ON
← Back to feed
5 Years After Taliban Takeover, Women & Girls in Afghanistan Have Disappeared from Public Life
United States🏛️ PoliticsProgressive3 days ago

5 Years After Taliban Takeover, Women & Girls in Afghanistan Have Disappeared from Public Life

Five years after the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan, women and girls face severe restrictions on their public lives, according to reports from UNESCO and the United Nations. Educational access for girls has drastically declined, with over 2.5 million barred from secondary and higher education. Women's organizations warn that many may shut down due to funding shortages. Human rights groups describe the policies as a 'gender apartheid' system, with women restricted from public spaces, required to have male guardians, and subjected to 'morality laws.' Domestic violence protections have been rolled back, leading to increased child marriage rates. International figures like Malala Yousafzai condemn the situation, highlighting the loss of female roles in society, while noting ongoing resistance from Afghan women.

Five years after the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan, women and girls have effectively vanished from public life, according to human rights groups and international observers. The withdrawal of U.S. troops in August 2021 marked the beginning of a severe crackdown on female participation in society, with education, employment, and social freedoms drastically restricted. UNESCO estimates that nearly 2.5 million girls are now excluded from secondary and higher education under Taliban rule. The United Nations has warned that over half of the women's organizations operating in Afghanistan may shut down within the next year due to financial constraints. The restrictions imposed by the Taliban have extended well beyond formal institutions. Women are prohibited from using public parks and other communal spaces, and books authored by women have been removed from libraries. Those wishing to venture outside the home must be accompanied by a male relative, a requirement that underscores the regime’s strict enforcement of gender-based controls. Morality laws further limit women’s ability to engage in public discourse, including singing or reciting poetry aloud. These measures have been described by activists as part of a broader strategy to erase women and girls from public life, with some labeling the system as gender apartheid. Women have also lost legal protections against domestic violence and are now considered subordinate to their husbands. Forced marriages have increased in frequency, exacerbated by the economic hardship that has gripped the nation. The erosion of women’s rights has had profound implications for Afghanistan’s future, with experts warning that the denial of education to girls will hinder the country’s long-term development and capacity to provide essential public services. At the United Nations, the Danish representative, Christina Markus Lassen, condemned the Taliban’s actions, calling the ban on girls' education a grave violation of fundamental rights. She emphasized that Afghanistan remains the sole country globally where girls are systematically denied access to secondary and higher learning. This policy, she argued, has far-reaching consequences for the nation’s economic stability and social progress. Malala Yousafzai, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate who survived an assassination attempt by the Taliban in 2012, has spoken out forcefully on the fifth anniversary of the group’s return to power. She described how women who once held positions such as doctors, engineers, and athletes are now barred from universities and jobs. Girls who previously attended school eagerly each morning are now confined to their homes, forbidden from pursuing education. Yousafzai called the Taliban’s policies a form of segregation and domination, likening them to gender apartheid. Despite the oppressive conditions, she noted that Afghan women continue to resist, organizing movements and seeking support from global allies. Negina Yari, an Afghan peace activist and former director of the Window for Hope organization, has been advocating for women’s rights from exile in Germany. Forced to flee Afghanistan shortly after the Taliban takeover, she has continued to mobilize international attention through aid campaigns and collaboration with organizations such as the Nobel Women’s Initiative. Yari has highlighted the resilience of Afghan women despite the ongoing crisis, emphasizing their efforts to build a movement that spans multiple countries. As the situation in Afghanistan deteriorates, the international community faces mounting pressure to respond. Activists warn that without urgent intervention, the rights of women and girls will continue to be undermined, with lasting consequences for the entire population. The struggle for gender equality in Afghanistan remains a critical issue, one that demands sustained attention and action.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Democracy Now! logoDemocracy Now!IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 783 days ago
5 Years After Taliban Takeover, Women & Girls in Afghanistan Have Disappeared from Public Life

Five years after the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan, women and girls face severe restrictions on their public lives, according to reports from UNESCO and the United Nations. Educational access for girls has drastically declined, with over 2.5 million barred from secondary and higher education. Women's organizations warn that many may shut down due to funding shortages. Human rights groups describe the policies as a 'gender apartheid' system, with women restricted from public spaces, required to have male guardians, and subjected to 'morality laws.' Domestic violence protections have been rolled back, leading to increased child marriage rates. International figures like Malala Yousafzai condemn the situation, highlighting the loss of female roles in society, while noting ongoing resistance from Afghan women.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Taliban's policies as a systemic violation of human rights, using strong language such as 'gender apartheid,' 'systematic erasure,' and 'grave abuse of the right to education.' It emphasizes international condemnation and highlights voices like Malala Yousafzai, which aligns a

Why factuality (85): The article cites UNESCO and the United Nations as sources for claims about the impact of the Taliban's policies on women's education and organizations. It references specific restrictions like bans on women in public spaces and the removal of women's books from libraries. These claims align with th

Why objectivity (78): The article presents a critical view of the Taliban's actions, using emotionally charged language such as 'systematic erasure' and 'gender apartheid.' While it provides factual information, the tone leans toward condemnation rather than neutrality, which affects its objectivity.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories