ON
← Back to feed
elDiario.es logo🏛️ Politics
Spain🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 days ago

Dolores del Castillo, CSIC scientist and food expert: "Everything natural does not have to be healthy"

Dolores del Castillo, bioquímica del CSIC especializada en alimentación, desmiente varios mitos relacionados con la salud y la seguridad alimentaria. Explica que el café no es perjudicial para la salud, beber una copa de vino al día no es recomendable, y los alimentos naturales no necesariamente son más saludables que los procesados. Además, advierte sobre la importancia de la higiene alimentaria, destacando que procesos como el lavado con lejía o el escaldado son esenciales para garantizar la inocuidad. También menciona el aumento de intoxicaciones alimentarias globales y el riesgo asociado al consumo de alimentos crudos, como el tartar o el carpaccio, debido a la posible presencia de microorganismos dañinos.

Dolores del Castillo, a biochemist and food scientist with the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), has challenged common assumptions about natural foods during a seminar at the University of International Menéndez Pelayo. She stated, “Everything natural does not necessarily have to be healthy.” Her remarks highlight the complexity of modern dietary choices and the need for informed decision-making beyond simplistic notions of ‘natural’ versus ‘processed.’ Del Castillo, who leads the CSIC’s Food Bioscience Group, emphasized that many health misconceptions persist in public discourse. For instance, she noted that while coffee is often viewed negatively, it can be part of a balanced diet. Similarly, moderate wine consumption, such as one glass per day, is not inherently harmful. She further clarified that natural foods are not automatically more nutritious than processed ones, challenging the widespread belief that processing always diminishes nutritional value. The seminar addressed broader concerns about food security and nutrition, particularly in times of economic hardship. Del Castillo pointed out that rising food prices often lead to reduced access to diverse, high-quality diets. This trend contributes to both undernutrition and overnutrition, as families may sacrifice variety and quality for affordability. She warned that this dual challenge affects millions globally, with inadequate nutrients and excessive caloric intake both posing serious health risks. A key focus of the discussion was the growing threat of foodborne illnesses. According to data presented, food-related diseases cause over a million deaths annually worldwide. These include both mild cases such as nausea and severe conditions leading to chronic illness or death. Del Castillo stressed the importance of maintaining hygiene throughout the food chain, from washing vegetables with bleach-like solutions at home to controlled industrial processes that ensure safety without compromising taste or nutrition. She also highlighted the dangers associated with raw food trends, such as eating tartar or carpaccio. While these dishes may appeal to gourmet tastes, they carry inherent risks due to potential microbial contamination. Although some bacteria are beneficial to human gut flora, others can cause harm if they dominate harmful strains. Del Castillo explained that the body hosts nearly two kilograms of microorganisms, which play a vital role in digestion and immunity, but their balance must be maintained. The conversation reflected broader societal shifts toward rejecting industrial food production. However, Del Castillo cautioned against outright opposition to technology, noting that regulated processing ensures safety without sacrificing nutritional integrity. She argued that food itself is neither inherently good nor bad; rather, the issue lies in how individuals consume it within the context of overall diet and lifestyle. A single indulgent meal, for example, might not pose a problem if it fits within recommended daily limits. But habitual reliance on highly processed or unhealthy options can gradually undermine long-term wellness. In her view, sustainable and healthy eating requires diversity and moderation. Natural foods should not be assumed to be superior, and even raw ingredients demand proper preparation to avoid health risks. As food systems evolve, balancing tradition with scientific understanding will remain essential for promoting both individual well-being and global food security.

1 reports

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 857 days ago
Dolores del Castillo, CSIC scientist and food expert: "Everything natural does not have to be healthy"

Dolores del Castillo, bioquímica del CSIC especializada en alimentación, desmiente varios mitos relacionados con la salud y la seguridad alimentaria. Explica que el café no es perjudicial para la salud, beber una copa de vino al día no es recomendable, y los alimentos naturales no necesariamente son más saludables que los procesados. Además, advierte sobre la importancia de la higiene alimentaria, destacando que procesos como el lavado con lejía o el escaldado son esenciales para garantizar la inocuidad. También menciona el aumento de intoxicaciones alimentarias globales y el riesgo asociado al consumo de alimentos crudos, como el tartar o el carpaccio, debido a la posible presencia de microorganismos dañinos.

Bias read (Center): El artículo presenta información basada en la ciencia y la experiencia profesional de Dolores del Castillo sin mostrar un sesgo claro hacia ninguna ideología política. Se enfoca en aspectos técnicos y científicos de la alimentación, evitando posiciones ideológicas explícitas. Aunque aborda temas de栠

Why factuality (95): The article presents factual information from Dolores del Castillo, a scientist at CSIC, discussing topics such as the health effects of coffee, wine consumption, and the distinction between natural and processed foods. The claims align with general scientific understanding and are supported by her

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting the views of an expert without overt bias. However, it uses phrases like 'rebate muchos mitos' which may imply a slight editorial stance toward common misconceptions. Overall, it remains mostly objective.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories