ON
← Back to feed
Dalija Orešković: Did Turudić keep quiet about the findings from Gospić so that the riot at the protest would not be bigger?
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive9/8/2026

Dalija Orešković: Did Turudić keep quiet about the findings from Gospić so that the riot at the protest would not be bigger?

Dalija Orešković, a member of parliament, raised concerns on Facebook after the environmental organization USKOK published findings confirming that delayed waste in Varaždin permanently pollutes the environment, while the wild landfill in Divosel near Gospić has contaminated local groundwater with microplastics. The report highlights high concentrations of microplastics, heavy metals, and infectious pathogenic bacteria, posing direct threats to the environment. Tests conducted by the Institute for Waters 'Josip Juraj Strossmayer' confirmed significant levels of microplastics in groundwater beneath the Divosel landfill. Parallel investigations at the former Mundus factory site in Varaždin revealed the presence of harmful bacteria such as E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus, along with dangerous concentrations of heavy metals like copper, zinc, and lead, alongside high levels of microplastics. Orešković questioned whether the prime minister and his allies are deliberately misleading the public and called for accountability regarding potential criminal responsibility among top government officials.

Croatian parliamentary representative Dalija Orešković questioned whether Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and his allies had withheld findings from a waste site near Gospić to prevent unrest ahead of a protest. She raised these concerns on Facebook after the Environmental Protection Agency (USKOK) released results confirming that long-term waste deposits in Varaždin continue to pollute the environment, while a wild dump near Gospić has contaminated groundwater with microplastics. The findings, conducted at the request of USKOK, revealed high concentrations of microplastics, hazardous heavy metals, and the presence of infectious pathogenic bacteria, posing a direct threat to the environment. Testing of water at three locations, upstream, at the waste site, and downstream, found the highest concentration of plastic particles directly beneath the dump. Among the samples, the most common was ground polyethylene, along with compounds known as persistent chemicals. Parallel tests at the former Mundus factory site in Varaždin showed the presence of pathogenic bacteria such as E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus, alongside dangerous levels of heavy metals including copper, zinc, and lead, combined with high levels of microplastics. The report stated that the deposited waste represents a lasting source of physical, chemical, and sanitary pollution for the environment as long as it remains in place. Removing the waste and properly rehabilitating the affected soil could significantly reduce the risk of widespread environmental damage and harm to human health. Following the release of the findings, SDP parliamentary representative Mihael Zmajlović criticized the government, stating that it does not control anything and that USKOK has demonstrated its ability to measure accurately. He noted that five days had passed since Plenković claimed everything was under control during a visit to Gospić, during which five ministers drank water in front of cameras. Zmajlović emphasized that the findings were already available in August from an institute founded by the state, adding that the government learned about the microplastic contamination through media reports rather than official channels. He outlined two possibilities: either the government knew and staged the drinking of water as a performance for citizens, or it genuinely did not know and thus lacks control over the situation. Either scenario, he argued, would require legal action in a well-governed country. He called for investigations into the chain of permits, boundaries, oversight, and silence extending up to ministerial cabinets, warning that if the inquiry stops at the owner of the company and a local council advisor, the investigation would fail to address larger issues. Zmajlović demanded that the government immediately take action under the Environmental Protection Act, setting a deadline, allocating funds, and appointing a responsible person to initiate the cleanup of Gospić. He warned that the government, which has failed to act for 570 days, will have to answer for this decision on the first day of parliament’s session on September 15.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

3 reports

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 759/7/2026
SDP's Zmajlović: I expect Uskok to report whether it is investigating all the way to the cabinets

SDP member of parliament Mihael Zmajlović criticized the government after Uskok released findings confirming that delayed waste in Varaždin permanently pollutes the environment, while a wild landfill in Divosel near Gospić has contaminated local groundwater with microplastics. Zmajlović stated that the government does not control anything related to the issue and that the findings were already known when ministers drank water during a visit to Gospić. He emphasized that either the government knew about the contamination and staged the event or they were unaware and rely on media reports. Zmajlović called for investigations into the chain of permits, boundaries, oversight, and silence up to ministerial cabinets and demanded immediate action under environmental protection laws to declare Gospić a threatened area and initiate cleanup.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the government as unresponsive and out of control regarding environmental issues, criticizes ministers' actions, and demands accountability from the executive branch. The tone is critical of the ruling party and emphasizes the need for stricter regulation and transparency, aligns

Why factuality (85): The article reports on statements made by Mihael Zmajlović from SDP regarding the findings of USKOK related to microplastic contamination in groundwater near Gospić. It references the timeline between Plenković’s statement and the release of the report, as well as Zmajlović’s interpretation of the f

Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat critical of the government’s handling of the issue, particularly through Zmajlović’s statements. There is some editorializing in the phrasing of his quotes and the implications drawn about government control versus transparency. However, the overall reporting remains focused on

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 609/7/2026
Dalija Orešković: Did Turudić keep quiet about the findings from Gospić so that the riot at the protest would not be bigger?

Dalija Orešković, a member of parliament, raised concerns on Facebook after the environmental organization USKOK published findings confirming that delayed waste in Varaždin permanently pollutes the environment, while the wild landfill in Divosel near Gospić has contaminated local groundwater with microplastics. The report highlights high concentrations of microplastics, heavy metals, and infectious pathogenic bacteria, posing direct threats to the environment. Tests conducted by the Institute for Waters 'Josip Juraj Strossmayer' confirmed significant levels of microplastics in groundwater beneath the Divosel landfill. Parallel investigations at the former Mundus factory site in Varaždin revealed the presence of harmful bacteria such as E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus, along with dangerous concentrations of heavy metals like copper, zinc, and lead, alongside high levels of microplastics. Orešković questioned whether the prime minister and his allies are deliberately misleading the public and called for accountability regarding potential criminal responsibility among top government officials.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through critical questioning of the government's actions and alleged misinformation, suggesting deliberate deception by high-ranking officials including the prime minister and ministers of environment and health. It emphasizes the need for accountability and implies malg

Why factuality (80): The article mentions the USKOK findings and Troskot’s call for an ecological emergency, but it introduces additional unverified claims, such as questioning the integrity of the government and implying potential criminal responsibility. These claims lack supporting evidence and are speculative.

Why objectivity (60): The article has a strong political tone, accusing the government of misleading the public and suggesting conspiracy theories. This highly biased framing significantly reduces objectivity.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 709/8/2026
Valeria Rossi on microplastics at Gospić: We are still in the dark

Valerija Rossi, a member of the Croatian Geological Society, appeared on Nova Doba with Hanan Nanić to discuss recent findings from groundwater testing in Gospić and environmental contamination in Varaždin. She explained why monitoring and cleaning the karst system is particularly challenging. The discussion focused on microplastic pollution and the difficulties in assessing and addressing environmental damage in karst regions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a scientific discussion on environmental issues without overt ideological framing. It focuses on expert commentary regarding technical challenges in monitoring pollution in karst systems, which is a factual and non-partisan topic. No clear bias or slant is evident in the framing

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (70): The article includes direct quotes from Rossi but also frames her comments within a discussion of public opinion and media engagement. There is a slight bias toward emphasizing the uncertainty and complexity of the situation, which may reflect a more cautious or informative tone rather than outright

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories