ON
← Back to feed
The world against Infantino: the greatest work of self-destruction after "cutting himself"
AR🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

The world against Infantino: the greatest work of self-destruction after "cutting himself"

The article discusses the fallout surrounding Gianni Infantino, president of FIFA, following controversies related to his decisions during the 2026 World Cup. Fans in Switzerland displayed protest signs against him, calling him 'mafia of football' after he was perceived as having lost support globally. The piece highlights how Infantino's decision to sell 20% of World Cup broadcasting rights for $20 billion was seen as a major misstep, especially considering the financial challenges faced by the U.S.-hosted tournament. It suggests that Infantino may have been overly influenced by figures like Donald Trump and failed to consider the broader implications of such a deal. The article questions whether Infantino's approach was driven by personal ambition rather than the best interests of football, noting that even close collaborators believe he made the decision independently without sufficient debate.

The world has turned its back on Gianni Infantino, with fans in Switzerland publicly denouncing him as part of a "mafia of football." A provocative sign reading "¡Fuck off Infantino!" was displayed by supporters of Lausana during a match against Basel, marking a dramatic shift in public perception. Once hailed as the architect of a successful World Cup expansion, Infantino’s reputation has crumbled rapidly. His ambitious plans for expanding the World Cup to include 64 teams were met with skepticism, and his recent decisions have led to widespread criticism. Infantino's downfall began with his controversial decision to sell a 20% stake in the World Cup broadcasting rights for $20 billion. This move came after the 2026 World Cup in the United States generated only around $13 billion in revenue. Critics argue that this deal undermined the FIFA’s financial stability and sovereignty. The sale was reportedly influenced by discussions with wealthy individuals, including figures associated with former U.S. President Donald Trump. Trump had previously supported Infantino’s efforts to lift sanctions against American player Folarin Balogun, which further fueled controversy. Infantino’s actions have sparked legal threats from European officials, who accuse him of arrogance and mismanagement. Folarin Balogun, whose case led to significant backlash, has threatened legal action against Infantino and Joshua Kushner, the partner behind the investment deal. Europe, particularly the European Union, has expressed concerns over the influence of powerful political allies, such as Trump, on FIFA’s governance. In response to mounting pressure, Infantino called an emergency meeting of his Council. The meeting aims to address internal dissent and reassess the organization’s direction. However, many believe that the damage has already been done. The International Football Association Board (IFAB) and other governing bodies are under scrutiny for their role in approving the controversial deals. The situation has also raised questions about the future of FIFA’s leadership. With upcoming elections set for March 18th in Rabat, there is growing speculation about whether Infantino will remain in power. Some analysts suggest that securing enough votes, currently estimated at around 106, will be challenging given the current climate of distrust. The election outcome could mark a turning point for FIFA, potentially leading to a new era of governance. Meanwhile, Infantino continues to maintain close ties with political figures, including Colombia’s newly elected president, Abelardo de la Espriella, who is aligned with Trump’s policies. This alliance underscores the complex interplay between sports and politics within FIFA. Despite these connections, the organization faces increasing demands for transparency and accountability. As the situation unfolds, the focus remains on how FIFA will navigate its challenges. The coming weeks will likely determine whether Infantino can recover from his recent controversies or if he will step down, paving the way for a new leader. The international football community watches closely, hoping for a resolution that prioritizes fairness and integrity over personal ambition.

1 reports

La Nación logoLa NaciónIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 95Objective 72yesterday
The world against Infantino: the greatest work of self-destruction after "cutting himself"

The article discusses the fallout surrounding Gianni Infantino, president of FIFA, following controversies related to his decisions during the 2026 World Cup. Fans in Switzerland displayed protest signs against him, calling him 'mafia of football' after he was perceived as having lost support globally. The piece highlights how Infantino's decision to sell 20% of World Cup broadcasting rights for $20 billion was seen as a major misstep, especially considering the financial challenges faced by the U.S.-hosted tournament. It suggests that Infantino may have been overly influenced by figures like Donald Trump and failed to consider the broader implications of such a deal. The article questions whether Infantino's approach was driven by personal ambition rather than the best interests of football, noting that even close collaborators believe he made the decision independently without sufficient debate.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Infantino's actions as politically motivated and self-serving, suggesting he was influenced by right-wing figures like Trump and failed to prioritize the integrity of football over personal gain. The tone implies criticism of his leadership style and potential conflicts ofinterest

Why factuality (95): The article reports on public backlash against Gianni Infantino following controversies related to World Cup commercialization and political connections. It references specific events such as the display of a protest sign by fans in Switzerland, the FIFA denying Infantino’s search for U.S. support,

Why objectivity (72): The article presents a strong narrative of Infantino’s downfall, using emotionally charged language like 'máfia del fútbol' and 'hoguera de las vanidades.' While it provides factual background, the tone leans toward criticism of Infantino and his associates, particularly linking him to Trump. This s

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories