‘Females treated with dignity’: Delhi Police reject assault claims, issue journalist guidelines as accused cop gets promoted
Delhi Police has denied allegations of sexual harassment and physical assault against female protesters during a demonstration at Jantar Mantar on October 3, calling such claims 'baseless and misleading.' Three women journalists accused police personnel of misconduct during the protest against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Despite these allegations, ACP Vivek Bhagat, who was accused of sexual harassment by one of the journalists, was promoted to Additional DCP. In response, the police issued new guidelines for journalists covering protests, requiring them to display valid identification and avoid obstructing police operations.
Delhi Police issued new guidelines for journalists covering protests on Monday, requiring them to carry valid identity cards and maintain a safe distance from demonstrators. The advisory, shared via social media, emphasized that journalists should not hinder police operations or the movement of law enforcement personnel. The instructions included keeping identification cards visible at all times and positioning themselves distinctly from protesters during tense situations. The guidelines followed allegations by three women journalists who claimed they were sexually harassed by police officers during a protest against the Chief Election Commissioner at Jantar Mantar on October 3. Delhi Police confirmed receiving these complaints and stated they had been forwarded to the Crime Branch for investigation. According to the police, the allegations of sexual harassment were "baseless and misleading." They clarified that female protesters were handled by female staff and "treated with dignity and due regard." The police also noted that male protesters detained during the protest were released within the stipulated time frame, adhering to legal procedures. Despite the police's denial, one of the accused officers, ACP Vivek Bhagat, was promoted to Additional DCP on Monday. This promotion occurred despite allegations against him by one of the journalists, who claimed he sexually assaulted her after she questioned his actions regarding the absence of female police officers at the protest site. Senior police officials stated the promotion was part of a routine order and had been proposed earlier. The incident prompted backlash, with the Cockroach Janta Party criticizing the promotion, accusing the police of rewarding misconduct. Meanwhile, several independent journalists and social media influencers staged a protest outside Parliament Street police station, demanding the registration of First Information Reports (FIRs) against the accused officers. Delhi Police reiterated the importance of ethical journalism, stating, "The story matters, so does how you get it!" in their advisory. They urged journalists to carry valid identity cards issued by their organizations or accreditation cards from the Press Information Bureau (PIB) or Delhi Information and Publicity (DIP). The police also mentioned that the complaints from the journalists would undergo a "fair and impartial enquiry" by the Crime Branch. However, no FIRs have been registered yet, leaving the allegations unaddressed officially. Journalists were advised to maintain a reasonable distance from protesters during volatile situations to ensure their safety and avoid any obstruction to police work. The advisory aimed to clarify the responsibilities of journalists while covering sensitive events and to reinforce the need for cooperation between media personnel and law enforcement. The incident highlights ongoing tensions between media professionals and law enforcement, particularly concerning the treatment of journalists during public demonstrations. As the investigation continues, the outcome will determine whether the allegations against the police officers hold merit.
Delhi Police issued an advisory requiring journalists covering protests to carry valid identification cards and avoid obstructing police operations. The guidelines emphasize maintaining a safe distance from protesters and ensuring clear distinction between journalists and demonstrators. This follows recent allegations of sexual harassment by three female journalists against Delhi Police officers during a protest against the Election Commission. The complaints were referred to the Crime Branch for investigation, prompting additional protests by independent journalists demanding formal complaints (FIRs) against the accused officers.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the advisory from Delhi Police and includes context about the allegations of sexual harassment and subsequent protests by journalists. It reports both the police guidelines and the journalists' responses without overtly favoring either side. The language remains neutral, and the
Delhi Police has denied allegations of sexual harassment and physical assault against female protesters during a demonstration at Jantar Mantar on October 3, calling such claims 'baseless and misleading.' Three women journalists accused police personnel of misconduct during the protest against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Despite these allegations, ACP Vivek Bhagat, who was accused of sexual harassment by one of the journalists, was promoted to Additional DCP. In response, the police issued new guidelines for journalists covering protests, requiring them to display valid identification and avoid obstructing police operations.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the police's denial of the allegations as definitive and dismissive, using strong language like 'baseless and misleading' to characterize the claims. It emphasizes the promotion of the accused officer without critical examination, and presents the police guidelines as necessary,而非
Three women journalists reported being sexually harassed by police personnel during a demonstration on October 3. The complaints have been forwarded to the Crime Branch for further investigation. This incident highlights ongoing concerns about misconduct within law enforcement and the challenges faced by female journalists in professional settings.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation factually without overtly criticizing or praising any political entity. It focuses on the procedural transfer of complaints rather than taking a stance on the broader implications of police conduct or journalistic safety.
Delhi Police has issued specific guidelines for journalists covering protests in the city. These rules outline procedures that reporters must follow while documenting demonstrations, likely aiming to ensure safety, maintain order, and regulate the flow of information during public gatherings. The regulations may include restrictions on where journalists can operate, requirements for identification, and protocols for interacting with law enforcement. Such measures are often implemented to manage crowd control and prevent disruptions during sensitive events.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a policy change by Delhi Police regarding journalistic practices at protests, which is inherently a political issue. However, the content does not exhibit clear bias toward any particular side; it simply states the implementation of new rules without commentary or favoritism.
Three journalists allege they were sexually harassed by a police officer during a protest at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi. The incident reportedly occurred while they were covering the demonstration, which is a common site for protests in India. Despite the allegations, no formal First Information Report (FIR) has been filed by authorities. The journalists have come forward with their accounts, highlighting concerns about safety and accountability for women in public spaces. The lack of action from law enforcement has raised questions about the handling of such incidents and the protection of journalists' rights.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident as a serious violation of journalistic integrity and personal safety, emphasizing the failure of law enforcement to act. It highlights systemic issues related to gender-based harassment and the lack of accountability, which aligns with progressive advocacy for women's
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
India
