ON
← Back to feed
‘Education reform necessary’: PM Modi says won’t spare any paper mafia
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive8/2/2026

‘Education reform necessary’: PM Modi says won’t spare any paper mafia

Prime Minister Narendra Modi emphasized the need for education reform during a recent address, stating that he will take decisive action against corrupt practices within the education sector, including those involving illegal 'paper mafia' activities. The term 'paper mafia' refers to unscrupulous individuals and groups who engage in fraudulent academic practices such as fake degree mills, document forgery, and other forms of educational fraud. Modi's remarks highlight his commitment to addressing systemic corruption in the education system, which has been a growing concern among policymakers and educators. While the article does not provide specific details on proposed reforms or enforcement mechanisms, it underscores the government’s intent to hold all stakeholders accountable for maintaining integrity in educational institutions.

Gen Z has taken the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) by surprise, challenging its traditional methods of political engagement and forcing it to rethink its strategy in connecting with younger voters. The recent wave of protests led by the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP), a youth-led movement that began as a satirical social media campaign and evolved into a nationwide movement, has exposed the limitations of the BJP’s conventional political playbook. The protests, centered around demands for transparency in exams and accountability for alleged paper leaks, culminated in the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, marking a rare instance of a government yielding to sustained youth activism. Now, the BJP is scrambling to adapt, launching a series of social media campaigns tailored to Gen Z’s preferences, even as it faces criticism for its tone-deaf approach. The CJP movement, initiated by a Boston University graduate named Abhijeet Dipke, initially gained traction through memes and satirical posts on social media. After Chief Justice of India Surya Kant referred to some youths as “cockroaches,” the hashtag #CockroachJantaParty exploded, evolving into a powerful symbol of resistance. The protests, centered around Delhi’s Jantar Mantar, saw thousands of students and young activists taking to the streets, demanding justice and transparency. The movement quickly gained national attention, with participants using creative forms of expression, including dance and digital storytelling, to convey their message. The protests forced the government to respond, leading to the resignation of Pradhan, a move that underscored the power of youth-led movements in shaping political outcomes. In an effort to bridge the generational gap, the BJP has begun experimenting with social media strategies that mirror the language and aesthetics of Gen Z. Recent posts on the party’s X account feature pop culture references, casual dialogue, and a blend of Hindi and English internet lingo. One video opens with the iconic Friends title card, positioning Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a figure who supports the aspirations of young Indians. Another, shot in a gym setting, features a trainer and young individuals discussing the importance of looking forward rather than dwelling on the past. The dialogue includes phrases like “vibes,” “blue tick, no reply,” and “political podcast, pack up, back to workout,” reflecting a deliberate attempt to align with the vernacular of Gen Z. These efforts aim to position the BJP as a more relatable and modern political force, capable of engaging with the concerns of the younger generation. However, the BJP’s attempts to connect with Gen Z have not gone unnoticed. In Chhattisgarh, the party faced backlash for a controversial post that compared students who excel academically with those who “dance on Babur’s heritage.” The post, which juxtaposed a video of a Gen Z protester dancing during a NEET paper leak protest with a clip of a student receiving an award from President Droupadi Murmu, was widely criticized for its divisive tone. A student named Urwashi Palandurkar, who had originally posted the dance video during the protests, responded with a sharp and humorous rebuttal. Her video, which went viral, challenged the BJP’s narrative, arguing that academic success and artistic expression can coexist. She pointed out the absurdity of the party’s framing and emphasized that Gen Z is capable of achieving both intellectual and creative milestones. Her response received endorsements from prominent figures, including Arvind Kejriwal and Rahul Gandhi, highlighting the broader resonance of her critique. Meanwhile, the opposition, particularly within the Congress party, has seized the opportunity to highlight the power of youth activism. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor praised Gen Z for transforming their frustrations into meaningful political action, emphasizing that the resignation of Pradhan was a testament to the strength of democratic institutions. He encouraged young people to continue questioning authority, pushing boundaries, and holding leaders accountable. His son, Ishaan Tharoor, engaged in a playful yet insightful exchange with his father, joking about the need to “ban boomers on WhatsApp” before addressing more pressing issues. The banter, though lighthearted, underscored the generational shift in political discourse, with younger members of the party adopting a more informal and digitally savvy approach to communication. The BJP’s struggle to resonate with Gen Z is not just a tactical challenge, it reflects a deeper cultural and ideological divide. While the party has mastered the use of WhatsApp and other text-based platforms, it has struggled to adapt to the visual and interactive nature of Instagram, which has become the preferred medium for young Indians. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent attempt to address the youth through an Instagram video was met with mixed reactions. Though the video amassed over 300 million views, it was largely mocked for its lack of engagement, awkward framing, and overly formal tone. The video’s popularity was driven less by its content and more by its role as a meme, illustrating the gap between traditional political messaging and the expectations of a digitally native audience. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the interaction between Gen Z and political parties will likely shape the trajectory of future elections. The CJP movement has demonstrated that youth can wield significant influence when given a platform, and the BJP’s efforts to engage with this demographic will determine whether it can reclaim its relevance in a rapidly changing political environment. Meanwhile, the opposition’s embrace of Gen Z’s energy and digital fluency suggests that the younger generation may play an even more central role in shaping the nation’s political future.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

The Indian Express logoThe Indian ExpressIndependentCenterFactual 30Objective 507/30/2026
‘Education reform necessary’: PM Modi says won’t spare any paper mafia

Prime Minister Narendra Modi emphasized the need for education reform during a recent address, stating that he will take decisive action against corrupt practices within the education sector, including those involving illegal 'paper mafia' activities. The term 'paper mafia' refers to unscrupulous individuals and groups who engage in fraudulent academic practices such as fake degree mills, document forgery, and other forms of educational fraud. Modi's remarks highlight his commitment to addressing systemic corruption in the education system, which has been a growing concern among policymakers and educators. While the article does not provide specific details on proposed reforms or enforcement mechanisms, it underscores the government’s intent to hold all stakeholders accountable for maintaining integrity in educational institutions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Prime Minister Modi's stance on education reform without overtly endorsing or criticizing his position. It reports his statement as a directive rather than taking a partisan stance. There is no clear ideological leaning in the framing of the content, and the focus remains on the

Why factuality (30): This article discusses Rahul Gandhi's comments on the suppression of student voices but does not mention the Jharkhand student protests or the ministerial committee. It is unrelated to the primary source document.

Why objectivity (50): The article takes a clear stance in favor of Rahul Gandhi and criticizes the Modi government, showing a lack of neutrality. The tone is biased and supports one side of the issue.

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndependentProgressiveFactual 10Objective 108/2/2026
Protests were about accountability. For that, India’s Gen Z will have to keep asking hard questions

A student-led protest movement in India, led by the Cockroach Janata Party, successfully pressured the government into resigning Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan after the leak of NEET exam papers caused student suicides. The protests, which began as a joke, achieved significant concessions including Pradhan's resignation, compensation for affected families, and a promise to drop police cases against protesters. However, critics argue that the replacement minister, Pralhad Joshi, a loyalist of the ruling BJP's ideological parent organization RSS, may not be more accountable. Joshi, known for defending the release of perpetrators of the 2002 Gujarat riots, now oversees the education ministry. While the protests marked a rare government concession, concerns remain about whether true accountability has been achieved.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protests as a successful challenge to an authoritarian government, highlighting the youth's role in demanding accountability. It critiques the appointment of Pralhad Joshi, a BJP-aligned figure, suggesting a lack of meaningful change. The emphasis on student agency and the use

Why factuality (10): This article is unrelated to the Jharkhand student protests and focuses on the CJP's demands for PM Modi's apology over police action. It contains no factual information relevant to the primary source document.

Why objectivity (10): The article is neutral and reports on the CJP's stance without expressing personal bias or opinion.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories