ON
← Back to feed
Fraud of the Constitution from beginning to end
Spain🏛️ PoliticsCenter14 days ago

Fraud of the Constitution from beginning to end

The article discusses allegations of constitutional manipulation by the Spanish People's Party (PP), led by Alberto Núñez Feijóo, during the 2023 general election process. It claims that the PP attempted to challenge the legitimacy of Pedro Sánchez’s election as prime minister by pressuring King Felipe VI to propose Feijóo as the candidate, despite lacking parliamentary support. The piece contrasts this with the 2016 situation where former Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy declined a royal proposal, effectively halting the legislative process. The article argues that the PP’s actions in 2023 involved an unprecedented interpretation of Article 99 of the Constitution to undermine Sánchez’s investiture, focusing on issues like amnesty laws rather than governance. It criticizes the PP for allegedly operating outside constitutional boundaries while refusing to use legal tools like a motion of censure.

The Spanish opposition party Popular Party (PP) has called on the central government to reverse its decision to exclude Galicia from the national high-speed rail network expansion plan. In a non-binding parliamentary proposal, the PP's regional group in Galicia argued that the move represents a new injustice toward Galician infrastructure and risks isolating much of the region’s railway system from European standards. The PP accused the ruling Socialist government under Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez of undermining Galicia’s integration into the Atlantic Corridor, a key trans-European transport route. The controversy centers around the state’s strategic plan for expanding high-speed rail lines, which aims to connect Spain with international networks through the Atlantic Corridor. Galicia, a western region of Spain, has long sought inclusion in this project to improve connectivity with Portugal and other European countries. However, the current government has opted not to include Galicia in the initial phase of the plan, citing technical and financial considerations. This decision has drawn sharp criticism from the PP, which claims it disregards the region’s economic and logistical needs. The PP’s demand comes amid broader tensions between the ruling Socialists and the opposition over infrastructure priorities and regional representation. The PP argues that excluding Galicia weakens the region’s ability to compete economically and integrate fully into Europe’s transport systems. It also highlights concerns about the aging and less modernized parts of Galicia’s rail network, which could fall further behind if not upgraded alongside the rest of Spain. The dispute reflects deeper political divisions within Spain, particularly following the recent general elections. The PP had hoped to form a government after the July 23 election results, but failed to secure enough support to challenge Sánchez’s Socialist-led coalition. Since then, the PP has been vocal about perceived injustices in policy decisions affecting regions under its traditional influence, such as Galicia. The PP’s criticism of the government extends beyond infrastructure issues. Earlier reports suggested that the PP has been challenging the constitutional process surrounding the formation of the current government. According to some accounts, the PP leader, Alberto Núñez Feijóo, pushed the king to propose him as prime minister despite knowing that Sánchez had secured a majority in parliament. This maneuver was seen as an attempt to circumvent established constitutional norms, which previously dictated that the monarch would nominate a candidate who had parliamentary backing. Feijóo’s approach marked a departure from past conventions, where the monarchy typically followed the will of the legislature. In 2016, former PM Mariano Rajoy declined the king’s nomination, effectively halting the investment process until Sánchez eventually formed his government. Now, Feijóo is reportedly seeking to reinterpret Article 99 of the Constitution to justify his claim to leadership, even though he lacks the necessary parliamentary support. This constitutional maneuvering has raised questions about the role of the Senate in Spain’s political landscape. The PP has attempted to shift responsibility onto the Senate, arguing that it should play a more active role in shaping legislation and holding the government accountable. However, critics argue that these efforts contradict the Constitution, which clearly assigns the primary role of overseeing executive actions to the Congress of Deputies. Despite these challenges, the PP continues to push for changes in both infrastructure planning and constitutional interpretation. Its latest demand regarding Galicia underscores the ongoing struggle between regional interests and national priorities, as well as the broader political conflict between the ruling Socialists and their main opposition. The outcome of these disputes will likely shape Spain’s future policies and the balance of power among its regions.

2 reports

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 6014 days ago
Fraud of the Constitution from beginning to end

The article discusses allegations of constitutional manipulation by the Spanish People's Party (PP), led by Alberto Núñez Feijóo, during the 2023 general election process. It claims that the PP attempted to challenge the legitimacy of Pedro Sánchez’s election as prime minister by pressuring King Felipe VI to propose Feijóo as the candidate, despite lacking parliamentary support. The piece contrasts this with the 2016 situation where former Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy declined a royal proposal, effectively halting the legislative process. The article argues that the PP’s actions in 2023 involved an unprecedented interpretation of Article 99 of the Constitution to undermine Sánchez’s investiture, focusing on issues like amnesty laws rather than governance. It criticizes the PP for allegedly operating outside constitutional boundaries while refusing to use legal tools like a motion of censure.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the PP's actions as unconstitutional and fraudulent, emphasizing their attempts to manipulate the constitutional framework to maintain power. It portrays the PP as acting against democratic norms and highlights the contrast with the more legally compliant approach of Pedro Sánchez

Why factuality (75): The article discusses political maneuvering by the PP and references constitutional procedures, but lacks specific dates or official documents to verify claims about Feijóo manipulating the Constitution. It aligns with broader narratives about Spanish political conflicts but does not provide indepen

Why objectivity (60): The tone suggests a critical stance toward the PP and Pedro Sánchez, using terms like 'fraude' and implying deliberate obstruction. The narrative appears to favor one political perspective over another, lacking neutrality.

ABC (España) logoABC (España)IndependentConservativeFactual 65Objective 5514 days ago
PP calls on the Government to rectify its decision to exclude Galicia from the state plan for an international railway

The Spanish regional conservative party, the People's Party (PP), has called on the central government to reverse its decision to exclude Galicia from the national plan for international rail gauge migration. The PP argues this exclusion constitutes a new affront by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s administration against Galician infrastructure, which they claim jeopardizes the region's integration into the Atlantic Corridor and risks leaving much of its railway network behind outdated European standards. The PP plans to submit a non-binding proposal to address this issue, emphasizing the need for immediate inclusion of Galicia in the planned Corredor Atlántico.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the exclusion of Galicia as a deliberate 'new affront' by the ruling government, using emotionally charged language such as 'agravio' and 'condena,' which implies a negative political judgment. The focus on criticizing the current administration and advocating for Galician rights,

Why factuality (65): The article reports on a political request from the PP regarding infrastructure planning in Galicia, citing a proposed law. However, it does not include direct quotes or official statements from the government, making it difficult to assess the factual basis of the claim that this is a new 'agravio'

Why objectivity (55): The language used ('nuevo agravio', 'condena') carries a negative tone towards the government, suggesting bias rather than presenting both sides equally. The focus on the PP's position without counterbalance reduces objectivity.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories