Immigrant seeks to pay $368,000 in fines but faces obstacles due to a flawed payment system. Daniel, an immigrant who entered the U.S. on a legal tourist visa around two decades ago, initially sought asylum after fleeing his home country in South America. However, a court denied his asylum application. Eleven years ago, he married a U.S. citizen, and together they had two children who are also U.S. citizens. The couple attempted to secure legal status for Daniel through their marriage, but he was issued a deportation order, complicating their case. Daniel recently received a letter from the government stating he owes approximately $368,000 in fines. According to his attorney, this figure stems from an executive order issued by former President Donald Trump, which updated the daily fine from $500 to $998 for individuals who willfully fail or refuse to leave after receiving a removal order. This policy led to fines reaching up to $1.8 million for those who remained in the U.S. for the maximum five-year period. By July, over 100,000 immigrants had received notices of fines, accumulating over $84 million in total penalties. Despite Daniel's eagerness to pay, he faces significant challenges. The government has not provided him with the necessary information to make a payment. The letter he received contained a blank field where an identification number for the online payment system should have been. Attempts to use his Social Security number or alien number to access the payment portal were unsuccessful. His wife contacted customer service, but the call disconnected after an extended wait. Daniel's situation reflects a broader issue faced by many immigrants. Attorney Melanie Zamenhof from the New York Legal Response Team at Neighbors Link noted that none of her clients have successfully paid the fines imposed by the administration. The letters sent to immigrants are typically brief, lacking explanations of how the fines were calculated, whether interest has been applied, or when the fines began accruing. Recipients are given only 15 business days to contest the fines, yet many received the notices after this deadline had passed. The complexity of the payment process has left many immigrants confused and frustrated. Zamenhof emphasized the need for clear communication and transparency regarding the fines. She highlighted that without proper guidance, immigrants are unable to navigate the system effectively. The lack of accessible information and support exacerbates the difficulties faced by individuals trying to comply with the regulations. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has pursued various strategies to enforce immigration laws. In Liberia, the government agreed to accept up to 1,200 third-country deportees from the U.S. within a year. This arrangement is part of a larger effort to deport individuals who have violated immigration laws. Former acting ICE director Jonathan Fahey discussed plans to identify and encourage Haitian migrants whose Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is expiring to leave the U.S. voluntarily before enforcement actions commence. Liberia's President Joseph Boakai, along with other West African leaders, met with President Trump last year to discuss these arrangements. The Liberian government stated that the deportees would be treated as guests and could apply for asylum upon arrival. The country aims to provide support to ensure the safety and well-being of those arriving. However, the specifics of the agreement remain unclear, particularly regarding whether any of the deportees have protections against return due to potential risks in their home countries. In another development, an Obama-appointed judge deferred to a Supreme Court ruling, clearing the way for the Trump administration to end TPS protections for thousands of Somali nationals. Judge Allison Burroughs lifted a previous stay that had blocked the termination of Somalia's TPS designation. The Supreme Court's decision in Mullin v. Doe limited the ability of lower courts to review the administration's decisions regarding TPS designations. This ruling allows the Trump administration to proceed with ending TPS for Somalia, potentially leading to the deportation of thousands of affected migrants who lack alternative legal status in the U.S. Plaintiffs in the case argued that the administration's decision was driven by bias against non-white immigrants, referencing past derogatory remarks by Trump about Somalis. Despite these concerns, the judge cited the Supreme Court's ruling and lifted the stay, permitting the administration to move forward with its plans.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
United States
