ON
← Back to feed
Five years after the fall of Kabul, 'war on terror' ghosts have come home
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsProgressive2 days ago

Five years after the fall of Kabul, 'war on terror' ghosts have come home

The article reflects on the five-year anniversary of the U.S.-led withdrawal from Afghanistan, highlighting the chaotic evacuation of Kabul in 2021 as a symbolic end to two decades of Western military involvement. It compares the event to historical moments like the fall of Saigon and the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan, emphasizing the perceived failure of Western military interventions. The piece argues that the Taliban's takeover was orderly and peaceful, contrasting with the violence and destruction associated with Western bombing campaigns such as the use of Tomahawk cruise missiles and 'daisy cutter' bombs. The author suggests that the Afghan resistance has historically outlasted foreign occupiers, and criticizes Western powers for failing to learn from past conflicts like the Anglo-Afghan Wars. The tone implies a critical view of Western military intervention and a belief in the resilience of Afghan independence.

Five years after the fall of Kabul, echoes of the long-standing "war on terror" have returned to haunt the Western psyche. On August 15, 2021, the last U.S. military aircraft departed from Hamid Karzai International Airport, marking the end of a two-decade-long military presence in Afghanistan. This moment, captured in harrowing footage of civilians scrambling onto departing planes, bore striking similarities to the evacuation scenes from Saigon in 1975, reinforcing a narrative of imperial overreach and strategic miscalculation. Outside the airport, the reality of the situation unfolded differently. Unlike the dramatic depictions of chaos and destruction often portrayed by Western media, the transition of power in Kabul was marked by an unexpected order and tranquility. The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan assumed control without the violent upheaval that many had anticipated. For many Afghans, this represented a return to a familiar pattern, resistance against foreign forces culminating in the withdrawal of occupying powers. The experience of leaving Afghanistan in 2001 offers a poignant contrast to the current scenario. Back then, the author fled a country ravaged by Western military operations, including the devastating effects of Tomahawk cruise missiles and B-52 bombings. Now, witnessing the return of stability to a place once subjected to such intense conflict, there's a sense of vindication for those who believed that the resilience of the Afghan people would ultimately prevail over foreign intervention. The recent developments underscore a strategic failure for the West, one that could have been avoided had historical precedents been heeded. The British faced similar challenges during their three invasions of Afghanistan between 1839 and 1919, each ending in retreat and geopolitical embarrassment. Despite these repeated failures, Western powers continue to underestimate the depth of Afghan resistance, driven by a belief in their own superiority. Modern military leaders attempt to reframe the narrative, suggesting that the U.S. was never truly defeated on the battlefield. However, admissions from within the British House of Commons defense committee and former high-ranking officials like General Sir Richard Barrons reveal a more sobering truth, the Taliban emerged victorious, and the Western effort in Afghanistan concluded in comprehensive defeat. The irony lies in how the West has historically viewed resistance movements. During the 1980s, the Afghan mujahideen were celebrated as freedom fighters for their role in dismantling the Soviet Union. Their sacrifices were instrumental in achieving a significant geopolitical shift. However, once their utility to Western interests waned, the narrative surrounding them transformed, reflecting a selective memory that conveniently forgets past alliances. As the dust settles on the departure of foreign troops, the stage is set for a new chapter in Afghanistan's history. Those who once endured the harsh realities of imprisonment and oppression now hold the reins of power, shaping the future of their nation according to their own vision and values. The legacy of the "war on terror" continues to unfold, revealing the complex interplay between resistance, occupation, and the enduring quest for self-determination in a region steeped in history and struggle.

Go to the primary sources (6)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Middle East Eye logoMiddle East EyeIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 552 days ago
Five years after the fall of Kabul, 'war on terror' ghosts have come home

The article reflects on the five-year anniversary of the U.S.-led withdrawal from Afghanistan, highlighting the chaotic evacuation of Kabul in 2021 as a symbolic end to two decades of Western military involvement. It compares the event to historical moments like the fall of Saigon and the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan, emphasizing the perceived failure of Western military interventions. The piece argues that the Taliban's takeover was orderly and peaceful, contrasting with the violence and destruction associated with Western bombing campaigns such as the use of Tomahawk cruise missiles and 'daisy cutter' bombs. The author suggests that the Afghan resistance has historically outlasted foreign occupiers, and criticizes Western powers for failing to learn from past conflicts like the Anglo-Afghan Wars. The tone implies a critical view of Western military intervention and a belief in the resilience of Afghan independence.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the U.S. withdrawal as a strategic failure and highlights the perceived arrogance of Western powers, while celebrating the Taliban's peaceful takeover as a triumph of Afghan resistance. It uses emotionally charged language ('chaotic', 'humiliating', 'catastrophic') and references

Why factuality (65): The article references the final US military flight leaving Kabul and mentions the chaotic evacuation, aligning with the primary source document. However, it presents a highly subjective interpretation of events, comparing the situation to Saigon 1975 and suggesting a 'quiet transition' that contrad

Why objectivity (55): The tone is clearly critical of Western military involvement and uses emotionally charged language such as 'chaotic,' 'humiliating,' and 'imperial overreach.' The article frames the event as a strategic failure and includes personal narratives, indicating a strong ideological bias rather than a neut

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories