ON
← Back to feed
infoLibre logo🏛️ Politics
Spain🏛️ PoliticsCenter8/31/2026

The advance of 'Plus Ultra', the trials of 'Lezo' or the ruling of 'Kitchen' will mark the judicial course in an election year

The new judicial term in Spain begins on September 2nd at the Supreme Court, expected to be as intense as the previous one, with numerous high-profile cases impacting politics during an election year. The case of 'Plus Ultra,' involving former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, is set to resume, with investigations into his alleged involvement in the rescue of a airline and receipt of public funds. The court has requested exhaustive reports on the airline's ownership and allowed access to bank accounts, including those of Zapatero and his family. The case also awaits explanations regarding valuable items found during searches, which led to charges of smuggling and financial crimes. Another major case, 'Leire Díez,' involves allegations of a scheme led by former Socialist Party secretary Santos Cerdán, affecting party funds.

The new judicial term has intensified pressure on Spain’s ruling Socialist Party (PSOE) with ongoing legal cases involving former leaders and prominent figures. The 2026–2027 judicial period begins much like its predecessor, focusing heavily on high-profile cases linked to the party. Among them is José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, the former leader of the PSOE and former Prime Minister. Also under scrutiny are Begoña Gómez, wife of current Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, and Santos Cerdán, the former secretary of organization within the PSOE. Additionally, Leire Díez, a former member of the party's central committee, faces charges related to corruption. Beyond the PSOE, attention will also center on key members of the previous conservative Popular Party (PP) government, including the interior ministry leadership under Mariano Rajoy, led by Jorge Fernández Díaz, who awaits the verdict in the Kitchen case. The Pujol family, whose wealth origins are being investigated by the National Court, and leaders of the independence movement, who await the application of the amnesty law following approval by the European Court of Justice, will also see developments. The judicial calendar includes several major cases that have drawn public and political interest. One of these is the trial related to the “Lezo” affair, which involves allegations of corruption and misuse of public funds. Another key point is the pending judgment in the Kitchen case, which concerns the handling of confidential information by officials during the Rajoy administration. The investigation into Zapatero continues, with prosecutors examining potential violations of the Organic Law on Public Administrations. These cases are part of broader efforts to hold individuals accountable for alleged misconduct, reflecting a trend of increased judicial oversight in Spanish politics. The involvement of high-ranking politicians in legal proceedings underscores the growing role of the judiciary in shaping political outcomes. For the PSOE, these cases represent both a challenge and an opportunity to demonstrate transparency and accountability. The party has faced criticism over past governance, and the legal actions against its members could influence public perception of its integrity. Meanwhile, the PP, which previously held power, is also under scrutiny, highlighting how legal processes can affect the balance of political influence. The legal landscape is further complicated by the ongoing investigations into the Pujol family, whose financial activities have raised questions about the legality of their assets. The National Court is expected to deliver a decision on whether their fortune was acquired through illicit means. This case has become emblematic of broader concerns about economic inequality and the need for greater transparency in wealth accumulation among political elites. Similarly, the leaders of the independence movement remain in limbo, awaiting the outcome of their appeal regarding the amnesty law, which could determine whether they face criminal charges or receive leniency. Public reaction to these developments has been mixed. Some citizens view the legal actions as necessary steps toward justice and accountability, while others argue that the courts are being used as a tool to target specific political groups. Legal experts note that the concentration of high-profile cases in one judicial term reflects a strategic effort to address long-standing controversies. However, critics warn that such focus could lead to politicization of the judiciary, undermining its impartiality. Looking ahead, the coming months will likely bring more rulings and decisions that could reshape the political landscape. The outcomes of these cases may influence future elections, policy directions, and the overall stability of Spain’s democratic institutions. As the judicial process unfolds, the interplay between law and politics will continue to be a defining feature of the nation’s recent history.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

infoLibre logoinfoLibreIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 828/31/2026
The advance of 'Plus Ultra', the trials of 'Lezo' or the ruling of 'Kitchen' will mark the judicial course in an election year

The new judicial term in Spain begins on September 2nd at the Supreme Court, expected to be as intense as the previous one, with numerous high-profile cases impacting politics during an election year. The case of 'Plus Ultra,' involving former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, is set to resume, with investigations into his alleged involvement in the rescue of a airline and receipt of public funds. The court has requested exhaustive reports on the airline's ownership and allowed access to bank accounts, including those of Zapatero and his family. The case also awaits explanations regarding valuable items found during searches, which led to charges of smuggling and financial crimes. Another major case, 'Leire Díez,' involves allegations of a scheme led by former Socialist Party secretary Santos Cerdán, affecting party funds.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of multiple politically sensitive cases without overtly favoring any side. It describes both the legal proceedings and their potential political implications without taking a clear ideological stance. While the cases involve prominent political figures, the报道

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about upcoming legal cases, including references to specific individuals like José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and mentions specific legal procedures such as the investigation into 'Plus Ultra'. It aligns with the general consensus among sources about the intens

Why objectivity (82): The article presents the legal developments in a neutral manner, discussing both government and opposition figures without overt bias. The tone remains informative rather than emotionally charged, though there is some emphasis on the political implications of the legal cases.

Público logoPúblicoIndependentCenterFactual 84Objective 838/29/2026
The first trials for 'Lezo', the ruling of 'Kitchen', the investigation against Zapatero and seven other milestones that will mark the new judicial course

The article highlights several significant legal developments expected in the new judicial year, including the first trials related to the 'Lezo' case, the ruling on the 'Kitchen' case, and an investigation into former Prime Minister Zapatero. It lists seven key judicial milestones that could shape the upcoming period, focusing on high-profile cases involving political figures and legal controversies. The piece serves as an overview of anticipated legal actions rather than providing detailed analysis or commentary.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of multiple legal cases without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It focuses on reporting the existence and significance of these judicial milestones rather than taking a clear ideological position on them. While some cases involve prominent政治

Why factuality (84): This article lists several legal events expected in the new judicial term, including references to 'Lezo', 'Kitchen', and the investigation against Zapatero. It matches the broader narrative found in other sources regarding the significance of these cases. While no primary source is provided, the co

Why objectivity (83): The article maintains a balanced approach by listing various legal events without taking sides. The language is straightforward and focuses on reporting the facts without injecting personal opinion or emotional weight.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories