ON
← Back to feed
Earth's end may not be what we thought: what would be the new deadline for life
AR🏛️ PoliticsCenter19 days ago

Earth's end may not be what we thought: what would be the new deadline for life

Un nuevo estudio científico revisa la teoría tradicional sobre el fin de la vida en la Tierra, sugiriendo que la Tierra podría mantener organismos fotosintéticos durante alrededor de 1860 millones de años, un periodo mayor al calculado anteriormente. El estudio, publicado en 'Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres', utiliza un modelo climático avanzado llamado ExoCAM que considera factores como la formación de nubes y el ciclo hidrológico. Los investigadores proponen que la supervivencia de la biosfera depende tanto del calentamiento progresivo del Sol como de los procesos que regulan el carbono atmosférico. Dos escenarios principales son analizados: uno donde la vegetación se extingue debido al aumento de la luz solar y otro donde el ciclo del carbono actúa como un contrapeso. Algunas especies, como las plantas con metabolismo CAM, podrían sobrevivir a niveles muy bajos de CO₂. La combinación de estos factores lleva a una fecha promedio de 1860 millones de años para el colapso de la biosfera, coincidiendo con la evaporación de los océanos.

Scientists have revised their understanding of when life on Earth might end, suggesting that the planet could sustain photosynthetic organisms for up to 1,860 million years, far longer than previously thought. This new estimate challenges earlier assumptions that the increasing brightness of the Sun would directly lead to the extinction of terrestrial life. The updated findings, published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, were based on advanced climate modeling that incorporated complex factors such as cloud formation and hydrological cycles, which had been overlooked in simpler models. The study used a three-dimensional climate model called ExoCAM to simulate how the Earth’s biosphere might respond over time to the rising energy input from the Sun. Unlike previous studies, this approach considered the long-term carbon cycle and its role in regulating atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases. Researchers found that the survival of photosynthetic life depends not just on the gradual warming caused by the Sun’s increased output, but also on how effectively the Earth can remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through geological processes. Two main scenarios were proposed to explain when the biosphere might collapse. One scenario suggests that the increasing solar radiation will eventually make conditions too harsh for plants to survive, while another considers the possibility that certain species with adaptive traits could persist even under extreme environmental stress. According to the researchers, some current plant species, particularly those with specialized metabolic strategies, may be able to thrive even when atmospheric carbon dioxide levels drop to one part per million, a far lower concentration than previously assumed. Plants using the Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM), such as cacti, are capable of surviving in arid environments by opening their stomata at night to minimize water loss. These mechanisms allow them to fix carbon more efficiently under low CO₂ conditions. Similarly, aquatic organisms and certain land-based species possess biological adaptations that could enable them to endure prolonged periods of resource scarcity. When both scenarios were combined, the study estimated that the average lifespan of Earth's biosphere would extend to approximately 1,860 million years. At this point, ocean evaporation would begin due to sustained heating from the Sun, leading to the disappearance of surface water. Without liquid oceans, the planet would become increasingly inhospitable to life dependent on water, evolving into a state similar to that of Venus, where surface temperatures are extreme and water exists primarily in gaseous form. The research highlights the dynamic interaction between solar radiation, atmospheric composition, and biological adaptation. While the Sun’s increasing brightness is the ultimate driver of these changes, the outcome will depend on how well the Earth’s systems can regulate temperature and maintain habitable conditions. Scientists emphasized that Earth’s biosphere has shown resilience throughout its history, and current observations may not fully capture the potential for future evolutionary responses. The study concludes that the end of terrestrial vegetation might align with the complete evaporation of the oceans, marking a dramatic shift in planetary conditions. As the Sun continues to grow brighter, the balance between natural regulatory processes and environmental extremes will determine whether life on Earth can continue to evolve and adapt.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

La Nación logoLa NaciónIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 8019 days ago
Earth's end may not be what we thought: what would be the new deadline for life

Un nuevo estudio científico revisa la teoría tradicional sobre el fin de la vida en la Tierra, sugiriendo que la Tierra podría mantener organismos fotosintéticos durante alrededor de 1860 millones de años, un periodo mayor al calculado anteriormente. El estudio, publicado en 'Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres', utiliza un modelo climático avanzado llamado ExoCAM que considera factores como la formación de nubes y el ciclo hidrológico. Los investigadores proponen que la supervivencia de la biosfera depende tanto del calentamiento progresivo del Sol como de los procesos que regulan el carbono atmosférico. Dos escenarios principales son analizados: uno donde la vegetación se extingue debido al aumento de la luz solar y otro donde el ciclo del carbono actúa como un contrapeso. Algunas especies, como las plantas con metabolismo CAM, podrían sobrevivir a niveles muy bajos de CO₂. La combinación de estos factores lleva a una fecha promedio de 1860 millones de años para el colapso de la biosfera, coincidiendo con la evaporación de los océanos.

Bias read (Center): El artículo presenta un análisis científico objetivo sobre el futuro de la Tierra, sin tomar partido político ni ideológico. Se basa en datos empíricos y en estudios científicos, manteniendo un equilibrio entre diferentes escenarios posibles. No hay evidencia de sesgo ideológico o preferencia por un

Why factuality (75): The article reports on a scientific study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres using a 3D climate model called ExoCAM. It accurately describes the study’s findings regarding the extended timeframe for photosynthetic organisms and the factors influencing this estimate. The in

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the scientific findings in a neutral manner, explaining both scenarios proposed by the researchers without apparent bias. It uses descriptive language but avoids emotionally charged terms or overt advocacy, maintaining a balanced perspective.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories