ON
← Back to feed
Ex-district judge, 90, kept under ‘digital arrest’, cheated of  ₹2.5 cr in Jaipur
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 days ago

Ex-district judge, 90, kept under ‘digital arrest’, cheated of ₹2.5 cr in Jaipur

A 90-year-old retired district judge in Jaipur, Rajasthan, reportedly fell victim to a 'digital arrest' scam where individuals impersonating CBI and RBI officials tricked him into transferring ₹2.5 crore. The fraud began with a WhatsApp video call from someone claiming to be a CBI officer, alleging a ₹50-crore hawala transaction involving Bhandari's bank account. The perpetrators threatened arrest, pressured him to comply with their demands, and instructed him to delete all communication records. After attempting to withdraw the funds at an SBI branch, the bank manager raised suspicions and alerted Bhandari's nephew, leading to the filing of a complaint with the police.

A 90-year-old retired district judge in Jaipur, Rajasthan, has fallen prey to a sophisticated cyber scam involving "digital arrest," resulting in a loss of approximately ₹2.5 crore. According to police reports, the elderly man, Ganpat Singh Bhandari, was allegedly targeted by individuals impersonating Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) officers and Reserve Bank of India (RBI) officials. These fraudsters reportedly kept him under constant surveillance via video calls for over 15 days, pressuring him to transfer large sums of money to various bank accounts. The incident began on July 28 when Bhandari received a WhatsApp video call from a person claiming to be a CBI officer based in Mumbai. The caller informed Bhandari that a ₹50-crore hawala transaction had been uncovered in Mumbai and that ₹40 lakh from the proceeds had been deposited into his State Bank of India (SBI) account. The fraudsters allegedly threatened to arrest Bhandari unless he cooperated with the investigation, warning that failure to comply could result in legal action against him and even involve his family members. Under intense psychological pressure, Bhandari was instructed to delete all communication records, including WhatsApp chats and call logs, following each interaction. He was also warned against discussing the situation with anyone, including family members, fearing public embarrassment or legal repercussions. For several days, he followed these instructions, believing the threat to be genuine. Between August 3 and August 10, Bhandari allegedly transferred around ₹2.5 crore to different bank accounts as directed by the callers. On Wednesday, while attempting to complete another transfer at the SBI branch in Johri Bazaar, the bank manager noticed unusual activity and questioned Bhandari about the transaction. Upon learning the context, the manager suspected a cyber fraud and immediately alerted Bhandari. The former judge then contacted his nephew, Ravindra Singh Mohanaut, who filed a formal complaint with the Jyoti Nagar police station. Police authorities confirmed that they received the complaint on Wednesday and have already recorded Bhandari's statement. A portion of the stolen funds, around ₹14 lakh, has been successfully frozen. Officers are currently investigating the remaining amount to determine how the money was transferred and subsequently withdrawn. They are also examining the bank accounts involved in the transactions in an effort to trace the perpetrators of the alleged cyber fraud. The case highlights the growing prevalence of "digital arrest" scams, where criminals exploit victims' fears of legal consequences by impersonating law enforcement agencies. Such schemes often rely on psychological manipulation and the creation of a false sense of urgency. In response to such incidents, the Supreme Court has recently tightened regulations to prevent similar occurrences, and the Reserve Bank of India is working on standard operating procedures to address cases involving mule bank accounts. As the investigation continues, authorities remain focused on recovering the lost funds and identifying the individuals responsible for the fraudulent activities. The case underscores the need for increased awareness among the public regarding the risks associated with unsolicited communications and the importance of verifying the authenticity of such claims before taking any action.

2 reports

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 8510 days ago
Ex-district judge, 90, kept under ‘digital arrest’, cheated of ₹2.5 cr in Jaipur

A 90-year-old retired district judge in Jaipur, Rajasthan, reportedly fell victim to a 'digital arrest' scam where individuals impersonating CBI and RBI officials tricked him into transferring ₹2.5 crore. The fraud began with a WhatsApp video call from someone claiming to be a CBI officer, alleging a ₹50-crore hawala transaction involving Bhandari's bank account. The perpetrators threatened arrest, pressured him to comply with their demands, and instructed him to delete all communication records. After attempting to withdraw the funds at an SBI branch, the bank manager raised suspicions and alerted Bhandari's nephew, leading to the filing of a complaint with the police.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the incident as a criminal fraud without overt ideological framing. While the involvement of law enforcement agencies like CBI and RBI adds a governmental element, the focus remains on the fraudulent activity itself rather than partisan commentary. The narrative is factual and客观

Why factuality (80): The article details the incident involving the 90-year-old ex-judge and the digital arrest scam, including the method used by fraudsters and the victim's experience. It cites the police complaint and mentions similar cases, providing a coherent narrative that aligns with the cross-source consensus o

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the events without overt emotional language. It focuses on the factual elements of the scam and the victim's experience, without taking sides or expressing personal opinion on the matter.

NDTV logoNDTVParty-alignedCenterFactual 75Objective 8010 days ago
Ex-Judge, 90, Duped Of Rs 2.5 Crore In 'Digital Arrest' Cyber Scam In Jaipur

An elderly ex-judge in Jaipur, Ganpat Singh Bhandari, reportedly fell victim to a cyber scam known as a 'digital arrest.' According to an FIR filed by his nephew, Ravindra Singh Mohnot, Bhandari was contacted via a WhatsApp video call from an unknown number on July 28. The caller allegedly impersonated law enforcement officials and convinced Bhandari to transfer a sum of Rs 2.5 crore. The incident highlights the increasing prevalence of digital fraud targeting individuals, particularly those who may be less familiar with modern technology.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the incident as a straightforward case of cybercrime without overtly emphasizing any political ideology or agenda. It focuses on the factual account of the scam and its implications for cybersecurity, rather than taking a partisan stance. The framing remains neutral, focusing on

Why factuality (75): The article briefly outlines the incident, referencing the FIR and the method used by the fraudsters. While it provides essential information, it lacks detailed context and specific details compared to the more comprehensive report in Article 1. It aligns with the general consensus but offers less d

Why objectivity (80): The article remains objective, focusing on the factual elements of the case without introducing subjective commentary. It presents the information in a straightforward manner, maintaining neutrality throughout.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories