In a significant development that highlights ongoing tensions between the current administration and previous policies, the Trump-era Department of Justice (DOJ) has come under renewed scrutiny following a recent report by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Last year, the Trump DOJ announced it would discontinue oversight of several troubled police departments in cities such as Louisville, Kentucky, and Minneapolis. At the time, the decision was justified by the administration as being "factually unjustified." However, a new report by the ACLU challenges this assertion, revealing that these departments continued to exhibit problematic behavior, including the use of excessive force against individuals experiencing mental health crises.
The ACLU conducted a thorough examination of police use-of-force reports from four communities where the Biden administration had identified issues of unconstitutional policing. Their findings indicated that local law enforcement agencies continued to misuse Tasers and failed to adequately review incidents involving the use of force. For example, in Minneapolis, officers repeatedly shocked a compliant individual with a Taser, while in Louisville, an officer broke a man’s car window during a mental health crisis, leading to further escalation of the situation. These instances underscore the potential risks associated with the discontinuation of federal oversight in these areas.
The report spans from late 2024, following President Donald Trump's re-election, to early 2025, as the new administration shifted the DOJ's focus away from civil rights enforcement. The ACLU aimed to hold local police accountable in the absence of federal oversight, emphasizing the need for continued reform in communities where there were concerns about excessive force and racial targeting. To achieve this goal, the organization requested public records detailing officers' use of force and other relevant documentation from multiple cities, including Phoenix, Louisville, Worcester, Minneapolis, Mount Vernon, and Memphis.
The ACLU also examined records from Rankin County, Mississippi, where members of the Rankin County Sheriff’s Department, known as the "Goon Squad," were convicted of beating and torturing two Black men in 2024. Although the Biden administration initiated an investigation into the sheriff's department, reports suggest that the Trump administration continues to conduct the probe. A spokesperson for the sheriff’s department stated that they would cooperate fully with the investigation to demonstrate that all aspects of their policing practices adhere to constitutional standards.
The Justice Department did not respond to inquiries regarding the report, while White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson dismissed the ACLU’s findings as partisan rhetoric from an organization suffering from "Trump Derangement Syndrome." She defended the administration's approach, asserting that President Trump is a strong advocate for law enforcement and encourages them to enforce the law effectively.
In a separate but related matter, former Trump national security adviser John Bolton has pleaded guilty to mishandling classified government information. Bolton, who authored a controversial memoir titled *The Room Where It Happened*, faces a potential prison sentence of up to five years and a $2.25 million fine. His legal team and the Justice Department reached a plea agreement that includes a maximum 60-month prison term, along with community service and a debriefing session with national security officials.
Bolton's case has sparked discussions about the broader implications for the Trump administration, especially given the ongoing investigations into other high-profile figures. While the circumstances surrounding Bolton's actions are complex, the case raises questions about the administration's approach to handling classified information and its potential impact on national security. As the legal proceedings unfold, the outcomes may provide insight into how the administration navigates these sensitive issues moving forward.
6 reports
CBS News (US)IndependentCenterFactual 98Objective 957 days agoFormer Trump national security adviser John Bolton pleaded guilty to one count of retaining classified information and agreed to pay a $2.25 million fine. Bolton, who is now a critic of former President Donald Trump, was indicted last year on 18 counts related to sharing sensitive government information with two relatives over a seven-year period for potential use in a book. As part of the plea deal, Bolton will receive a maximum 60-month prison sentence, undergo a debriefing with national security officials, and complete 100 hours of community service aimed at preventing the unauthorized disclosure of classified information. His sentencing is scheduled for October 28. Bolton’s attorney stated that his client accepted responsibility for his actions to save government resources.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the facts of Bolton's guilty plea and the terms of his plea agreement without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from Bolton and his attorney, as well as details from the indictment and the court proceedings. There is no evident loaded language or one-sided,
Why these scores (Factual 98 · Objective 95): Precise and factual account of Bolton's plea deal. Very neutral and straightforward reporting with no overt bias.
AxiosIndependentCenterFactual 97Objective 852 days agoFormer CIA Director John Brennan has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, requesting a court order to preserve records related to ongoing investigations into him. Brennan argues that if he is later charged, these records would be crucial in determining whether the prosecution constitutes unconstitutional political retaliation. His legal team claims the Trump administration has deviated from standard record-keeping procedures and has a 'consistent pattern of irregular conduct' in similar cases. They assert that the Justice Department has engaged in a 'retribution campaign' targeting Brennan due to his past criticisms of Trump. In response, a Justice Department spokesperson called it 'rich' that Brennan would make such accusations but declined to elaborate further. Brennan’s legal team emphasized that the lawsuit aims to ensure the government preserves evidence needed for courts to assess his constitutional claims.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Brennan's allegations of political retaliation and the Justice Department's dismissive response without overtly favoring either side. It provides direct quotes from both parties and contextualizes the issue within broader concerns about executive conduct and legal integrity
Why these scores (Factual 97 · Objective 85): Accurate with detailed context about the legal arguments and Brennan's claims. Some slight framing toward Brennan's perspective but still mostly objective.
CBS News (US)IndependentCenterFactual 96Objective 882 days ago Former CIA Director John Brennan sues DOJ, Trump officials over criminal probesFormer CIA Director John Brennan has filed a lawsuit against the Justice Department and several Trump administration officials, seeking a court order to preserve records related to his ongoing criminal investigations. Brennan, a known critic of President Trump, faces two separate DOJ probes: one alleging he lied to Congress about Russian interference in the 2016 election, and another investigating potential conspiracies involving Obama- and Biden-era officials. Brennan's legal team claims the Trump administration is using criminal proceedings to target political opponents and argues that losing relevant documents could hinder judicial review of any future charges against him. The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, a Biden appointee.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the facts of the lawsuit and quotes Brennan's legal team without overtly favoring either side. It does not use emotionally charged language or selectively present information to support one perspective over another.
Why these scores (Factual 96 · Objective 88): Well-sourced and accurate account of Brennan's lawsuit. Slightly more narrative in style but remains largely balanced.
SlateIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 807 days agoJohn Bolton, a former high-ranking Republican official and national security advisor under President Donald Trump, has pleaded guilty to mishandling classified government information. He faces up to five years in prison and a $2.25 million fine as part of a plea deal. The charges stem from allegations that he shared sensitive information with family members while working on his memoir, 'The Room Where It Happened.' While the New York Times reports that court documents suggest Bolton may end up serving time, his sentencing is not yet determined, and the judge appointed by Barack Obama could impose a lighter sentence. Bolton had previously clashed with Trump over foreign policy decisions and criticized him in his memoir.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the situation as potentially politically motivated, suggesting that the Justice Department might be targeting Trump critics. It highlights Bolton's criticism of Trump in his memoir and notes that other Trump adversaries have faced legal action, implying a potential partisan angle.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): Accurate reporting on Bolton's guilty plea but includes some commentary suggesting potential bias in the justice system.
Breitbart NewsIndependentLeft2 days agoFormer CIA Director John Brennan has sued the Trump administration, seeking a court order to preserve records related to federal investigations into his conduct. The lawsuit claims these documents could reveal the reasons behind the probes and potentially demonstrate that the investigations were politically motivated rather than based on evidence of wrongdoing. Brennan's legal team argues that the records might be deleted before any prosecution occurs and that they are necessary to assess the legitimacy of the investigations. The case names multiple high-profile officials, including former Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and current CIA Director John Ratcliffe, as defendants. The probe originated from a referral by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, which alleged that Brennan lied during congressional testimony regarding Russia's involvement in the 2016 election. Brennan denies the accusations and maintains the investigation is politically driven.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the lawsuit as a defense against politically motivated investigations, emphasizing Brennan's position as a victim of executive retaliation. It highlights the potential for political bias in the DOJ's handling of the case and suggests that the administration's actions may have been
The Daily WireIndependentLeft2 days agoFormer CIA Director John Brennan, who led the intelligence community's investigation into potential Russian collusion with Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, has sued the Trump administration to ensure the preservation of records related to ongoing investigations into his conduct. No criminal charges have been filed against Brennan, but his legal team claims that any future prosecution would constitute political retaliation. The lawsuit seeks to prevent the loss of potentially relevant documents that could be used in a future case. The Justice Department has not confirmed whether Brennan is under investigation, though the scope of the inquiries has expanded. These investigations include scrutiny of Brennan's testimony to Congress and his role in the 2017 intelligence assessment that concluded Russia aimed to influence the election. Brennan denies wrongdoing and asserts that the intelligence community's findings were accurate.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the situation as a potential political retaliation by the Trump administration against Brennan, citing his legal team's argument that the administration is using criminal process to target its perceived adversaries. This perspective aligns with a left-leaning interpretation of the
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
United States
