record, though the law itself remains unchanged. Critics argue the law is unconstitutional and infringes on free speech rights, with organizations like the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) and the First Amendment Coalition urging its repeal. The dispute arose after the San Francisco City Attorney's Office demanded that journalist Jack Poulson and Substack remove their reporting on the sealed arrest report of tech CEO Maury Blackman. The law, California Penal Code § 851.92(c), prohibits anyone from publishing or sharing information related to sealed arrest reports, regardless of how they obtained the information. Legal experts emphasize that the First Amendment protects the right to share lawfully obtained information, even if it involves sealed records.
Colorado Democrats choose between insurgent progressives and veteran incumbents
The article discusses the dynamics of Colorado's Democratic primaries, highlighting a growing divide between progressive insurgents and established politicians. In the 1st Congressional District race, incumbent Rep. Diana DeGette faces challenger Melat Kiros, a 29-year-old democratic socialist, while in the Senate race, Sen. John Hickenlooper contends with state Sen. Julie Gonzales, an 'insurgent progressive.' The article notes that younger, more radical candidates are gaining traction, as seen in recent New York primaries where democratic socialists defeated establishment-backed incumbents. While DeGette has held her seat for nearly 30 years, Kiros gained significant support during a Democratic assembly, securing over double her votes. Similarly, Gonzales challenges Hickenlooper, accusing him of being an 'incrementalist.' The article also mentions the gubernatorial race, where Attorney General Phil Weiser and U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet struggle to differentiate their platforms, both criticizing each other for insufficient opposition to Trump. The outcome of these races could signal broader shifts within the Democratic Party.
Overlooked
Under-reported & one-sided
Nothing flagged as overlooked yet.