ON
← Back to feed
Environmental group hails court decision on orange roughy catch-limit
NZ🏛️ Politicsyesterday

Environmental group hails court decision on orange roughy catch-limit

An environmental group, the Environmental Law Initiative (ELI), has praised a recent High Court ruling that deemed a 2023 decision by former Fisheries Minister Rachel Brooking on orange roughy catch limits unlawful. The court found that Brooking failed to adequately consider environmental protections, specifically the need to safeguard spawning grounds, when setting the total allowable catch (TAC). Justice Cheryl Gwyn ruled that Fisheries New Zealand should have advised Brooking on protecting these critical habitats, which they did not. While the court did not order the decision to be remade, it emphasized that future TAC decisions must incorporate these environmental considerations. Seafood NZ stated the ruling does not impact current operations, while Fisheries Minister Shane Jones noted the court acknowledged additional management actions he has taken since the decision.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

RNZ (Radio New Zealand) logoRNZ (Radio New Zealand)State / PublicCenteryesterday
Environmental group hails court decision on orange roughy catch-limit

An environmental group, the Environmental Law Initiative (ELI), has praised a recent High Court ruling that deemed a 2023 decision by former Fisheries Minister Rachel Brooking on orange roughy catch limits unlawful. The court found that Brooking failed to adequately consider environmental protections, specifically the need to safeguard spawning grounds, when setting the total allowable catch (TAC). Justice Cheryl Gwyn ruled that Fisheries New Zealand should have advised Brooking on protecting these critical habitats, which they did not. While the court did not order the decision to be remade, it emphasized that future TAC decisions must incorporate these environmental considerations. Seafood NZ stated the ruling does not impact current operations, while Fisheries Minister Shane Jones noted the court acknowledged additional management actions he has taken since the decision.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the court's ruling and includes perspectives from both the environmental group and industry representatives, providing balanced coverage without overtly favoring one side. It focuses on legal interpretation and environmental policy rather than partisan critique.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories