ON
← Back to feed
María Corina Machado will not be an "obstacle" to the negotiations forced by Washington between Chavismo 3.0 and a part of the opposition
Spain🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 days ago

María Corina Machado will not be an "obstacle" to the negotiations forced by Washington between Chavismo 3.0 and a part of the opposition

The Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado has endorsed negotiations aimed at establishing a democratic transition and free elections, supported by former President Edmundo González Urrutia. The talks, initiated by the United States after the capture of Nicolás Maduro, aim to create new institutions such as the National Election Council (CNE) and Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ) outside the control of 'Chavismo 3.0'. The two leaders emphasized they would not hinder initiatives producing tangible results, including restoring democratic institutions, releasing political prisoners, and ensuring electoral sovereignty. The initiative, led by the US Department of State, excludes Machado despite her leadership role in the opposition's Panamá Manifesto. Both leaders expressed commitment to returning to Venezuela to support the people and build a national agreement for reconstruction.

On August 1, 2026, Venezuela launched its eighth negotiation process since the rise of the chavist movement 27 years ago. This time, however, there is no international mediator, unlike previous talks such as those mediated by Norway before the disputed 2024 presidential elections. Instead, the United States has taken full control over the terms of the dialogue, deciding who participates, where the meetings take place, what topics will be discussed, and how long they will last. The initiative comes amid a complex political and humanitarian crisis, marked by a U.S. military strike in January that killed more than 100 people and led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro. Since then, Washington has exerted influence over the Venezuelan government, particularly controlling oil production, while a double earthquake in June added more than 5,500 deaths and left nearly 18,000 people homeless. The opposition delegation is led by Dinorah Figuera, a surgeon and member of the opposition party Primero Justicia, who has been based in Madrid since 2023. She heads the National Assembly of 2015, which was elected with a large majority in 2015 but gradually stripped of power by the chavist regime. This assembly once supported the "interim government" of Juan Guaidó, recognized by around 50 countries including Spain, but the opposition later abandoned this effort. Today, Figuera leads a body without territorial authority or real power within Venezuela, though Western nations still recognize it as the last legitimately elected parliament. This recognition gives her group legal standing over Venezuela’s assets abroad, such as the Citgo oil company and gold held in the Bank of England, which have been frozen due to ongoing litigation managed by the assembly. The selection of Figuera's delegation surprised many, as she does not represent the majority of the opposition. In Venezuela, there are at least three distinct opposition groups: the largest, centered around María Corina Machado, who won the 2023 primaries but was disqualified and ran as candidate Edmundo González in 2024; the institutional opposition represented by the 2015 National Assembly; and moderate factions that have negotiated with the chavists or participated in elections, such as Un Nuevo Tiempo and Avanzada Progresista. The United States chose the second option, excluding the other two. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, often referred to as the de facto viceroy of Latin America by the New York Times, justified the choice by stating that the 2015 assembly came to power after "the country’s last democratic election." However, the mandate of this body expired in 2021. Despite this, Figuera claimed she would invite all opposition groups to participate, with Machado playing an important role. When asked directly, Rubio acknowledged that Machado might attend the negotiations, though he phrased it conditionally. A representative of the chavist delegation denied any imposition by the United States on the agenda, stating they intend to speak with all opposition groups. Political analyst Ángel Álvarez described the process as being imposed rather than facilitated by the United States, noting that Washington decides when, where, who, and on what issues the negotiations occur. He compared the situation to South Vietnam during the war, where American military and political figures dictated decisions made by a corrupt government. He attributed this to the weakness of the opposition, which allows such decisions to be made with little resistance, and the vulnerability of the chavist government, which faces the threat of extreme measures from Washington. Since January 3, it has become clear that Washington is willing to use force against those who do not comply with its demands. The selection of the 2015 National Assembly is not coincidental. Support for Machado is high among the public, and her absence from the negotiations has sparked protests. On July 28, supporters of Machado gathered in Caracas to commemorate both the anniversary of the opposition’s claimed victory and the birth of Hugo Chávez. These demonstrations highlighted the deep divisions within the city, with different groups occupying the same space but representing opposing narratives. Meanwhile, outside the U.S. embassy in Caracas, families of political prisoners have set up a permanent protest site, demanding the release of their loved ones. One mother, Laudelina Romero, has spent over 50 days waiting for a response from the embassy, holding a photograph of her son Gabriel Barros, one of the 379 political detainees listed by the Foro Penal. Her plea is simple yet urgent: the release of all political prisoners should be the first item on any negotiation agenda. The negotiation process began under strict secrecy, with the U.S. Department of State referring to it as an "initiative" aimed at establishing a new National Electoral Council (CNE) capable of outlining a path to reopen voting booths by the end of 2027. The process is entirely under Washington’s control, with operations based in Madrid. The opposition delegation, which had been meeting in Madrid for the past week to prepare technical committees on five key areas, is scheduled to move to Caracas for initial meetings with the chavist delegation led by Jorge Rodríguez, the older brother of President Delcy Rodríguez and head of the fraudulent 2025 National Assembly. The discussions will cover the composition of the CNE, updates to the voter registry, audit of the electoral system, and a calendar for future elections. Additionally, the creation of a new Electoral Chamber within the Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ) is crucial for the upcoming elections. Both the TSJ and other judicial bodies, especially the Constitutional Chamber, were previously controlled by Cilia Flores, Maduro’s wife, who had appointed judges loyal to the regime. Legalizing and returning voter cards to banned opposition parties and lifting political bans, such as the one on Machado, are among the tasks to be addressed. John Barrett, the U.S. ambassador to Venezuela, plays a pivotal role in these negotiations, having previously worked on similar reforms in Guatemala. Another commission will focus on restoring freedom of expression, reopening radio stations and newspapers, and changing television channels. Addressing the issue of approximately 400 remaining political prisoners is another critical task, highlighting a major flaw in the current process. The U.S. aims to prevent the recurrence of past failures, where the chavist government has consistently violated agreements reached through international mediation. The date of August 1 was chosen by Washington to counter the chavist attempt to delay progress using the aftermath of the June earthquakes, a historical tactic used by the regime. Despite significant U.S. support, including over 2,000 personnel on the ground, the disaster exposed the limitations of the chavist administration, even under intense external backing.

3 reports

ABC (España) logoABC (España)IndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7513 days ago
US negotiates in Madrid with Venezuelan opposition to achieve free elections

Since two weeks ago, Madrid has hosted a series of meetings that could shape Venezuela's political future. These meetings are part of preparations for negotiations regarding the country's transition, which will officially begin on August 1st. The discussions involve representatives from the United States and Dinorah Figuera, president of Venezuela's National Assembly elected in 2015. She will face off against Jorge Rodríguez, the current chavista president of the Parliament. The talks aim to reach free elections in Venezuela.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation neutrally, focusing on the fact that negotiations are taking place between opposition figures and U.S. representatives in Spain. There is no overtly biased language, and both sides of the political spectrum are mentioned without favoritism.

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports that Dinorah Figuera was involved in negotiations in Madrid and will meet with Jorge Rodríguez in Caracas. It aligns closely with the primary source document regarding her role as president of the 2015 National Assembly and her participation in US-mediated discussions.

Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, focusing on the procedural aspects of the negotiations. While it highlights the significance of the talks, it avoids overtly emotional language or clear bias, though it still implicitly supports the US-led initiative.

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒CenterFactual 60Objective 5510 days ago
María Corina Machado will not be an "obstacle" to the negotiations forced by Washington between Chavismo 3.0 and a part of the opposition

The Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado has endorsed negotiations aimed at establishing a democratic transition and free elections, supported by former President Edmundo González Urrutia. The talks, initiated by the United States after the capture of Nicolás Maduro, aim to create new institutions such as the National Election Council (CNE) and Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ) outside the control of 'Chavismo 3.0'. The two leaders emphasized they would not hinder initiatives producing tangible results, including restoring democratic institutions, releasing political prisoners, and ensuring electoral sovereignty. The initiative, led by the US Department of State, excludes Machado despite her leadership role in the opposition's Panamá Manifesto. Both leaders expressed commitment to returning to Venezuela to support the people and build a national agreement for reconstruction.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the opposition's endorsement of the US-backed negotiation process, highlighting both their support and concerns about the initiative's exclusivity. It reports on the positions of both Machado and González Urrutia without overtly favoring either side, though

Why factuality (60): The article accurately reports that María Corina Machado and Edmundo González Urrutia have endorsed the US-led negotiations. However, it fails to mention Dinorah Figuera's involvement or her meetings with US officials, which are central to the primary source document. This omission reduces the compl

Why objectivity (55): The article leans toward supporting the US initiative while portraying the chavista government as losing sovereignty. It emphasizes the need for 'democratic transition' without providing equal space for alternative viewpoints or potential challenges to the process.

El Periódico logoEl PeriódicoIndependentCenterFactual 55Objective 5010 days ago
Machado and González admit exclusion from negotiations between Venezuelan government and opposition sector

The article reports that leaders of the opposition sector, Leopoldo López Machado and María Corina Machado, admitted to being excluded from negotiations between the Venezuelan government and their group. The report highlights the ongoing tensions between the government and opposition factions, emphasizing the lack of direct dialogue and the exclusion of certain figures from diplomatic efforts.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the exclusion of specific opposition leaders from negotiations without overtly criticizing or praising either side. It focuses on the admission by the opposition figures rather than taking a clear ideological stance, thus maintaining a balanced tone.

Why factuality (55): The article accurately reports that María Corina Machado and Edmundo González Urrutia were excluded from the negotiations. However, it does not mention Dinorah Figuera's role or her meetings with US officials, which are detailed in the primary source document. This omission limits the factual depth

Why objectivity (50): The article presents a clear bias against the inclusion of Machado and González in the negotiations, implying that their exclusion is problematic. It lacks balance by not addressing the rationale behind their exclusion or the positions of other stakeholders.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories