Strong fall in Milei's approval and defeat in a ballotage with Kicillof
The article reports on declining approval ratings for Argentine President Javier Milei and his potential defeat in a hypothetical runoff against Governor Axel Kicillof. According to data from the Observatory of Applied Social Psychology (OPSA) at the University of Buenos Aires, Milei's disapproval rate reached 62.8%, while 37.2% approve of his administration. Among those who voted for Milei in the 2023 runoff, 33.6% now disapprove. The report indicates strong public demand for change, with 64.1% preferring a new government. Opposition preferences favor a Kirchnerist government (39.7%) over non-Kirchnerist Peronism (26.9%), independent options (23.8%), and a return of the PRO/Macri coalition (9.6%). In a simulated head-to-head between Milei and Kicillof, Kicillof would win with 48.2% compared to Milei’s 39.3%. Public concerns include low wages (63.1%), corruption (62.8%), judicial inefficiency (54.5%), unemployment (54.2%), government austerity measures (49.6%), and poverty (46.0%).
Javier Milei's approval rating has plummeted significantly, marking his worst public standing since taking office under the libertarian administration. According to the latest Monitor Sociopolítico y Electoral report from the University of Buenos Aires' Faculty of Psychology, there is a clear convergence of three warning indicators for the national government: a majority disapproval of the administration, widespread calls for political change, and an unfavorable outcome in a hypothetical second-round election against Governor Axel Kicillof. The survey, based on a sample of 2,184 cases, reveals that disapproval of Milei’s governance stands at 62.8%, with only 37.2% expressing approval. This decline extends even among his core supporters, with 33.6% of those who voted for him in the 2023 runoff now disapproving of his leadership. The report projects that political demands for change will likely dominate the upcoming 2027 presidential elections. A striking 64.1% of respondents prefer a new government, contrasting sharply with the 35.9% who support continuity. Among those seeking change, the preferred alternatives include a return to the kirchnerist model (39.7%), a non-kirchnerist Peronism (26.9%), independent or other-party options (23.8%), and a potential comeback for the PRO/macro movement (9.6%). In terms of current voter intent, Libertad Avanza leads with 32.0%, followed by kirchnerist Peronism (24.5%), non-kirchnerist Peronism (13.4%), the Left United Front (9.9%), the PRO (6.6%), and 6.9% undecided voters. In a hypothetical head-to-head matchup between Milei and Kicillof, the opposition leader would secure 48.2% of the votes compared to Milei’s 39.3%. An additional 12.0% of respondents indicate they would not choose either candidate. These figures underscore a growing perception that Milei’s administration lacks both legitimacy and effectiveness in addressing pressing national concerns. National concerns have shifted from inflation to broader socioeconomic issues, with low wages and corruption emerging as primary worries. Respondents cited low salaries (63.1%) and corruption (62.8%) as their top concerns, followed by judicial efficiency (54.5%), unemployment (54.2%), government austerity measures (49.6%), and poverty (46.0%). Inflation, once a central issue, has dropped to 27.7% in mentions. The analysis highlights how media attention on high-profile scandals within the ruling party has eroded the symbolic value of Milei’s promise to offer an ethical alternative to the "establishment." There is also a notable gap between collective pessimism and individual economic assessment. While 60.6% of respondents rate the country’s overall economic situation as poor or very poor, only 46.9% view their personal or family finances negatively, with 31.4% reporting a positive outlook. This discrepancy suggests that many citizens perceive a misaligned trajectory for the nation, irrespective of their ability to manage personal financial challenges. Economic policy remains the main challenge for Milei ahead of the 2027 elections. Discontent among sectors tied to commerce, construction, and industry aligns with broader societal frustration over stagnant wages and rising debt levels. A recent survey by the University of San Andrés found that only 29% of respondents expressed satisfaction with the current state of affairs, while 35% held a favorable view of Milei. This mirrors the approval ratings of former president Mauricio Macri during his third year in office. Political analysts suggest that a segment of the electorate, estimated at 40%, might be open to voting for candidates outside the extremes represented by the kirchnerists and Libertad Avanza. This vacuum could potentially be filled by figures such as Dante Guebel, Jorge Brito, and Daniel Hadad, who advocate for moderate economic adjustments without abandoning macroeconomic principles. Mauricio Macri’s meeting with Karina Milei represents the official response to the emergence of the PRO as a political force, with Hernán Lacunza as its presidential candidate. Though Macri does not anticipate much from this engagement, he finds it satisfying as it confirms his earlier prediction regarding the difficulties Milei would face without adequate alliances. Macri attributes part of his success to the political acumen of Federico Sturzenegger, one of Milei’s influential economic ministers. Lacunza’s involvement helps stabilize the political landscape, particularly in Buenos Aires and surrounding provinces, where local leaders seek to avoid future electoral challenges posed by libertarian candidates. The political dynamics continue to evolve, with ongoing negotiations and strategic moves shaping the path toward the 2027 elections. As these developments unfold, the focus remains on economic stability, public trust, and the ability of political actors to address the deepening discontent among the populace.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The article reports on declining approval ratings for Argentine President Javier Milei and his potential defeat in a hypothetical runoff against Governor Axel Kicillof. According to data from the Observatory of Applied Social Psychology (OPSA) at the University of Buenos Aires, Milei's disapproval rate reached 62.8%, while 37.2% approve of his administration. Among those who voted for Milei in the 2023 runoff, 33.6% now disapprove. The report indicates strong public demand for change, with 64.1% preferring a new government. Opposition preferences favor a Kirchnerist government (39.7%) over non-Kirchnerist Peronism (26.9%), independent options (23.8%), and a return of the PRO/Macri coalition (9.6%). In a simulated head-to-head between Milei and Kicillof, Kicillof would win with 48.2% compared to Milei’s 39.3%. Public concerns include low wages (63.1%), corruption (62.8%), judicial inefficiency (54.5%), unemployment (54.2%), government austerity measures (49.6%), and poverty (46.0%).
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the decline in Milei's approval as part of a broader trend toward political change, emphasizing opposition figures like Kicillof and aligning with leftist narratives by highlighting issues such as corruption, inequality, and public dissatisfaction with economic policies. It also c
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a survey conducted by the OPSA from UBA, citing specific percentages of approval/disapproval and projections for 2027 elections. It aligns with the cross-source consensus among the articles, though it does not provide direct quotes or detailed methodology. The data is presente
Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat critical of Milei’s administration, using terms like 'momento más adverso' and 'desgaste del núcleo identitario,' which carry a negative connotation. While the information is factual, the framing leans towards portraying the government in a less favorable light.
La NaciónIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 7010 days ago
The article discusses Javier Milei's economic program as the main challenge in the upcoming elections, highlighting concerns among productive sectors and society over unemployment and low wages. It notes that nearly six million people are in arrears due to loans for daily expenses, with only 29% expressing satisfaction with current conditions according to a survey by the University of San Andrés. Milei's approval rating stands at 35%, similar to former president Mauricio Macri's approval during his third year in office. The article mentions speculation about voters seeking alternatives outside of leftist parties and La Libertad Avanza, suggesting potential candidates like Dante Guebel, Jorge Brito, and Daniel Hadad could fill this gap. It also covers political reactions, including Macri's meeting with Karina Milei and the role of economist Hernán Lacunza in managing alliances and reducing anxiety among regional leaders.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the political landscape, discussing both Milei's challenges and the responses from other political figures like Macri. While it highlights Milei's economic focus and voter dissatisfaction, it does not overtly favor any particular political ideology. The tone,措
Why factuality (80): The article discusses economic concerns and public opinion based on a survey by the University of San Andrés. It references specific percentages and compares Milei’s approval rating to Macri’s, which adds contextual value. However, it includes some speculative commentary about potential candidates a
Why objectivity (70): The article has a more political tone, discussing potential candidates and political strategies. It uses phrases like 'vacío que se pretende cubrir' which suggest a particular narrative about political dynamics rather than presenting an impartial analysis.
Página/12Party-alignedProgressiveFactual 60Objective 5510 days ago
Marcela Pagano, a prominent figure in Argentine politics, has called for prison for Javier Milei, a controversial politician known for his libertarian views. She has also demanded a review of laws passed in exchange for financial benefits. This statement comes amid ongoing debates over political integrity and corruption in Argentina.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Marcela Pagano’s call for prison as a demand for justice against a politically polarizing figure, suggesting a critical stance toward Milei's policies and actions. The emphasis on reviewing laws passed in exchange for money implies a focus on anti-corruption and accountability, a左
Why factuality (60): This article appears to be incomplete or poorly structured, as it only mentions Marcela Pagano requesting jail for Milei and demands to review laws voted for money, without providing full context or supporting details. There is no clear connection to the main event discussed in the other articles, m
Why objectivity (55): The language is highly charged and lacks neutrality. Phrases like 'pidió cárcel' indicate strong political bias and emotional tone, suggesting a partisan perspective rather than objective reporting.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
AR
