Sadí de Buen, the doctor who promoted the largest campaign against malaria in Spain who was shot by Francoism

elDiario.esIndependentProgressive12 hr. ago

On September 2, 1936, Sadí de Buen, a prominent Spanish epidemiologist who led one of the most significant anti-malaria campaigns in Spain during the early 20th century, was executed by firing squad in Córdoba along with nine others. De Buen had been working to eradicate malaria through scientific methods such as strict epidemiological control, free distribution of quinine, and public education, supported by international aid including the Rockefeller Foundation. His efforts nearly eliminated the disease before the Spanish Civil War disrupted progress. De Buen was targeted due to his Republican and leftist affiliations, and he was executed without trial. He came from a family of intellectuals and scientists, many of whom were later exiled or died abroad. His work laid the foundation for modern public health initiatives in Spain.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights the execution of a progressive public health figure under Franco’s regime, emphasizing the repression of leftist and Republican individuals. It frames the event within the broader context of political persecution during the Spanish Civil War, using terms like 'fusilable' and '

infoLibreIndependentProgressive2 days ago

The article recounts personal experiences from the aftermath of the Spanish Civil War and the subsequent Franco regime, focusing on the hardships faced by a family during this period. The narrator describes their mother’s early life under oppressive conditions, including the loss of several siblings, the imprisonment of their grandfather, and the extreme poverty that forced the family to rely on charity and scavenging for survival. The narrative highlights the severe food shortages and the desperate measures taken to keep children alive, such as relying on raw meat and the emotional toll of constant hunger. It concludes with a reference to the lasting trauma caused by the 1936 coup and its impact on the family.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the suffering of the family as a direct consequence of the political upheaval and authoritarian policies, particularly those of the Franco regime. While it does not overtly criticize specific political figures, the emphasis on the human cost of the regime's actions aligns with a左翼