Lacson confirms OVP catering request; Poa says Senate isn’t payingSenator Panfilo Lacson confirmed that the Office of the Vice President (OVP) requested Senate funding for catering during Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment trial. However, the defense team's spokesperson, Michael Poa, stated that the request does not seem to have been approved. Poa declined to comment further on the July 7 letter, which reportedly asked the Senate to cover the costs of food and beverages for the defense team, support staff, and witnesses. Lacson noted that while the initial letter was authentic, a follow-up communication appeared to modify its content. He expressed concerns that the request might violate government procurement laws, as the Senate already has its own caterer selected through a competitive bidding process. The OVP argued that using its accredited caterer was necessary for security reasons.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue: Senator Lacson confirming the OVP's request and Michael Poa stating the request was not granted. It includes quotes from both parties and provides context regarding the potential legal implications of the request. There is no evident bias toward either政治
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on the potential for separate legal action against VP Sara Duterte following the NBI's investigation, as suggested by Rep. Robert Ace Barbers. This aligns with the primary source documents, which include similar statements from Barbers.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the information without bias. It avoids taking sides and focuses on reporting the statements made by both the defense and the prosecution.
Charging culprits in flood control mess will continue – EjercitoSenator JV Ejercito stated that the Senate will continue pursuing accountability for individuals involved in the flood control project scandals, despite the ongoing impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte. The Ombudsman is preparing to charge eight 'cong-tractors', individuals allegedly involved in securing government contracts through conflicts of interest. Ejercito emphasized that the investigation into the flood control issues will not be delayed or overshadowed by the impeachment trial. He also noted that the Senate will maintain its legislative duties, including budget discussions, alongside the impeachment process. Ejercito reiterated the importance of transparency and ensuring public funds allocated for flood control are properly utilized.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from Senator JV Ejercito regarding the Senate's commitment to holding individuals accountable for the flood control project anomalies. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The content remains focused on the Senate's
Why factuality (95): The article accurately explains the distinction between the NBI's criminal investigation and the Senate's impeachment trial. It quotes the House spokesperson and clarifies the legal boundaries, aligning with the primary source and avoiding misinformation.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, explaining legal distinctions without taking sides. It presents the position of the prosecution without emotive language.
Duterte impeachment trial: Group urges full disclosure of VP’s financesA coalition of progressive groups, including Samahan ng Progresibong Kabataan (Spark) and the August Twenty-One Movement (Atom), gathered outside the Senate in Manila on July 20, 2026, demanding that Vice President Sara Duterte's bank and tax records be subpoenaed as part of her ongoing impeachment trial. These groups argue that full financial disclosure is essential to ensure transparency and accountability, particularly amid allegations of corruption and misuse of public funds during Duterte's tenure. They criticized the Duterte defense team for resisting the release of these documents and warned that senators opposing the subpoenas would be enabling potential corruption. The groups emphasized the importance of thoroughly examining the Vice President's financial history and urged the Senate to take decisive action in the trial.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the demands of progressive groups calling for the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte, emphasizing the need for full financial disclosure and holding public officials accountable. The tone and framing strongly support the prosecution's case and criticize those opposing it
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on the ongoing impeachment trial of VP Sara Duterte, focusing on the upcoming Senate vote regarding subpoenas for her financial records. It includes relevant context about the groups advocating for full disclosure and properly cites the event date and location.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a largely neutral tone while reporting on the political developments surrounding the impeachment trial. It presents the positions of different stakeholders without overtly favoring any particular side, though it does emphasize the importance of accountability and transparency.
PH![[EDITORIAL] Impartial justice — ‘yan ang sinagasaan ng ‘trolling’ ni Pia Cayetano](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=newsinfo.inquirer.net%2Ffiles%2F2026%2F06%2FErwin-Tulfo-16June2026.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
