ON
← Back to feed
Europe is arming itself out of fear of Russia, but a problem has arisen that money cannot solve
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

Europe is arming itself out of fear of Russia, but a problem has arisen that money cannot solve

Europska unija ubrzano se naoružava i mobilizira stotine milijardi eura kako bi pripremila svoje 27 članice za moguće vanjske prijetnje, posebno u kontekstu ruskog pritiska na granicama NATO-a i EU-a. Međutim, njeno najveće izazova ostaje nedostatak ljudi spremnih služiti u oružanim snagama. Europski povjerenik za obranbu Andrius Kubilius upozorio je da bi Europa trebala biti sposobna brzo rasporediti oko 100.000 vojnika kako bi odgovorila na moguću gomilu ruskih snaga. Iako su milijarde eura namijenjene oružju i vojnoj opremi, problem nedostatka vojnika nije nov – Europski parlament je 2024. upozoren na teškoće u privlačenju i zadržavanju vojnika. Predsjednik Europske organizacije vojnih udruga i sindikata Emmanuel Jacob naglasio je da je potrebno dovoljno ljudi za sve investicije. Istraživanje EUROMIL-a pokazalo je da su plaće i uvjeti rada glavni problemi za privlačenje novih vojnika, dok postojeći pripadnici odlaze zbog niskih primanja i lošeg balansa između privatnog i poslovnog života.

Europe is rapidly increasing its military spending and preparing for potential external threats, but faces a critical challenge that money alone cannot solve, shortages of personnel willing to serve in armed forces. The European Union has accelerated its defense investments, allocating hundreds of billions of euros to prepare its 27 member states for possible external dangers. However, despite these financial commitments, Europe is grappling with a growing issue: a lack of soldiers ready to deploy quickly in response to emerging threats. According to Andrius Kubilius, the European Union’s defense commissioner, Europe must be capable of deploying approximately 100,000 troops very quickly should Russia mass its forces near the borders of NATO and the EU. In a speech earlier this year in Vilnius, Kubilius warned of a hypothetical scenario in which 100,000 Russian troops gather along the EU-NATO border by 2030, a year intelligence agencies believe Russia might be prepared to test NATO. He emphasized that Europe would need to respond swiftly with a similar number of troops and equipment. The problem of insufficient manpower is not new. The European Parliament warned in 2024 that European armed forces face serious difficulties in recruiting new members and retaining existing ones. This issue has become even more pressing due to the ambitious plans to strengthen European defense capabilities. Emmanuel Jacob, president of the European Organisation of Military Unions and Trade Unions (EUROMIL), stressed that ultimately, there must be enough people available to utilize all these investments effectively. A survey conducted by EUROMIL among 11 military unions revealed that most respondents described recruitment in their countries as problematic, while retention of current military personnel was either problematic or critical. The study included military unions from Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden. Results indicated that military personnel often leave service after around ten years. Recruitment challenges include competition from the private sector, low pay, and physical fitness requirements. Retention issues stem from low salaries, poor work-life balance, and overall working conditions. Proposed solutions include higher pay and pensions, better work-life balance, and reduced working hours to make the military more attractive to both new recruits and existing personnel. Steven Everts, director of the European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), warns that Europe must significantly increase the number of reserve forces. Modern armies require not just traditional soldiers but also specialists in cyber security, logistics, medicine, and other fields who could be called upon in times of crisis. A major concern is how to convince private employers to allow their employees to serve in the military when needed. Everts pointed out that if someone works for an IT company, their employer may not have an interest in making them available for national military service when required. He noted that European rearmament efforts so far have not been accompanied by the necessary organizational reforms to support such a system. This issue is not unique to the European Union. NATO is also deeply concerned about the inability of its member states to expand their armed forces according to new demands, which poses a direct risk to the alliance's readiness and credibility. NATO’s Defense and Security Committee is preparing a report on recruitment and retention problems, which is expected to be presented soon.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 96Objective 92yesterday
A race against time: Europe is arming, but there is no one to fight.

The article discusses the European Union's efforts to strengthen defense capabilities ahead of potential Russian aggression, highlighting concerns over the shortage of military personnel despite increased funding and NATO commitments. European Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius emphasizes the need for around 100,000 troops to respond to a possible Russian invasion by 2030. However, experts warn that the lack of manpower poses a significant challenge. Emmanuel Jacob of EUROMIL notes that while investment in defense has increased, there are serious issues with recruiting and retaining soldiers. The European Parliament had previously warned about these challenges, calling for action. Surveys indicate that many soldiers leave service after about ten years due to low pay, poor work-life balance, and other factors. Recommendations include higher salaries, better benefits, and improved working conditions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the issue, citing both the strategic goals of the EU and the practical challenges faced by military recruitment. It includes perspectives from multiple stakeholders including officials, organizations, and expert analyses without overtly favoring any particular

Why factuality (96): The article closely aligns with the primary source, accurately reporting the EU's rearmament plans, the €800 billion investment, the warnings from Andrius Kubilius and Emmanuel Jacob about the need for 100,000 soldiers, and the recruitment and retention challenges highlighted by the European Parliam

Why objectivity (92): The article presents the situation objectively, using neutral language and citing multiple perspectives, including those of EUROMIL, Kubilius, and the European Parliament. It avoids taking sides or injecting personal opinion, maintaining a balanced view of the challenges facing European defense forc

tportal logotportalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 90yesterday
Europe is arming itself out of fear of Russia, but a problem has arisen that money cannot solve

Europska unija ubrzano se naoružava i mobilizira stotine milijardi eura kako bi pripremila svoje 27 članice za moguće vanjske prijetnje, posebno u kontekstu ruskog pritiska na granicama NATO-a i EU-a. Međutim, njeno najveće izazova ostaje nedostatak ljudi spremnih služiti u oružanim snagama. Europski povjerenik za obranbu Andrius Kubilius upozorio je da bi Europa trebala biti sposobna brzo rasporediti oko 100.000 vojnika kako bi odgovorila na moguću gomilu ruskih snaga. Iako su milijarde eura namijenjene oružju i vojnoj opremi, problem nedostatka vojnika nije nov – Europski parlament je 2024. upozoren na teškoće u privlačenju i zadržavanju vojnika. Predsjednik Europske organizacije vojnih udruga i sindikata Emmanuel Jacob naglasio je da je potrebno dovoljno ljudi za sve investicije. Istraživanje EUROMIL-a pokazalo je da su plaće i uvjeti rada glavni problemi za privlačenje novih vojnika, dok postojeći pripadnici odlaze zbog niskih primanja i lošeg balansa između privatnog i poslovnog života.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the European Union's military challenges, including expert opinions from both the European Defence Commissioner and the EUROMIL organization. It does not take a clear ideological stance but rather reports on the structural issues facing the EU’s defense, a

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects the primary source document, including details about the EU's rearmament efforts, the €800 billion plan, the warnings from EUROMIL and Andrius Kubilius about the need for 100,000 soldiers, and the issues with recruitment and retention. It cites the European Parliament

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a largely neutral tone, presenting facts and quotes from various sources without overt bias. It acknowledges both the EU's efforts and the challenges faced. However, the mention of Zoran Milanović at a NATO summit appears out of place and could introduce a slight imbalance if u

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories