ON
← Back to feed
E-mails banned: FragDenStaat.at is sending Freedom of Information requests by fax again
Austria🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 hr. ago

E-mails banned: FragDenStaat.at is sending Freedom of Information requests by fax again

The Austrian Information Freedom Act (IFG), which came into effect in September 2025, aims to increase transparency in government operations. However, some agencies, including the Finance Ministry and Justice Department, refuse to accept information requests via email, opting instead for fax or web forms. This has led the transparency platform FragDenStaat.at to revert to using faxes to submit requests. The decision by these agencies is based on claims that electronic submissions could lead to spam or misdirected emails. Critics, including Markus Hametner of the Transparency NGO 'Forum Informationsfreiheit,' describe this move as regressive, likening it to the 1980s, and argue it undermines public access to information.

Go to the primary sources (6)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Der Standard logoDer StandardIndependentCenter4 hr. ago
E-mails banned: FragDenStaat.at is sending Freedom of Information requests by fax again

The Austrian Information Freedom Act (IFG), which came into effect in September 2025, aims to increase transparency in government operations. However, some agencies, including the Finance Ministry and Justice Department, refuse to accept information requests via email, opting instead for fax or web forms. This has led the transparency platform FragDenStaat.at to revert to using faxes to submit requests. The decision by these agencies is based on claims that electronic submissions could lead to spam or misdirected emails. Critics, including Markus Hametner of the Transparency NGO 'Forum Informationsfreiheit,' describe this move as regressive, likening it to the 1980s, and argue it undermines public access to information.

Bias read (Center): While the issue of information access is politically charged, the article presents both the arguments of the government agencies (concerns over spam and misdelivery) and the criticisms from transparency advocates. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing of the story, and the reporting is,

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories