ON
← Back to feed
Bollywood obsessed with Pakistan: Kangana defends calling Naseeruddin Shah 'lomdi'
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter11 days ago

Bollywood obsessed with Pakistan: Kangana defends calling Naseeruddin Shah 'lomdi'

BJP MP and actress Kangana Ranaut has defended her derogatory term 'lomdi' (meaning 'fox') used to describe veteran actor Naseeruddin Shah, while criticizing Bollywood for its perceived obsession with Pakistan. The controversy arose during an ongoing feud between Ranaut and Shah, who had previously criticized Bollywood celebrities for their silence on recent student protests in Delhi. Ranaut argued that the film industry has historically shown similar attitudes, citing past incidents involving protests and attacks on parliamentary buildings. She also highlighted the scale of protests near the Jharkhand Assembly, where job candidates clashed with police over allegations of irregularities in recruitment exams. Ranaut accused Bollywood of hypocrisy, suggesting that those concerned about protests in Delhi should also address issues in Jharkhand. She further criticized Shah for allegedly prioritizing Pakistan over India.

Kangana Ranaut, the BJP MP and actress, has defended her controversial remark referring to veteran actor Naseeruddin Shah as “lomdi” (meaning fox), while accusing Bollywood of being “obsessed” with Pakistan. The comments emerged amid a public feud with Shah, who had criticized Bollywood celebrities for their silence on student protests in Delhi. Ranaut’s remarks were part of a broader critique of the film industry’s perceived priorities and responses to social unrest. The dispute intensified following Shah’s statement questioning the lack of action from Bollywood figures on the student demonstrations. He remarked, “They’ll do it when their conscience tells them to. There’s a saying: a dog with a bone in its mouth can’t bark.” In response, Ranaut accused the film industry of hypocrisy, pointing to recent protests in Jharkhand where job aspirants protested alleged irregularities in recruitment exams. Clashes occurred near the state assembly, prompting a heavy police presence. Ranaut highlighted these incidents, claiming that despite the scale of the unrest, the industry remained focused on issues she deemed less urgent. Speaking to ANI, Ranaut stated, “This isn’t a new issue; the film industry has always held this attitude. You witnessed the attack on Parliament. I have many parliamentarian friends whose cars were climbed upon and whose windows were smashed. Everyone knows this; it is no secret.” She recounted protests outside her home, noting that nearly three thousand people gathered, requiring extensive police deployment. “Yet, when that situation prevailed, they were shedding crocodile tears,” she said, suggesting that the industry’s emotional responses were selective. Ranaut further criticized Bollywood’s persistent focus on Pakistan, calling it a “love affair” that has persisted since the partition of India. “Whether it is their films, their statements, or their interviews, when will this love affair with Pakistan end?” she asked. “They seem perpetually obsessed with Pakistan,” she added, emphasizing that the industry was answerable for its stance. She questioned why the relationship with Pakistan had not ended despite decades passing since independence. Her comments were amplified when she supported actor Piyush Mishra’s criticism of Shah. Ranaut reposted a report on Mishra’s remarks, which included a note in Hindi asserting that everyone is someone’s dog in one way or another. She argued that while others might benefit from the nation, she chose to defend it. “I’d rather be a dog than a lomdi like Nasiruddin,” she wrote, using the term to imply that Shah lacked loyalty. The Jharkhand protests became a focal point of Ranaut’s argument. Officials confirmed that law enforcement used water cannons, tear gas, and lathi charges during the clashes, resulting in injuries among both protesters and police. Ranaut had previously raised concerns in Parliament about the treatment of students during these protests, drawing attention to the broader implications of such actions. Ranaut’s remarks also reflect a shift in her stance toward Gen Z-led movements. Earlier, she had dismissed the generation as “gutter,” but more recently, she acknowledged their potential as a national strength. This evolution underscores the complexity of public discourse around youth activism and societal change. As tensions continue to unfold, the debate over media influence, political engagement, and social responsibility remains open.

2 reports

India Today logoIndia TodayIndependentConservativeFactual 80Objective 6511 days ago
Bollywood obsessed with Pakistan: Kangana defends calling Naseeruddin Shah 'lomdi'

BJP MP and actress Kangana Ranaut has defended her derogatory term 'lomdi' (meaning 'fox') used to describe veteran actor Naseeruddin Shah, while criticizing Bollywood for its perceived obsession with Pakistan. The controversy arose during an ongoing feud between Ranaut and Shah, who had previously criticized Bollywood celebrities for their silence on recent student protests in Delhi. Ranaut argued that the film industry has historically shown similar attitudes, citing past incidents involving protests and attacks on parliamentary buildings. She also highlighted the scale of protests near the Jharkhand Assembly, where job candidates clashed with police over allegations of irregularities in recruitment exams. Ranaut accused Bollywood of hypocrisy, suggesting that those concerned about protests in Delhi should also address issues in Jharkhand. She further criticized Shah for allegedly prioritizing Pakistan over India.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Kangana Ranaut's criticisms of Bollywood as defending national interests and questioning the industry's alignment with Pakistan, which aligns with right-leaning narratives emphasizing patriotism and skepticism toward perceived pro-Pakistan sympathies. The framing emphasizes Ranaut

Why factuality (80): The article accurately summarizes Kangana Ranaut's defense of her 'lomdi' remark and connects it to broader criticisms of Bollywood's focus on Pakistan. It includes direct quotes from Ranaut and contextualizes her comments within ongoing tensions between her and Naseeruddin Shah. Cross-source consis

Why objectivity (65): While the article remains largely neutral in reporting facts, it frames Ranaut's comments as part of a larger critique of Bollywood, which subtly positions her as a critic of industry norms. Emotional language is used to emphasize the gravity of the situations she describes, introducing a mild subje

NDTV logoNDTVParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 75Objective 6011 days ago
'Eats Here But...': Kangana Ranaut Jabs Naseeruddin Shah Over 'Dog' Remark

Kangana Ranaut posted on Instagram a report referencing a comment made by Mishra, who participated in protests with students at the Jaipal Singh Munda Stadium in Ranchi. The post appears to reference a controversial remark involving a 'dog,' though the specific context and full details of the comment are not elaborated in the provided text.

Bias read (Progressive): The article references a public figure (Kangana Ranaut) making a jab at another individual (Naseeruddin Shah), which suggests a potential political or social commentary. While the exact nature of the 'dog' remark is unclear, the act of public criticism by a prominent personality often carries a tone

Why factuality (75): The article reports on Kangana Ranaut's social media post referencing Mishra's comment during student protests in Jharkhand. It provides context about the event but lacks specific details from primary sources. The information aligns with cross-source consensus regarding the nature of the protest and

Why objectivity (60): The article presents Ranaut's perspective with some emotional language, particularly in describing the scale of the protest and the police response. While it does not overtly take sides, the tone leans toward defending Ranaut's actions and highlighting perceived hypocrisy in Bollywood, which introdu

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories