Democrats in two deeply red Senate races, Montana and South Dakota, are refusing to abandon their campaigns despite mounting pressure from within their party to step aside for more viable independent candidates. Both candidates, Alani Bankhead and Julian Beaudion, have categorically rejected calls to withdraw, citing personal conviction and strategic optimism. Their refusal comes amid growing concerns that their presence on the ballot could further entrench Republican dominance in the Mountain West, particularly in states where former President Donald Trump secured overwhelming support in 2024. Polling data indicates that independent candidates Seth Bodnar in South Dakota and Brian Bengs in Montana are gaining ground. These candidates, backed by substantial fundraising and robust campaign infrastructure, appear to have clearer paths to victory than either Bankhead or Beaudion. However, neither independent candidate is guaranteed success, and the political landscape remains uncertain. For example, Bengs has warned that Beaudion’s continued candidacy could undermine his chances of defeating Republican Senator Mike Rounds. Meanwhile, Bodnar believes his prospects remain viable, potentially benefiting from a Libertarian candidate siphoning votes from the Republican incumbent, Kurt Alme. The deadline to withdraw from the race in South Dakota is approaching, set for Tuesday, while Montana’s cutoff is scheduled for August 10. In both states, Democrats at the local and national levels are urging Bankhead and Beaudion to step aside, arguing that allowing an independent to win could provide the party with a strategic advantage. This strategy hinges on the possibility that an independent candidate might align with a future Democratic Senate majority rather than voting with Republicans. A representative from the centrist Democratic think tank Third Way emphasized that the primary goal is to defeat the MAGA-aligned Republicans, and the identity of the victor is secondary to that objective. This push for candidates to withdraw mirrors efforts in other states where Democrats have successfully facilitated independent-versus-Republican matchups. In Nebraska, a Democratic candidate withdrew to make way for independent Dan Osborn, although an ongoing legal challenge complicates the outcome. Similarly, in Idaho, the Democratic nominee stepped aside in favor of independent Todd Achilles, who acknowledged the difficulty of recognizing when a campaign is unlikely to succeed. “Knowing that your campaign is not gonna break through, and just being able to recognize that is probably the hardest thing of all,” Achilles said, expressing appreciation for the decision made by his predecessor. Bankhead and Beaudion, however, remain steadfast in their commitment to running. Bankhead argues that the anti-incumbent sentiment and appeal of an outsider candidate could carry her to victory. Beaudion, meanwhile, points to his established connections with voters as a key asset. Both candidates acknowledge the unpredictability of elections but maintain confidence in their ability to secure the necessary support. “Nobody ever knows what’s actually going to happen in an election,” Bankhead said, emphasizing that the final decision rests with voters on November 3. Political analysts and strategists within the Democratic Party are divided on the long-term implications of this situation. While some argue that the party’s brand has become too tainted in certain states to offer a viable path to victory, others believe that the current approach reflects a broader shift toward pragmatic strategies. Pat Dennis, president of American Bridge 21st Century, noted that while he personally identifies as a Democrat, the ultimate priority is to prevent Republicans from maintaining Senate control. “In some states, that path is very difficult,” Dennis admitted, highlighting the complexity of the issue. As the race enters its final stretch, the decisions made by Bankhead and Beaudion will likely shape the trajectory of Democratic ambitions in the Mountain West.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
United States
